Inhomogeneity of human vertebral cancellous bone: systematic density and structure patterns inside the vertebral body.

In the spine, cancellous bone quality is usually assessed for the whole vertebral body in a transverse central slice. Correct identification and assessment of the weakest parts of the cancellous bone may lead to better prediction of fracture risk. The density and structural parameters were systematically investigated inside the thoracic (T-9), thoracolumbar (T12-L1), and lumbar (L-4) vertebral bodies of nine subjects. On both sides of the median sagittal plane, anterior and posterior 8.2 mm vertical cores were harvested in the thoracic vertebra. In the thoracolumbar and lumbar vertebrae, external samples were also cored. Peripheral quantitative computed tomographic (pQCT) density analysis of the 136 cores was performed at four different levels, from the lower to the upper endplate. The relatively thin slice thickness (300 microm) and small pixel size (70 microm x 70 microm) was considered sufficient to investigate the structural parameters on the four transverse slices and in the sagittal and coronal planes (total of 816 images). Using a constant threshold a binary image was generated and the morphometric data were extracted. The binary image was further skeletonized and classical strut analysis was performed. Cancellous bone density was 20% higher in the posterior cores than in the anterior and external cores. Moreover, clear vertical inhomogeneity was noted because the lowest half of the vertebral body presented lower density than the upper half (differences ranging from 25% to 15%). All structural parameters were strongly dependent on the location of the measurement. Structural differences between anterior, posterior, and external areas were mild and followed the density patterns. On the other hand, vertical inhomogeneity of the structural parameters was important. For example, in the thoracolumbar and lumbar vertebrae, the numbers of nodes or node-to-node struts were almost twofold higher in the inferior half than in the superior half (p < 0.01), whereas trabecular thickness and number of free-ends presented a center/close-to-endplate structural pattern, with central trabeculae being 15% thicker (p < 0.05) and presenting 30% fewer free-ends (p < 0.01) than the close-to-endplate ones. Variability of density and structural parameters was high and a substantial part of this variability could be explained by the place inside the vertebral body where the measurement was made. The weak part was not in the center of the body but in its upper half where the lower density did not seem to be compensated by a higher structural architecture. Further clinical investigation could enhance fracture prediction by tracking and focusing on the weakest part of the vertebral body.

[1]  G V Cochran,et al.  A new manual method for assessing two‐dimensional cancellous bone structure: Comparison between iliac crest and lumbar vertebra , 1991, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  H. Amstutz,et al.  The structure of the vertebral spongiosa. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  K. Singer,et al.  Prediction of thoracic and lumbar vertebral body compressive strength: correlations with bone mineral density and vertebral region. , 1995, Bone.

[4]  Validation of pQCT for human vertebral bone samples density measurement , 2000 .

[5]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Biologically meaningful determinants of the in vitro strength of lumbar vertebrae. , 1991, Bone.

[6]  T. McMahon,et al.  Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  H. Genant,et al.  Osteoporosis: assessment by quantitative computed tomography. , 1985, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[8]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: State of the art , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Local Differences in Mineral Content in Vertebral Trabecular Bone Measured by Dual-Energy Computed Tomography , 1989, Acta radiologica.

[10]  J. Compston,et al.  Age-related changes in iliac crest trabecular microanatomic bone structure in man. , 1987, Bone.

[11]  M. Hahn,et al.  The Thickness of Human Vertebral Cortical Bone and its Changes in Aging and Osteoporosis: A Histomorphometric Analysis of the Complete Spinal Column from Thirty‐Seven Autopsy Specimens , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  S A Goldstein,et al.  Static and fatigue failure properties of thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies and their relation to regional density. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  J. Adachi,et al.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure at the distal radius from high-resolution computed tomography images. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  A. Parfitt Implications of architecture for the pathogenesis and prevention of vertebral fracture. , 1992, Bone.

[15]  D. Cody,et al.  Correlations Between Vertebral Regional Bone Mineral Density (rBMD) and Whole Bone Fracture Load , 1991, Spine.

[16]  L. Mosekilde Age-related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture--assessed by a new method. , 1988, Bone.

[17]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Trabecular Bone Mineral and Calculated Structure of Human Bone Specimens Scanned by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography: Relation to Biomechanical Properties , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[18]  H. Genant,et al.  Image-Based Assessment of Spinal Trabecular Bone Structure from High-Resolution CT Images , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[19]  W. Hayes,et al.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  W. Kalender,et al.  Global and regional variations in the spinal trabecular bone: single and dual energy examinations. , 1991, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[21]  W C Hayes,et al.  Computed tomography‐based finite element analysis predicts failure loads and fracture patterns for vertebral sections , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  H K Genant,et al.  Advanced imaging of bone macro and micro structure. , 1999, Bone.

[23]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Structural mechanisms of trabecular bone loss in man. , 1989, Bone and mineral.

[24]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.