Deterioration in anthropometric measures over six years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Objective: To evaluate the progression of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) as a function of disease duration and exercise frequency in a group of patients who were observed and followed up for six years. Methods: Detailed measurement of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar mobility together with measurements of posture and function were carried out in 28 patients (23 men, five women, mean age at final assessment 49.9 years) at two points separated by a period of six years. Anamnestic data on frequency of specific back and general exercises were also ascertained. Results: A significant deterioration was found in: ▪ Combined cervical rotation (initial mean 90°, final mean 36°). ▪ Cervical flexion/extension (66° to 42°). ▪ Combined cervical side flexion (41° to 24°). ▪ Tragus-to-wall distance (170 mm to 224 mm). ▪ Chest expansion (60 mm to 20 mm). ▪ Combined lumbar side-flexion (49 mm to 18 mm). ▪ Modified Schober test (37 mm to 24 mm). Although functional deterioration occurred (disability score 1.33 to 1.59) this was not significant (p = 0.07). Anthropometric deterioration occurred independent of initial disease duration and reported frequency of exercise. Conclusion: These initial findings suggest that patients with AS experience progressive loss of movement independently of the duration of the disease and the reported frequency of unsupervised exercise. Further data are required using a wider spectrum of disease expression and more explicit information on spinal exercises, both supervised and unsupervised.

[1]  A. Swannell The case against the value of exercise in the long-term management of ankylosing spondylitis , 1988 .

[2]  H. Baddeley,et al.  Neck movements in ankylosing spondylitis and their responses to physiotherapy. , 1978, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Cost effectiveness of group physical therapy compared to individualized therapy for ankylosing spondylitis. A randomized controlled trial. , 1994, The Journal of rheumatology.

[4]  A. Calin,et al.  The natural history of ankylosing spondylitis. Does it burn out? , 1993, The Journal of rheumatology.

[5]  M. Liang,et al.  Sensitivity of anthropometric techniques for clinical trials in ankylosing spondylitis. , 1989, British journal of rheumatology.

[6]  E. Lubrano,et al.  An audit of anthropometric measurements by medical and physiotherapy staff in patients with ankylosing spondylitis , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[7]  M. Chamberlain,et al.  A Randomised Trial of Three Different Physiotherapy Regimes in Ankylosing Spondylitis , 1996 .

[8]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  The effects of comprehensive home physiotherapy and supervision on patients with ankylosing spondylitis--an 8-month followup. , 1994, The Journal of rheumatology.

[9]  J. Suni,et al.  Effect of physiotherapy on spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis. , 1992, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[10]  M. Jayson,et al.  The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain , 1993 .

[11]  M. Chamberlain,et al.  Functional assessment in ankylosing spondylitis: evaluation of a new self-administered questionnaire and correlation with anthropometric variables. , 1994, British journal of rheumatology.

[12]  V. Wright,et al.  Normal range of spinal mobility. An objective clinical study. , 1971, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  N. Bellamy Prognosis in the Rheumatic Diseases , 2012, Springer Netherlands.

[14]  J. Rubenstein,et al.  The natural disease course of ankylosing spondylitis. , 1983, Arthritis and rheumatism.