Thermal and mechanical properties of gypsum–cement foam concrete: effects of surfactant

The mineral foams studied were mainly composed of a reactive, partially anhydrous calcium sulphate (90%) and Portland cement (10%), mixed with a low water-to-binder ratio (W/B = .35) leading to a highly concentrated suspension. The foaming method used allowed a wide foam density range (250 < ρ < 820 kg/m3) to be obtained after hardening and drying, with the same mineral suspension composition. To ensure that foam formed and remained stable until the material had set, six surfactants were chosen. The influence of the surfactants on paste properties in the fresh state was evaluated and the thermal and mechanical performances of gypsum–cement products (foamed and unfoamed) were analysed. The thermal conductivity of gypsum–cement foams evolved linearly with density but compressive strength values were widely dispersed and depended on the porous structure, which was strongly dependent on surfactant type and content. The performance levels of gypsum–cement foams were compared with those of lightweight foam concrete from litterature. The most efficient surfactants and the optimum content range leading to the best thermomechanical compromise were identified. They ensured a minimal compressive strength of 2 MPa, and thermal conductivity lower than .2 W/(m.K).

[1]  D. Misra.  Characterization and Simulation , 2018 .

[2]  Shuzhou Wang,et al.  Utilization of phosphogypsum for the preparation of α‐calcium sulfate hemihydrate in chloride‐free solution under atmospheric pressure , 2018 .

[3]  K. J. Mysels,et al.  Critical Micelle Concentrations of Aqueous Surfactant Systems , 2018 .

[4]  C. Lanos,et al.  Effect of multiphasic structure of binder particles on the mechanical properties of a gypsum-based material , 2016 .

[5]  A. Perrot,et al.  Rheological properties of calcium sulfate suspensions , 2015 .

[6]  C. Lanos,et al.  A new calcium sulfate-based plaster composed of composite particles , 2015 .

[7]  Keun-Hyeok Yang,et al.  Tests on high-performance aerated concrete with a lower density , 2015 .

[8]  Christophe Lanos,et al.  Extension of Spread-Slump Formulae for Yield Stress Evaluation , 2013 .

[9]  Martyn Jones,et al.  Characterization and simulation of microstructure and thermal properties of foamed concrete , 2013 .

[10]  D. Panesar.  Cellular concrete properties and the effect of synthetic and protein foaming agents , 2013 .

[11]  Zhihua Hu,et al.  Utilization of phosphogypsum for the preparation of non-autoclaved aerated concrete , 2013 .

[12]  Bing Chen,et al.  A novel lightweight concrete-fabrication and its thermal and mechanical properties , 2013 .

[13]  Augusto Gomes,et al.  Compressive strength evaluation of structural lightweight concrete by non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity method. , 2013, Ultrasonics.

[14]  B. Łaźniewska-Piekarczyk.  The influence of selected new generation admixtures on the workability, air-voids parameters and frost-resistance of self compacting concrete , 2012 .

[15]  Meral Ozel,et al.  Thermal performance and optimum insulation thickness of building walls with different structure materials , 2011 .

[16]  Bjørn Petter Jelle,et al.  Traditional, state-of-the-art and future thermal building insulation materials and solutions Prope , 2011 .

[17]  C. Lanos,et al.  Mineral foams with improved performances , 2011 .

[18]  Othuman Mydin,et al.  Lightweight foamed concrete (LFC) thermal and mechanical properties at elevated temperatures and its application to composite walling system , 2010 .

[19]  Youyin Jing,et al.  Application of improved grey relational projection method to evaluate sustainable building envelope performance , 2010 .

[20]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Relative assessment of density and stability of foam produced with four synthetic surfactants , 2010 .

[21]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  A classification of studies on properties of foam concrete , 2009 .

[22]  Agis M. Papadopoulos,et al.  Environmental performance evaluation of thermal insulation materials and its impact on the building , 2007 .

[23]  Eric Wirquin,et al.  Yield Stress and Viscosity Equations for Mortars and Self-Consolidating Concrete , 2007 .

[24]  Aivars Aboltins,et al.  Measurements of heat transfer of multi-layered wall construction with foam gypsum , 2007 .

[25]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Air‐void characterisation of foam concrete , 2007 .

[26]  Martyn Jones,et al.  Heat of Hydration in Foamed Concrete: Effect of Mix Constituents and Plastic Density , 2006 .

[27]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  “Fifty-cent rheometer” for yield stress measurements: From slump to spreading flow , 2005 .

[28]  James H. Pospisil,et al.  A method for assessment of the freeze-thaw resistance of preformed foam cellular concrete , 2004 .

[29]  E. Kearsley,et al.  The effect of porosity on the strength of foamed concrete , 2002 .

[30]  Adnan Çolak,et al.  Density and strength characteristics of foamed gypsum , 2000 .

[31]  Helmut Weigler,et al.  Structural lightweight aggregate concrete with reduced density— lightweight aggregate foamed concrete , 1980 .

[32]  Ali J. Hamad,et al.  Materials, Production, Properties and Application of Aerated Lightweight Concrete: Review , 2014 .

[33]  Omer Kaynakli,et al.  A review of the economical and optimum thermal insulation thickness for building applications , 2012 .

[34]  N. Ghafoori,et al.  Air-Entrained Self-Consolidating Concrete: A Study of Admixture Sources , 2012 .

[35]  Robert Černý,et al.  Lightweight gypsum composites: Design strategies for multi-functionality , 2011 .

[36]  Moray D. Newlands,et al.  Use of foamed concrete in construction : proceedings of the international conference held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK on 5 July 2005 , 2005 .

[37]  Fouad H. Fouad,et al.  Autoclaved aerated concrete : properties and structural design , 2005 .

[38]  P. Labossière,et al.  The Canadian Society for Civil Engineering , 1992 .