Aeroelastic Effects of Spinning Missiles

.The accurate computation of forces and moments is of paramount importance in the computation of the maneuvering response of an aerospace vehicle, particularly for spinning missiles. For spinning missiles, the combination of body spin and angle of attack creates a force, called the Magnus force, at right angles to the lift vector. This force induces a moment that can perturb the dynamic stability of the missile, and flight control of the vehicle is no longer ensured. The solution for axisymmetric configurations can be predicted with steady-state algorithms. The addition of control surfaces creates an additional opposing lateral force and the flow is no longer steady and unsteady methods must be used to compute the solution. The purpose of the current work is to examine the aeroelastic effects on the aerodynamic performance of a spinning missile with dithering canards utilizing a fully-coupled computational aeroelastic approach. The nonlinearity of the flow field (e.g. moving shocks) and the complicated aerodynamic interactions at the canard- and finbody junctures necessitates the use of a computational aeroelasticity approach.

[1]  T. Cebeci,et al.  A general method for calculating aeros-structure interaction on aircraft configurations , 1996 .

[2]  Daniel H. Platus AEROELASTIC STABILITY OF SLENDER, SPINNING MISSILES , 1992 .

[3]  Maynard C. Sandford,et al.  Steady pressure measurements on an Aeroelastic Research Wing (ARW-2) , 1994 .

[4]  S. Brown,et al.  Displacement extrapolations for CFD+CSM aeroelastic analysis , 1997 .

[5]  David L. Marcum,et al.  Numerical Simulation of a Spinning Missile with Dithering Canards Using Unstructured Grids , 2004 .

[6]  Timothy J. Barth,et al.  The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes , 1989 .

[7]  D. Whitfield,et al.  Discretized Newton-relaxation solution of high resolution flux-difference split schemes , 1991 .

[8]  Daniel J. Lesieutre,et al.  MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF MISSILE CONFIGURATIONS AND FIN PLANFORMS FOR IMPROVED PERFORMANCE , 1998 .

[9]  Maynard C. Sandford,et al.  Geometrical and structural properties of an Aeroelastic Research Wing (ARW-2) , 1989 .

[10]  David L. Marcum,et al.  Efficient Generation of High-Quality Unstructured Surface and Volume Grids , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[11]  K. Isogai,et al.  Transonic dip mechanism of flutter of a sweptback wing. II , 1981 .

[12]  Guru P. Guruswamy,et al.  Fluid-structural interactions using Navier-Stokes flow equations coupled with shell finite element structures , 1993 .

[13]  C. R. Ethier,et al.  A semi-torsional spring analogy model for updating unstructured meshes in 3D moving domains , 2005 .

[14]  Chunhua Sheng,et al.  An investigation of parallel implicit solution algorithms for incompressible flows on multielement unstructured topologies , 2000 .

[15]  J. Newman A Finite-Element Analysis of Fatigue Crack Closure , 1976 .

[16]  Carlo L. Bottasso,et al.  The ball-vertex method: a new simple spring analogy method for unstructured dynamic meshes , 2005 .

[17]  Seungmook Chae,et al.  Effect of Follower Forces on Aeroelastic Stability of Flexible Structures , 2004 .

[18]  Gecheng Zha,et al.  Flutter Prediction Based on Fully Coupled Fluid-Structural Interactions , 2004 .

[19]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Fully-implicit time-marching aeroelastic solutions , 1994 .

[20]  T. A. Byrdsong,et al.  Close-Range Photogrammetric Measurement of Static Deflections for an Aeroelastic Supercritical Wing , 1990 .

[21]  Robert M. Bennett,et al.  Time-marching transonic flutter solutions including angle-of-attack effects , 1983 .

[22]  P. Tallec,et al.  Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity , 1998 .

[23]  Eugene L. Fleeman Tactical Missile Design , 2001 .

[24]  Her Mann Tsai,et al.  Calculation of Wing Flutter by a Coupled Fluid-Structure Method , 2001 .

[25]  J. Cai,et al.  Static aero-elastic computation with a coupled CFD and CSD method , 2001 .

[26]  P. A. Newman,et al.  Efficient nonlinear static aeroelastic wing analysis , 1999 .

[27]  W Sproles Darrell,et al.  Computer Program To Obtain Ordinates for NACA Airfoils , 1996 .

[28]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  A vectorized particle tracer for unstructured grids , 1990 .

[29]  Koji Isogai,et al.  On the Transonic-Dip Mechanism of Flutter of a Sweptback Wing , 1979 .

[30]  J. Batina UNSTEADY EULER ALGORITHM WITH UNSTRUCTURED DYNAMIC MESH FOR COMPLEX – AIRCRAFT AERODYNAMIC ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[31]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .