High rate of tibial debonding and failure in a popular knee replacement

Aims Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common and safe orthopaedic procedure. Zimmer Biomet's NexGen is the second most popular brand of implant used in the UK. The primary cause of revision after the first year is aseptic loosening. We present our experience of using this implant, with significant concerns around its performance with regards early aseptic loosening of the tibial component. Methods A retrospective, single-surgeon review was carried out of all of the NexGen Legacy Posterior Stabilized (LPS) TKAs performed in this institute. The specific model used for the index procedures was the NexGen Complete Knee System (Legacy Knee-Posterior Stabilized LPS-Flex Articular Surface, LPS-Flex Femoral Component Option, and Stemmed Nonaugmentable Tibial Component Option). Results Between 2013 and 2016, 352 NexGen TKAs were carried out on 331 patients. A total of 62 TKAs have been revised to date, giving an all-cause revision rate of 17.6% at a minimum of five years. Three of these revisions were due to infection. Overall, 59 of the revisions were performed for aseptic loosening (16.7%) of the tibial component. The tibial component was removed intraoperatively without instrumentation due to significant tibial debonding between the implant-cement interface. Conclusion While overall, we believe that early aseptic loosening is multi-factorial in nature, the significantly high aseptic revision rate, as seen by an experienced fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon, has led us to believe that there is a fundamental issue with this NexGen implant design. Continued implant surveillance and rigorous review across all regions using this particular implant is warranted based on the concerning findings described here. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(6):495–501.

[1]  W. Blakeney,et al.  Loosening of tibia baseplates after total knee arthroplasty: Evaluation of pull-out strength of tibia baseplate-cement Interface. , 2021, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  T. Joyce,et al.  Tibial tray debonding from the cement mantle is associated with deformation of the backside of polyethylene tibial inserts. , 2021, The bone & joint journal.

[3]  M. Jenkinson,et al.  Significant differences in rates of aseptic loosening between two variations of a popular total knee arthroplasty design , 2021, International Orthopaedics.

[4]  K. Royse,et al.  The Association Between Cement Viscosity and Revision Risk After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2021, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  Adrian D Hinman,et al.  Modular Tibial Stem Use and Risk of Revision for Aseptic Loosening in Cemented Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  B. S. Moon,et al.  Replacement , 1980, Definitions.

[7]  T. J. Walker,et al.  Factors affecting aseptic loosening in primary total knee replacements: an in vitro study , 2020, Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics.

[8]  W. Long,et al.  Reduced Aseptic Loosening With Fully Cemented Short-Stemmed Tibial Components in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  D. Nam,et al.  Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using High-Viscosity Cement is Associated With Higher Odds of Revision for Aseptic Loosening. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  E. Masterson,et al.  High rate of tibial debonding and failure in a popular knee replacement: A cause for concern. , 2019, Knee (Oxford).

[11]  L. Barnsley,et al.  Detection of aseptic loosening in total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Skeletal Radiology.

[12]  L. Lidgren,et al.  Higher Risk of Loosening for a Four-Pegged TKA Tibial Baseplate Than for a Stemmed One: A Register-based Study. , 2019, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[13]  O. Furnes,et al.  Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements , 2017, Acta orthopaedica.

[14]  Michael A Mont,et al.  Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  R. Barrack,et al.  Failure at the Tibial Cement-Implant Interface With the Use of High-Viscosity Cement in Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  N. Pujol,et al.  Mid-term survivorship of Mini-keel™ versus Standard keel in total knee replacements: Differences in the rate of revision for aseptic loosening. , 2016, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[17]  K. Hazelwood,et al.  Case series report: Early cement-implant interface fixation failure in total knee replacement. , 2015, The Knee.

[18]  R. Mújica-Mota,et al.  The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset. , 2015, The bone & joint journal.

[19]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: a review of pathogenetic mechanisms. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[21]  S. Bini,et al.  Does pre-coating total knee tibial implants affect the risk of aseptic revision? , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[22]  F. Shannon,et al.  Cementing techniques for the tibial component in primary total knee replacement. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[23]  M. Pagnano,et al.  Aseptic Tibial Debonding as a Cause of Early Failure in a Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty Design , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  S. Sporer,et al.  Early aseptic loosening with a precoated low-profile tibial component: a case series. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[25]  J. Bellemans,et al.  Cementing the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: which technique is the best? , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  P. Neyret,et al.  Revision after early aseptic failures in primary total knee arthroplasty , 2008, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[27]  R. Bourne,et al.  Cost Effectiveness of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.