Faculty productivity in supervising doctoral students' dissertations at Cornell University

Abstract Most research on faculty productivity focuses on the research ability of faculty members. This paper provides a new means of looking at faculty productivity by analyzing a second responsibility of faculty members: producing new Ph.D.'s. The authors first utilize a Lorenz curve analysis to establish that graduate student supervision is most equally distributed among faculty members in the physical sciences and least equally distributed among social science faculty. The second part of the paper uses a negative binomial regression model to investigate what faculty attributes affect how many graduate students a faculty member will supervise in a six-year period. The results suggest that, on average, a faculty member's prestige and her length of time at the institution are significant factors in predicting productivity.

[1]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[2]  Ronald G. Ehrenberg,et al.  The 1995 ratings of doctoral programs: A hedonic model , 1998 .

[3]  Lowell L. Hargens,et al.  Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates. , 1988 .

[4]  R. Winkelmann Econometric Analysis of Count Data , 1997 .

[5]  John T. Warren,et al.  Negative Returns to Seniority: New Evidence in Academic Markets , 2003 .

[6]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[7]  Seongsu Kim The Impact of Research Productivity on Early Retirement of University Professors , 2003 .

[8]  S. Rock,et al.  Analyst following and count-data econometrics , 2000 .

[9]  H. Zuckerman,et al.  The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community , 1991 .

[10]  The 1995 Nrc Ratings of Doctoral Programs: A Hedonic Model , 1996 .

[11]  M. F. Fox Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review , 1983 .

[12]  D. Ginther,et al.  Gender Differences in Salary and Promotion for Faculty in the Humanities 1977–95 , 2003, The Journal of Human Resources.

[13]  D. Hamermesh,et al.  Scholarships, Citations and Salaries: Economic Rewards in Economics , 1982 .

[14]  Daniel S. Hamermesh,et al.  Why Do Individual-Effects Models Perform so Poorly? The Case of Academic Salaries , 1989 .

[15]  B. Maher,et al.  Research-doctorate programs in the United States: continuity and change , 1996 .

[16]  Ronald G. Ehrenberg,et al.  Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy. , 1984 .

[17]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[18]  D. Thilmany Gender Based Differences of Performance and Pay Among Agricultural Economics Faculty , 2000 .

[19]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[20]  W. J. Moore,et al.  Do Academic Salaries Decline with Seniority? , 1998, Journal of Labor Economics.

[21]  S. P. Smith,et al.  Faculty retirement in the arts and sciences , 1994 .

[22]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time, , 1994 .