Experience with voice recognition in surgical pathology at a large academic multi-institutional center.

There are few reports of institutional use of voice recognition technology in clinical practice. We describe our experience with voice recognition-integrated synoptic-like dictation, associating templates with key spoken phrases, that we have used in gross examination of common specimens and as a major component of our workflow since 2001. The primary application is VoiceOver Enterprise (Voicebrook, Lake Success, NY), which uses Dragon NaturallySpeaking Medical Edition (Nuance Communications, Burlington, MA) as its speech engine. This integrates with the anatomic pathology laboratory information system (APLIS) and other applications, such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft, Redmond, WA). The largest user group, pathology assistants, mainly dictates biopsy reports, numbering approximately 210,000 specimens since 2001. The technology has been useful in our anatomic pathology workflow and provided a good return on investment, including marked improvements in turnaround time, results standardization, error reduction, and cost savings. The most helpful features of the software are templating, the seamless integration with APLIS, and the voice command creation tools.

[1]  Martin Westhofen,et al.  Free-Text Data Entry by Speech Recognition Software and its Impact on Clinical Routine , 2006, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[2]  H L Bleich,et al.  Computerized radiologic reporting with voice data-entry. , 1981, Radiology.

[3]  K. White.  Speech recognition implementation in radiology , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[4]  Richard L. Morin,et al.  The implementation of speech recognition in an electronic radiology practice , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[5]  E. vanSonnenberg,et al.  Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting: advantages, disadvantages, and impact. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Robert M. Issenman,et al.  Use of Voice Recognition Software in an Outpatient Pediatric Specialty Practice , 2004, Pediatrics.

[7]  Tomi Kauppinen,et al.  Improvement of Report Workflow and Productivity Using Speech Recognition—A Follow-up Study , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  R. G. Zick,et al.  Voice recognition software versus a traditional transcription service for physician charting in the ED. , 2001, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  Stephen M. Borowitz,et al.  Case Report: Computer-based Speech Recognition as an Alternative to Medical Transcription , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Tomi Kauppinen,et al.  Improvement of Report Workflow and Productivity Using Speech Recognition—A Follow-up Study , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[11]  E C Klatt,et al.  Voice-activated dictation for autopsy pathology. , 1991, Computers in biology and medicine.

[12]  Peter J. Haug,et al.  Contribution of a speech recognition system to a computerized pneumonia guideline in the emergency department , 2000, AMIA.

[13]  P Kijewski,et al.  Voice recognition in radiology reporting. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Lawrence M. Davis,et al.  Voice Recognition Dictation: Radiologist as Transcriptionist , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[15]  Ned Kock,et al.  An analysis of the implementation and impact of speech-recognition technology in the healthcare sector. , 2004, Perspectives in health information management.

[16]  Walter H Henricks,et al.  The Utility and Cost Effectiveness of Voice Recognition Technology in Surgical Pathology , 2002, Modern Pathology.

[17]  Maamoun M Al-Aynati,et al.  Comparison of voice-automated transcription and human transcription in generating pathology reports. , 2003, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.