Complex interactions between spatial, orientation, and motion cues for biological motion perception across visual space.

Human observers are adept at perceiving complex actions in point-light biological motion displays that represent the human form with a sparse array of moving points. However, the neural computations supporting action perception remain unclear, particularly with regards to central versus peripheral vision. We created novel action stimuli comprised of Gabor patches to examine the contributions of various competing visual cues to action perception across the visual field. The Gabor action stimulus made it possible to pin down form processing at two levels: (a) local information about limb angle represented by Gabor orientations and (b) global body structure signaled by the spatial arrangement of Gabor patches. This stimulus also introduced two types of motion signals: (a) local velocity represented by Gabor drifting motion and (b) joint motion trajectories signaled by position changes of Gabor disks over time. In central vision, the computational analysis of global cues based on the spatial arrangement of joints and joint trajectories dominated processing, with minimal influence of local drifting motion and orientation cues. In the periphery we found that local drifting motion and orientation cues interacted with spatial cues in sophisticated ways depending on the particular discrimination task and location within the visual field to influence action perception. This dissociation was evident in several experiments showing phantom action percepts in the periphery that contradicted central vision. Our findings suggest a highly flexible and adaptive system for processing visual cues at multiple levels for biological motion and action perception.

[1]  R. Vogels,et al.  Functional differentiation of macaque visual temporal cortical neurons using a parametric action space. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  R. Blake,et al.  What constitutes an efficient reference frame for vision? , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Jeroen J. A. van Boxtel,et al.  Signature Movements Lead to Efficient Search for Threatening Actions , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  J. Anthony Movshon,et al.  Dissociation of Neuronal and Psychophysical Responses to Local and Global Motion , 2011, Current Biology.

[5]  D. Atchison,et al.  MRI study of the changes in crystalline lens shape with accommodation and aging in humans. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[6]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Interaction of visual hemifield and body view in biological motion perception , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  Rick Gurnsey,et al.  Limits of peripheral direction discrimination of point-light walkers. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[8]  H E M Journal of Neurophysiology , 1938, Nature.

[9]  J Zhang,et al.  Motion contrast and motion integration. , 1993, Vision research.

[10]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  Bruce C Hansen,et al.  Peripheral vision: good for biological motion, bad for signal noise segregation? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[12]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors , 1991, Vision Research.

[14]  G. Orban,et al.  Human Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Separation and Integration of Shape and Motion Cues in Biological Motion Processing , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Lappe,et al.  Perception of biological motion from limited-lifetime stimuli , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Sheng He,et al.  Emergent Filling In Induced by Motion Integration Reveals a High-Level Mechanism in Filling In , 2012, Psychological science.

[17]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Peripheral sensitivity to biological motion conveyed by first and second-order signals , 2010, Vision Research.

[18]  S. Nishida,et al.  Adaptive pooling of visual motion signals by the human visual system revealed with a novel multi-element stimulus. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[19]  Emily D Grossman,et al.  Temporal "Bubbles" reveal key features for point-light biological motion perception. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[20]  D Marr,et al.  Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[21]  Antonino Casile,et al.  Critical features for the recognition of biological motion. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[22]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  The furrow illusion: peripheral motion becomes aligned with stationary contours. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[24]  George Mather,et al.  Motion-induced position shifts occur after motion integration , 2009, Vision Research.

[25]  G. Orban,et al.  Specificity of regions processing biological motion , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Life motion signals lengthen perceived temporal duration , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  M. Sereno,et al.  Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  K. D. Valois,et al.  Motion contrast and motion integration , 1993, Vision Research.

[29]  J. Lange,et al.  A Model of Biological Motion Perception from Configural Form Cues , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[31]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Subconfigurations of the human form in the perception of biological motion displays. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[32]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[33]  Hongjing Lu,et al.  Structural processing in biological motion perception. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[34]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[35]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[36]  H. Lu,et al.  Visual search by action category. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[37]  M. Pavlova,et al.  Orientation specificity in biological motion perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[40]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[41]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Patterns of fMRI Activity Dissociate Overlapping Functional Brain Areas that Respond to Biological Motion , 2006, Neuron.

[42]  A. Rider,et al.  Motion-induced position shifts in global dynamic Gabor arrays. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[43]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Local-to-global form interference in biological motion perception , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[44]  D. Sheinberg,et al.  Temporal Cortex Neurons Encode Articulated Actions as Slow Sequences of Integrated Poses , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[46]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The perception of biological motion across apertures , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Brain activity for peripheral biological motion in the posterior superior temporal gyrus and the fusiform gyrus: Dependence on visual hemifield and view orientation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[48]  D. Perrett,et al.  Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Wendy Baccus,et al.  Form and motion make independent contributions to the response to biological motion in occipitotemporal cortex , 2012, NeuroImage.

[50]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  A First- and Second-Order Motion Energy Analysis of Peripheral Motion Illusions Leads to Further Evidence of “Feature Blur” in Peripheral Vision , 2011, PloS one.

[51]  J. Lange,et al.  Visual perception of biological motion by form: a template-matching analysis. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[52]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Acceleration carries the local inversion effect in biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[53]  F. Simion,et al.  A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Stimulus magnification equates identification and discrimination of biological motion across the visual field , 2008, Vision Research.

[55]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[56]  Eric Hiris,et al.  Temporal properties in masking biological motion , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[58]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor , 2005, Vision Research.

[59]  M. Thirkettle,et al.  Contributions of form, motion and task to biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[60]  P. Sinha,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  Alan L. F. Lee,et al.  A comparison of global motion perception using a multiple-aperture stimulus. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[62]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[63]  Amelia R Hunt,et al.  Disorganizing biological motion. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[64]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  Chang-Bing Huang,et al.  Transitions between Central and Peripheral Vision Create Spatial/Temporal Distortions: A Hypothesis Concerning the Perceived Break of the Curveball , 2010, PloS one.

[66]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  The local inversion effect in biological motion perception is acceleration-based , 2010 .

[67]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  Perceptual and computational analysis of critical features for biological motion. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[68]  Harold E. Bedell,et al.  Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli , 2007, Vision Research.

[69]  Z. Kourtzi,et al.  Linking form and motion in the primate brain , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks , 2006, Current Biology.

[71]  Zili Liu,et al.  Computing dynamic classification images from correlation maps. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[72]  P.-J. Hsieh,et al.  The infinite regress illusion reveals faulty integration of local and global motion signals , 2006, Vision Research.

[73]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  PII: 0042-6989(95)00264-2 , 1997 .