Innovations to expand drone data collection and analysis for rangeland monitoring

In adaptive management of rangelands, monitoring is the vital link that connects management actions with on-the-ground changes. Traditional field monitoring methods can provide detailed information for assessing the health of rangelands, but cost often limits monitoring locations to a few key areas or random plots. Remotely sensed imagery, and drone-based imagery in particular, can observe larger areas than field methods while retaining high enough spatial resolution to estimate many rangeland indicators of interest. However, the geographic extent of drone imagery products is often limited to a few hectares (for resolution ≤ 1 cm) due to image collection and processing constraints. Overcoming these limitations would allow for more extensive observations and more frequent monitoring. We developed a workflow to increase the extent and speed of acquiring, processing, and analyzing drone imagery for repeated monitoring of two common indicators of interest to rangeland managers: vegetation cover and vegetation heights. By incorporating a suite of existing technologies in drones (real-time kinematic GPS), data processing (automation with Python scripts, high performance computing), and cloud-based analysis (Google Earth Engine), we greatly increased the efficiency of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting high volumes of drone imagery for rangeland monitoring. End-to-end, our workflow took 30 days, while a workflow without these innovations was estimated to require 141 days to complete. The technology around drones and image analysis is rapidly advancing which is making high volume workflows easier to implement. Larger quantities of monitoring data will significantly improve our understanding of the impact management actions have on land processes and ecosystem traits.

[1]  Andrew M. Cunliffe,et al.  Ultra-fine grain landscape-scale quantification of dryland vegetation structure with drone-acquired structure-from-motion photogrammetry , 2016 .

[2]  Mark W. Smith,et al.  Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography , 2016 .

[3]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Modeling the World from Internet Photo Collections , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  Craig A Wissler,et al.  Santa rita experimental range digital database: User's guide , 2002 .

[5]  Carlos Castillo,et al.  Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry – merits, limits and developments of a promising tool for geoscientists , 2015 .

[6]  Adam J. Mathews,et al.  Assessment of Image-Based Point Cloud Products to Generate a Bare Earth Surface and Estimate Canopy Heights in a Woodland Ecosystem , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[7]  S. Robson,et al.  Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment , 2016 .

[8]  Jason W. Karl,et al.  Integrating drone imagery with existing rangeland monitoring programs , 2020, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[9]  Jeffrey K. Gillan,et al.  Estimating Forage Utilization with Drone-Based Photogrammetric Point Clouds , 2019, Rangeland Ecology & Management.

[10]  Jeffrey E. Herrick,et al.  Consistent Indicators and Methods and a Scalable Sample Design to Meet Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring Information Needs Across Scales , 2011 .

[11]  A. Rango,et al.  Image Processing and Classification Procedures for Analysis of Sub-decimeter Imagery Acquired with an Unmanned Aircraft over Arid Rangelands , 2011 .

[12]  Seth M. Munson,et al.  Invasive buffelgrass detection using high‐resolution satellite and UAV imagery on Google Earth Engine , 2019, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

[13]  Jan Skaloud,et al.  A micro-UAV with the capability of direct georeferencing , 2013 .

[14]  P. Sundt The statistical power of rangeland monitoring data. , 2002 .

[15]  Enoc Sanz-Ablanedo,et al.  Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Irene Marzolff,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Monitoring Soil Erosion in Morocco , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[17]  P. Hardin,et al.  Detecting Squarrose Knapweed (Centaurea virgata Lam. Ssp. squarrosa Gugl.) Using a Remotely Piloted Vehicle: A Utah Case Study , 2007 .

[18]  David E. Hudak,et al.  Open OnDemand: HPC for Everyone , 2019, ISC Workshops.

[19]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Spatially Explicit Representation of State-and-Transition Models , 2012 .

[20]  Jason W. Karl,et al.  Fine-Resolution Repeat Topographic Surveying of Dryland Landscapes Using UAS-Based Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry: Assessing Accuracy and Precision against Traditional Ground-Based Erosion Measurements , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Oliver Q. Whaley,et al.  Identifying species from the air: UAVs and the very high resolution challenge for plant conservation , 2017, PloS one.

[22]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[23]  D. T. Booth,et al.  Art to Science: Tools for Greater Objectivity in Resource Monitoring , 2011 .

[24]  Robert P. Breckenridge,et al.  Comparison of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Platforms for Assessing Vegetation Cover in Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystems , 2011 .

[25]  Andriamasinoro Lalaina Herinaina Andriamandroso,et al.  Mapping and Monitoring of Biomass and Grazing in Pasture with an Unmanned Aerial System , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[26]  N. West Theoretical Underpinnings of Rangeland Monitoring , 2003 .

[27]  Gianfranco Forlani,et al.  Quality Assessment of DSMs Produced from UAV Flights Georeferenced with On-Board RTK Positioning , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[28]  N. Sayre,et al.  Social and Legal Effects on Monitoring and Adaptive Management: A Case Study of National Forest Grazing Allotments, 1927–2007 , 2013 .

[29]  M. Louhaichi,et al.  Spatially Located Platform and Aerial Photography for Documentation of Grazing Impacts on Wheat , 2001 .

[30]  Maria E. Fernandez-Gimenez,et al.  Arizona Permittee and Land Management Agency Employee Attitudes Toward Rangeland Monitoring by Permittees , 2005 .

[31]  C. Hugenholtz,et al.  Spatial Accuracy of UAV-Derived Orthoimagery and Topography: Comparing Photogrammetric Models Processed with Direct Geo-Referencing and Ground Control Points , 2016 .

[32]  Michael Dixon,et al.  Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone , 2017 .

[33]  Daniel H. Thornton,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems measure structural habitat features for wildlife across multiple scales , 2017 .