Factors affecting the rate of false positive marks in CAD in full-field digital mammography.

OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of breast density, fibroglandular tissue volume, and breast volume on the rate of false-positive marks of a computer-assisted detection software in digital mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS 222 patients with normal digital mammograms and a minimum follow-up of 22 months were retrospectively identified. MLO and CC views were analyzed using a CAD software with three operating points ('specific', 'balanced', 'sensitive'). False-positive marks were recorded. Images were analyzed by a volumetric breast density assessment software, yielding estimates of percentage density, fibroglandular tissue volume, and breast volume. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, the t-test for independent samples and the Poisson regression model. RESULTS Patients with high fibroglandular tissue volumes had a higher mean number of false-positive mass marks than patients with low fibroglandular tissue volumes (specific setting: 0.50 vs. 0.35, respectively; balanced setting: 0.70 vs. 0.40, respectively, p<0.05; sensitive setting: 0.89 vs. 0.58, respectively, p<0.05). Relative risk for a false-positive mass marker increased by 1.43 (p<0.05), 1.63 (p<0.001) and 1.50 (p<0.01) per 100ml of fibroglandular tissue for the specific, balanced and sensitive settings, respectively. No significant effects of percentage density or breast volume on the number or the relative risk of false-positive mass marks were observed. CONCLUSION The volume of fibroglandular tissue present, but not the percentage density of the breast, affected the specificity for masses of the CAD software investigated. This may have implications for improving the performance of CAD systems, as the specificity of CAD may be improved by adjusting the algorithm threshold depending on the volume of fibroglandular tissue present. Considering both factors, fibroglandular tissue volume and percentage density, independently, could improve overall CAD performance in subgroups of patients, e.g. those with small, dense breasts or large breasts with low density.

[1]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  L. Fajardo,et al.  Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[4]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[5]  Joachim Böttcher,et al.  Effect of Breast Density on Computer Aided Detection , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[6]  Rachel F Brem,et al.  Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Carola Werner,et al.  Impact of Breast Density on Computer-Aided Detection in Full-Field Digital Mammography , 2006, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  W. T. Ho,et al.  Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. , 2003, Clinical Radiology.

[9]  Li Chen,et al.  Computerized analysis of tissue density effect on missed cancer detection in digital mammography , 2006, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[10]  Wendy Bruening,et al.  Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2009, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[11]  Wende Logan-Young,et al.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection systems in the detection of small invasive breast carcinoma. , 2007, Radiology.

[12]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[13]  Paul Taylor,et al.  Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[14]  Jeffrey W Hoffmeister,et al.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[17]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. , 2001, Radiology.