Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Gary S Collins | Sally Hopewell | Douglas G Altman | Isabelle Boutron | Larissa Shamseer | Ly-Mee Yu | Jonathan Cook | G. Collins | I. Boutron | L. Shamseer | D. Altman | S. Hopewell | Ly-Mee Yu | M. Shanyinde | R. Wharton | J. Cook | Milensu Shanyinde | Rose Wharton | Larissa Shamseer
[1] J. PérezMartín,et al. [International Committee of Medical Journal Editors]. , 2008, Revista alergia Mexico.
[2] Jane Friedman. Suspended judgment , 2013 .
[3] J Croat Med,et al. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals , 1988, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.
[4] T. Jefferson,et al. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[5] David Moher,et al. Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa , 2012, Systematic Reviews.
[6] Suspended judgment. Editorial peer review: let us put it on trial. , 1992, Controlled clinical trials.
[7] D. Moher,et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[8] J. Carpenter,et al. Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[9] Sara Schroter,et al. What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? , 2008, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[10] D. Altman,et al. Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[11] Douglas G Altman,et al. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. , 2010, JAMA.
[12] Gordon H Guyatt,et al. Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[13] Erik Cobo,et al. Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial , 2007, PloS one.
[14] D. Rennie,et al. Masking author identity in peer review: what factors influence masking success? PEER Investigators. , 1998, JAMA.
[15] R Smith,et al. Opening up BMJ peer review , 1999, BMJ.
[16] Kay Dickersin,et al. What do the JAMA editors say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of editorial discussion , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.
[17] D. Ratner,et al. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi‐rater study , 2011, The British journal of dermatology.
[18] Sun Huh,et al. Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice , 2008, Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.
[19] Sally Hopewell,et al. The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[20] A. Urrutia,et al. Efecto de la revisión estadística en la calidad de los manuscritos publicados en Medicina Clínica: estudio aleatorizado , 2003 .
[21] William M. Tierney,et al. Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care? , 2010, PloS one.
[22] N. Black,et al. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? , 1998, JAMA.