Enhancing the Supply Chain Performance by Integrating Simulated and Physical Agents into Organizational Information Systems

As the business environment gets more complicated, organizations must be able to respond to the business changes and adjust themselves quickly to gain their competitive advantages. This study proposes an integrated agent system, called SPA, which coordinates simulated and physical agents to provide an efficient way for organizations to meet the challenges in managing supply chains. In the integrated framework, physical agents coordinate with inter-organizations' physical agents to form workable business processes and detect the variations occurring in the outside world, whereas simulated agents model and analyze the what-if scenarios to support physical agents in making decisions. This study uses a supply chain that produces digital still cameras as an example to demonstrate how the SPA works. In this example, individual information systems of the involved companies equip with the SPA and the entire supply chain is modeled as a hierarchical object oriented Petri nets. The SPA here applies the modified AGNES data clustering technique and the moving average approach to help each firm generalize customers' past demand patterns and forecast their future demands. The amplitude of forecasting errors caused by bullwhip effects is used as a metric to evaluate the degree that the SPA affects the supply chain performance. The experimental results show that the SPA benefits the entire supply chain by reducing the bullwhip effects and forecasting errors in a dynamic environment.

[1]  Paul Davidsson,et al.  Agent Based Social Simulation: A Computer Science View , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[2]  Shyh-ming Lin,et al.  Dynamic business process formation by integrating simulated and physical agent systems , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[3]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[4]  M. Jaksic,et al.  Bullwhip Effect in a Supply Chain , 2007 .

[5]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  A framework for supply chain performance measurement , 2004 .

[6]  Warren H. Hausman,et al.  Supply Chain Performance Metrics , 2004 .

[7]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[8]  R. Popescu-Zeletin,et al.  MAGNA-a DPE-based platform for mobile agents in electronic service markets , 1997, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems. ISADS 97.

[9]  Steven Orla Kimbrough,et al.  Computers play the beer game: can artificial agents manage supply chains? , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Janis Grabis,et al.  Application of multi-steps forecasting for restraining the bullwhip effect and improving inventory performance under autoregressive demand , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Richard D. Metters,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains , 1997 .

[12]  Arun Kumar,et al.  An agent-based framework for collaborative negotiation in the global manufacturing supply chain network , 2006 .

[13]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Business Process Management, Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies , 2000 .

[14]  C. D. Keen,et al.  A METHODOLOGY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIMULATION MODELS USING OBJECT-ORIENTED PETRI NETS , 2007 .

[15]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Reducing the bullwhip effect by means of intelligent, soft computing methods , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Pietro Terna Simulation tools for social scientists: Building agent-based models with SWARM , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[17]  Ulrich Wilhelm Thonemann,et al.  Production, Manufacturing and Logistics Improving supply-chain performance by sharing advance demand information , 2002 .

[18]  Nelson Minar,et al.  The Swarm Simulation System: A Toolkit for Building Multi-Agent Simulations , 1996 .

[19]  L. LeeHau,et al.  Information Distortion in a Supply Chain , 1997 .

[20]  Stanley J. Rosenschein,et al.  An architecture for adaptive intelligent systems , 1996 .

[21]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  An Architecture for Adaptive Intelligent Systems , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[22]  Nils B. Weidmann,et al.  Technical Note: Evaluating Java Development Kits for Agent-Based Modeling , 2005, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[23]  José Carlos Brustoloni,et al.  Autonomous Agents: Characterization and Requirements , 1991 .

[24]  Marc Wouters,et al.  Designing a performance measurement system: A case study , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  P. Sopp Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[26]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Reengineering the Order Fulfillment Process in Supply Chain Networks , 1996 .

[27]  D. Garvin Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[28]  D. Simchi-Levi,et al.  The impact of exponential smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect , 2000 .

[29]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  Agent-Oriented Supply-Chain Management , 2000 .

[30]  Thomas Wagner,et al.  TÆMS agents: enabling dynamic distributed supply chain management , 2003, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[31]  Xuan F. Zha,et al.  An object-oriented knowledge based Petri net approach to intelligent integration of design and assembly planning , 2000, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[32]  Ken Platts,et al.  Supplier Logistics Performance Measurement in the Automotive Industry , 2002 .

[33]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages: A Survey , 1995, ECAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages.

[34]  L. Foner What''s an Agent, Anyway? A Sociological Case Study. MIT Media Lab , 1997 .

[35]  Frank Y. Chen,et al.  Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information.: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information. , 2000 .

[36]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Simulation of Order Fulfillment in Divergent Assembly Supply Chains , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[37]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Artificial life meets entertainment: lifelike autonomous agents , 1995, CACM.

[39]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  The impact of information enrichment on the Bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  S. Disney,et al.  On variance amplification in a three-echelon supply chain with minimum mean square error forecasting , 2022 .

[41]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[43]  Fu-Ren Lin,et al.  Integrating multi-agent negotiation to resolve constraints in fulfilling supply chain orders , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[44]  C. A. Petri Fundamentals of a Theory of Asynchronous Information Flow , 1962, IFIP Congress.

[45]  Morris A. Cohen,et al.  The Stabilizing Effect of Inventory in Supply Chains , 1998, Oper. Res..

[46]  Christopher C. Yang,et al.  Applying Multi Agent Technology to Supply Chain Management , 2000, J. Electron. Commer. Res..