Erratum: Computational Exploration of the Biological Basis of Black-Scholes Expected Utility Function

It has often been argued that there exists an underlying biological basis of utility functions. Taking this line of argument a step further in this paper, we have aimed to computationally demonstrate the biological basis of the Black-Scholes functional form as applied to classical option pricing and hedging theory. The evolutionary optimality of the classical Black-Scholes function has been computationally established by means of a haploid genetic algorithm model. The objective was to minimize the dynamic hedging error for a portfolio of assets that is built to replicate the payoff from a European multi-asset option. The functional form that is seen to evolve over successive generations which best attains this optimization objective is the classical Black-Scholes function extended to a multiasset scenario.

[1]  Fischer Black,et al.  Simplifying portfolio insurance , 1987 .

[2]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  Monographs on statistics and applied probability , 1990 .

[3]  Gary S. Becker,et al.  Altruism, Egoism, and Genetic Fitness: Economics and Sociobiology , 1976 .

[4]  J. Chen The Physical Foundation of Economics: An Analytical Thermodynamic Theory , 2005 .

[5]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Options on the minimum or the maximum of two risky assets : Analysis and applications , 1982 .

[6]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning , 1989 .

[7]  Carlo Milana Functional form and utility. A Review of Consumer Demand Theory, Arthur S. Goldberger. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1987, ISBN 0‐8133‐7489‐8, paper $24.95, pp. xii + 121 , 1991 .

[8]  Arthur J. Robson,et al.  Why Would Nature Give Individuals Utility Functions? , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[10]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  Anne S. Hawkins Bandit Problems—Sequential Allocation of Experiments , 1987 .

[12]  Jot Yau,et al.  Added Value in Financial Institutions , 2001 .

[13]  Arthur J. Robson,et al.  A Biological Basis for Expected and Non-expected Utility , 1996 .

[14]  H. Johnson Options on the Maximum or the Minimum of Several Assets , 1987, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[15]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Computational Exploration of the Biological Basis of Black-Scholes Expected Utility Function , 2007, Adv. Decis. Sci..