Prospecting the utility of a PMI/mannose selection system for the recovery of transgenic sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) plants

For the first time, the phosphomannose isomerase (PMI, EC 5.3.1.8)/mannose-based “positive” selection system has been used to obtain genetically engineered sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid var. CP72-2086) plants. Transgenic lines of sugarcane were obtained following biolistic transformation of embryogenic callus with an untranslatable sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) strain E coat protein (CP) gene and the Escherichia coli PMI gene manA, as the selectable marker gene. Postbombardment, transgenic callus was selectively proliferated on modified MS medium containing 13.6 μM 2,4-D, 20 g l−1 sucrose and 3 g l−1 mannose. Plant regeneration was obtained on MS basal medium with 2.5 μM TDZ under similar selection conditions, and the regenerants rooted on MS basal medium with 19.7 μM IBA, 20 g l−1 sucrose, and 1.5 g l−1 mannose. An increase in mannose concentration from permissive (1.5 g l−1) to selective (3 g l−1) conditions after 3 weeks improved the overall transformation efficiency by reducing the number of selection escapes. Thirty-four vigorously growing putative transgenic plants were successfully transplanted into the greenhouse. PCR and Southern blot analyses showed that 19 plants were manA-positive and 15 plants were CP-positive, while 13 independent transgenics contained both transgenes. Expression of manA in the transgenic plants was evaluated using a chlorophenol red assay and enzymatic analysis.

[1]  M. Manickavasagam,et al.  Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation and development of herbicide-resistant sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrids) using axillary buds , 2004, Plant Cell Reports.

[2]  J. Irvine,et al.  Effects of tissue type and promoter strength on transient GUS expression in sugarcane following particle bombardment , 1993, Plant Cell Reports.

[3]  Ariel Arencibia,et al.  Production of transgenic sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plants by intact cell electroporation , 1995, Plant Cell Reports.

[4]  M. Sedgley,et al.  GENETIC TRANSFORMATION AND HYBRIDIZATION , 2006 .

[5]  R. Birch,et al.  Transgenic sugarcane plants via microprojectile bombardment , 1992 .

[6]  T. Mirkov,et al.  Posttranscriptional gene silencing in transgenic sugarcane. Dissection Of homology-dependent virus resistance in a monocot that has a complex polyploid genome , 1999, Plant physiology.

[7]  M. O’Kennedy,et al.  Pearl millet transformation system using the positive selectable marker gene phosphomannose isomerase , 2004, Plant Cell Reports.

[8]  F. Okkels,et al.  The xylose isomerase gene from Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurogenes allows effective selection of transgenic plant cells using D-xylose as the selection agent , 1998, Plant Molecular Biology.

[9]  B. Tague,et al.  Phosphomannose isomerase: A versatile selectable marker forArabidopsis thaliana germ-line transformation , 2001, Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.

[10]  P. Hooykaas Transformation Mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens , 2004 .

[11]  M. Gallo-meagher,et al.  Effect of various growth regulators on shoot regeneration of sugarcane , 2001, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant.

[12]  D. Negrotto,et al.  The use of phosphomannose-isomerase as a selectable marker to recover transgenic maize plants (Zea mays L.) via Agrobacterium transformation , 2000, Plant Cell Reports.

[13]  X. Ye,et al.  Effective selection and regeneration of transgenic rice plants with mannose as selective agent , 2004, Molecular Breeding.

[14]  F. Okkels,et al.  Analysis of mannose selection used for transformation of sugar beet , 1998, Molecular Breeding.

[15]  P. Moore,et al.  Effective selection of transgenic papaya plants with the PMI/Man selection system , 2005, Plant Cell Reports.

[16]  Ya-ping Fu,et al.  Phosphomannose-isomerase (pmi) gene as a selectable marker for rice transformation via Agrobacterium , 2004 .

[17]  J. Stein,et al.  Mannose induces an endonuclease responsible for DNA laddering in plant cells. , 1999, Plant physiology.

[18]  L. Hernández,et al.  Transgenic sugarcane plants resistant to stem borer attack , 1997, Molecular Breeding.

[19]  R. Birch,et al.  Engineered detoxification confers resistance against a pathogenic bacterium , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Mukesh Jain,et al.  Agronomic Evaluation of Sugarcane Lines Transformed for Resistance to Sugarcane mosaic virus Strain E , 2005 .

[21]  J. Puonti-Kaerlas,et al.  PIG-mediated cassava transformation using positive and negative selection , 2000, Plant Cell Reports.

[22]  R. A. Evans,et al.  A mannose selection system for production of fertile transgenic maize plants from protoplasts , 2000, Plant Cell Reports.

[23]  J. Sheen,et al.  Sugar sensing in higher plants , 1997 .

[24]  G. A. de la Riva,et al.  Herbicide-resistant sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plants by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation , 1998, Planta.

[25]  M. Meghji,et al.  Phosphomannose isomerase: An efficient selectable marker for plant transformation , 2001, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant.

[26]  K. Jørgensen,et al.  A selection system for transgenic plants based on galactose as selective agent and a UDP-glucose:galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase gene as selective gene , 2003, Molecular Breeding.

[27]  S. Snyman,et al.  Refining the application of direct embryogenesis in sugarcane: effect of the developmental phase of leaf disc explants and the timing of DNA transfer on transformation efficiency , 2006, Plant Cell Reports.

[28]  I. Potrykus,et al.  Efficient Production of Transgenic Cassava Using Negative and Positive Selection , 2000, Transgenic Research.

[29]  Lian-Hui Zhang,et al.  Regeneration of sugarcane elite breeding lines and engineering of stem borer resistance. , 2006, Pest management science.

[30]  L. Privalle Phosphomannose Isomerase, a Novel Plant Selection System , 2002 .

[31]  Stefano Castiglione,et al.  Somaclonal variation in insect‐resistant transgenic sugarcane (Saccharum hybrid) plants produced by cell electroporation , 1999, Transgenic Research.

[32]  L. Privalle Phosphomannose isomerase, a novel plant selection system: potential allergenicity assessment. , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[33]  S. Rogers,et al.  Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues , 1985, Plant Molecular Biology.

[34]  M. Chan,et al.  An efficient protocol for sugarcane (Saccharum spp. L.) transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens , 1998, Transgenic Research.

[35]  Mark Stitt,et al.  Substrate specificity and product inhibition of different forms of fructokinases and hexokinases in developing potato tubers , 1993, Planta.

[36]  J. Irvine,et al.  Herbicide Resistant Transgenic Sugarcane Plants Containing the bar Gene , 1996 .

[37]  I. Vasil,et al.  Stably transformed herbicide resistant callus of sugarcane via microprojectile bombardment of cell suspension cultures and electroporation of protoplasts , 1992, Plant Cell Reports.

[38]  R. Birch,et al.  High-efficiency, microprojectile-mediated cotransformation of sugarcane, using visible or selectable markers , 2004, Molecular Breeding.

[39]  B. J. Mendes,et al.  The use of the PMI/mannose selection system to recover transgenic sweet orange plants (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) , 2003, Plant Cell Reports.

[40]  E. Ulian,et al.  Transformation and expression of a gene for herbicide resistance in a Brazilian sugarcane , 2000, Plant Cell Reports.

[41]  J. Irvine Saccharum species as horticultural classes , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[42]  A. Abouzid,et al.  Thidiazuron stimulates shoot regeneration of sugarcane embryogenic callus , 2000, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant.

[43]  A Sturm,et al.  Invertases. Primary structures, functions, and roles in plant development and sucrose partitioning. , 1999, Plant physiology.

[44]  D. Kim,et al.  Agrobacterium and biolistic transformation of onion using non-antibiotic selection marker phosphomannose isomerase , 2006, Plant Cell Reports.

[45]  J. Mikkelsen,et al.  Relationship between promoter strength and transformation frequencies using mannose selection for the production of transgenic sugar beet , 2000, Molecular Breeding.

[46]  Hongwei Liang,et al.  Mannose selection system used for cucumber transformation , 2006, Plant Cell Reports.

[47]  H. Wang,et al.  Efficient biolistic transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using the phosphomannose isomerase gene, pmi, as the selectable marker , 2001, Plant Cell Reports.

[48]  Dean W. Garbie Targeting of protein signals from Xanthomonas to the plant nucleus , 1997 .

[49]  F. Okkels,et al.  Parameters interacting with mannose selection employed for the production of transgenic sugar beet , 1999 .

[50]  C. Grof,et al.  Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugarcane using GFP as a screenable marker , 1998 .