Basic leucine zipper transcription factor Hac1 binds DNA in two distinct modes as revealed by microfluidic analyses

A quantitative understanding of how transcription factors interact with genomic target sites is crucial for reconstructing transcriptional networks in vivo. Here, we use Hac1, a well-characterized basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor involved in the unfolded protein response (UPR) as a model to investigate interactions between bZIP transcription factors and their target sites. During the UPR, the accumulation of unfolded proteins leads to unconventional splicing and subsequent translation of HAC1 mRNA, followed by transcription of UPR target genes. Initial candidate-based approaches identified a canonical cis-acting unfolded protein response element (UPRE-1) within target gene promoters; however, subsequent studies identified a large set of Hac1 target genes lacking this UPRE-1 and containing a different motif (UPRE-2). Using a combination of unbiased and directed microfluidic DNA binding assays, we established that Hac1 binds in two distinct modes: (i) to short (6–7 bp) UPRE-2-like motifs and (ii) to significantly longer (11–13 bp) extended UPRE-1-like motifs. Using a genetic screen, we demonstrate that a region of extended homology N-terminal to the basic DNA binding domain is required for this dual site recognition. These results establish Hac1 as the first bZIP transcription factor known to adopt more than one binding mode and unify previously conflicting and discrepant observations of Hac1 function into a cohesive model of UPR target gene activation. Our results also suggest that even structurally simple transcription factors can recognize multiple divergent target sites of very different lengths, potentially enriching their downstream target repertoire.

[1]  J. Sambrook,et al.  A 22 bp cis‐acting element is necessary and sufficient for the induction of the yeast KAR2 (BiP) gene by unfolded proteins. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[2]  K. Struhl,et al.  The GCN4 basic region leucine zipper binds DNA as a dimer of uninterrupted α Helices: Crystal structure of the protein-DNA complex , 1992, Cell.

[3]  J. Sambrook,et al.  The promoter region of the yeast KAR2 (BiP) gene contains a regulatory domain that responds to the presence of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[4]  V. Berlin,et al.  The FKB2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encoding the immunosuppressant-binding protein FKBP-13, is regulated in response to accumulation of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Walter,et al.  The Unfolded- Protein-response Pathway in Yeast , 2022 .

[6]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of a bZIP/DNA complex at 2.2 A: determinants of DNA specific recognition. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  K. Mori,et al.  Signalling from endoplasmic reticulum to nucleus: transcription factor with a basic‐leucine zipper motif is required for the unfolded protein‐response pathway , 1996, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[8]  P. Walter,et al.  A Novel Mechanism for Regulating Activity of a Transcription Factor That Controls the Unfolded Protein Response , 1996, Cell.

[9]  K. Mori,et al.  Palindrome with Spacer of One Nucleotide Is Characteristic of thecis-Acting Unfolded Protein Response Element inSaccharomyces cerevisiae * , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  P. Walter,et al.  Intracellular signaling from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus. , 1998, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[11]  Toshio Hakoshima,et al.  Structural basis for the diversity of DNA recognition by bZIP transcription factors , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[12]  Peter Walter,et al.  Functional and Genomic Analyses Reveal an Essential Coordination between the Unfolded Protein Response and ER-Associated Degradation , 2000, Cell.

[13]  M. Schumacher,et al.  The Structure of a CREB bZIP·Somatostatin CRE Complex Reveals the Basis for Selective Dimerization and Divalent Cation-enhanced DNA Binding* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  P. Walter,et al.  Block of HAC1 mRNA Translation by Long-Range Base Pairing Is Released by Cytoplasmic Splicing upon Induction of the Unfolded Protein Response , 2001, Cell.

[15]  Maria Miller,et al.  Structural Basis for DNA Recognition by the Basic Region Leucine Zipper Transcription Factor CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein α* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  Peter Walter,et al.  Gcn4p and Novel Upstream Activating Sequences Regulate Targets of the Unfolded Protein Response , 2004, PLoS biology.

[17]  Barrett C. Foat,et al.  Profiling condition-specific, genome-wide regulation of mRNA stability in yeast. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  A. Fedorova,et al.  The GCN4 bZIP can bind to noncognate gene regulatory sequences. , 2006, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  A. Philippakis,et al.  Compact, universal DNA microarrays to comprehensively determine transcription-factor binding site specificities , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Alexandre V. Morozov,et al.  Statistical mechanical modeling of genome-wide transcription factor occupancy data by MatrixREDUCE , 2006, ISMB.

[21]  Hao Li,et al.  fREDUCE: Detection of degenerate regulatory elements using correlation with expression , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[22]  S. Quake,et al.  A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors , 2007, Science.

[23]  Christopher L. Warren,et al.  A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[24]  K. Yamamoto,et al.  DNA Binding Site Sequence Directs Glucocorticoid Receptor Structure and Activity , 2009, Science.

[25]  Daniel E. Newburger,et al.  High-resolution DNA-binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors. , 2009, Genome research.

[26]  Maria Miller The importance of being flexible: the case of basic region leucine zipper transcriptional regulators. , 2009, Current protein & peptide science.

[27]  Masayuki Yamamoto,et al.  Structural Basis of Alternative DNA Recognition by Maf Transcription Factors , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  Daniel E. Newburger,et al.  Diversity and Complexity in DNA Recognition by Transcription Factors , 2009, Science.

[29]  John C Chaput,et al.  Random mutagenesis by error-prone PCR. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[30]  S. Quake,et al.  De Novo Identification and Biophysical Characterization of Transcription Factor Binding Sites with Microfluidic Affinity Analysis , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  A. Saito,et al.  The signalling from endoplasmic reticulum-resident bZIP transcription factors involved in diverse cellular physiology. , 2011, Journal of biochemistry.

[32]  S. Luo,et al.  Direct measurement of DNA affinity landscapes on a high-throughput sequencing instrument , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  Raluca Gordân,et al.  Curated collection of yeast transcription factor DNA binding specificity data reveals novel structural and gene regulatory insights , 2011, Genome Biology.

[34]  Hana El-Samad,et al.  Cellular noise regulons underlie fluctuations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2012, Molecular cell.