Method and Test Course for the Evaluation of Industrial Exoskeletons

In recent years, the trend for implementing exoskeletons in industrial workplaces has significantly increased. A variety of systems have been developed to support different tasks, body parts, and movements. As no standardized procedure for evaluating industrial exoskeletons is currently available, conducted laboratory and field tests with different setups and methodologies aim to provide evidence of, e.g., the support for selected isolated activities. Accordingly, a comparison between exoskeletons and their workplace applicability proves to be challenging. In order to address this issue, this paper presents a generic method and modular test course for evaluating industrial exoskeletons: First, the seven-phase model proposes steps for the comprehensive evaluation of exoskeletons. Second, the test course comprises a quick check of the system’s operational requirements as well as workstations for an application-related evaluation of exoskeletons’ (short-term) effects. Due to the vastness and heterogeneity of possible application scenarios, the test course offers a pool of modular configurable stations or tasks, and thus enables a guided self-evaluation for different protagonists. Finally, several exemplary exoskeletons supporting varying body regions passed the test course to evaluate and reflect its representativity and suitability as well as to derive discernible trends regarding the applicability and effectiveness of exoskeleton types.

[1]  Frank Krause,et al.  Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load , 2016, Ergonomics.

[2]  José Luis Pons Rovira,et al.  Benchmarking Human Likeness of Bipedal Robot Locomotion: State of the Art and Future Trends , 2020, Metrics of Sensory Motor Coordination and Integration in Robots and Animals.

[3]  Jörg Franke,et al.  Towards a Framework for Evaluating Exoskeletons , 2019, Production at the leading edge of technology.

[4]  Robert Weidner,et al.  Distinguishing Support Technologies. A General Scheme and Its Application to Exoskeletons , 2018, Developing Support Technologies.

[5]  T. Luger,et al.  Using a Back Exoskeleton During Industrial and Functional Tasks—Effects on Muscle Activity, Posture, Performance, Usability, and Wearer Discomfort in a Laboratory Trial , 2021, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Claudia Latella,et al.  Objective and Subjective Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Overhead Work , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Eiichi Yoshida,et al.  Standard Performance Test of Wearable Robots for Lumbar Support , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[8]  Robert Bogue,et al.  Exoskeletons - a review of industrial applications , 2018, Ind. Robot.

[9]  Kevin Desbrosses,et al.  Occupational Exoskeletons: Overview of Their Benefits and Limitations in Preventing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders , 2019, IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors.

[10]  R. Weidner,et al.  Leitmerkmale und Vorgehen einer Implementierung von Exoskeletten , 2021 .

[11]  Han Houdijk,et al.  Reliability of a battery of tests for functional evaluation of trunk exoskeletons. , 2020, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Mathias Keil,et al.  Subjective Evaluation of a Passive Industrial Exoskeleton for Lower-back Support: A Field Study in the Automotive Sector , 2019, IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors.

[13]  Stephen Fox,et al.  Exoskeletons , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[14]  J. L. Pons,et al.  EUROBENCH: Preparing Robots for the Real World , 2018, Biosystems & Biorobotics.

[15]  Alessandro Scano,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of the Proto-MATE: A Novel Ergonomic Upper-Limb Exoskeleton to Reduce Workers' Physical Strain , 2020, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[16]  T. Luger,et al.  The influence of using exoskeletons during occupational tasks on acute physical stress and strain compared to no exoskeleton - A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2021, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  M. Christian,et al.  Development of a Standardized Ergonomic Assessment Methodology for Exoskeletons Using Both Subjective and Objective Measurement Techniques , 2019, AHFE.

[18]  H. Houdijk,et al.  The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance in healthy individuals. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  Alberto Ranavolo,et al.  The Effects of Upper-Body Exoskeletons on Human Metabolic Cost and Thermal Response during Work Tasks—A Systematic Review , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[20]  Svantje T. Kähler,et al.  Cognitive Effects of Physical Support Systems: A Study of Resulting Effects for Tasks at and above Head Level Using Exoskeletons , 2020, Annals of Scientific Society for Assembly, Handling and Industrial Robotics.

[21]  Pengzhan Liu,et al.  Kinematics and Dynamics Analysis of a 3-DOF Upper-Limb Exoskeleton with an Internally Rotated Elbow Joint , 2018 .

[22]  Jens Peter Wulfsberg,et al.  Human Hybrid Robot: a new concept for supporting manual assembly tasks , 2013, Prod. Eng..

[23]  Maury A Nussbaum,et al.  Influences of different exoskeleton designs and tool mass on physical demands and performance in a simulated overhead drilling task. , 2019, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  Juri Taborri,et al.  BEAT: Balance Evaluation Automated Testbed for the standardization of balance assessment in human wearing exoskeleton , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT.

[25]  Divya Srinivasan,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Passive Back-Support Exoskeletons in a Precision Manual Assembly Task: “Expected” Effects on Trunk Muscle Activity, Perceived Exertion, and Task Performance , 2020, Hum. Factors.

[26]  R. Weidner,et al.  Methodologies for evaluating exoskeletons with industrial applications , 2021, Ergonomics.

[27]  M. de Looze,et al.  Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review , 2020, Ergonomics.

[28]  Roger Bostelman,et al.  Towards Standard Exoskeleton Test Methods for Load Handling , 2019, 2019 Wearable Robotics Association Conference (WearRAcon).