Surface-based registration accuracy of CT-based image-guided spine surgery

Registration is a critical and important process in maintaining the accuracy of CT-based image-guided surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the area of intraoperative data sampling and number of sampling points on the accuracy of surface-based registration in a CT-based spinal-navigation system, using an optical three-dimensional localizer. A cadaveric dry-bone phantom of the lumbar spine was used. To evaluate registration accuracy, three alumina ceramic balls were attached to the anterior and lateral aspects of the vertebral body. CT images of the phantom were obtained (1-mm slice thickness, at1-mm intervals) using a helical CT scanner. Twenty surface points were digitized from five zones defined on the basis of anatomical classification on the posterior aspects of the target vertebra. A total of 20 sets of sampling data were obtained. Evaluation of registration accuracy accounted for positional and rotational errors. Of the five zones, the area that was the largest and easiest to expose surgically and to digitize surface points was the lamina. The lamina was defined as standard zone. On this zone, the effect of the number of sampling points on the positional and rotational accuracy of registration was evaluated. And the effects of the additional area selected for intraoperative data sampling on the registration accuracy were evaluated. Using 20 surface points on the posterior side of the lamina, positional error was 0.96 mm±0.24 mm root-mean-square (RMS) and rotational error was 0.91°±0.38°RMS. The use of 20 surface points on the lamina usually allows surgeons to carry out sufficiently accurate registration to conduct computer-aided spine surgery. In the case of severe spondylosis, however, it might be difficult to digitize the surface points from the lamina, due to a hypertrophic facet joint or the deformity of the lamina and noisy sampling data. In such cases, registration accuracy can be improved by combining use of the 20 surface points on the lamina with surface points on other zones, such as on the both sides of the spinous process.

[1]  T. Lund,et al.  A new approach to computer-aided spine surgery: fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[2]  P. Cinquin,et al.  Computer-assisted spine surgery: a technique for accurate transpedicular screw fixation using CT data and a 3-D optical localizer. , 1995, Journal of image guided surgery.

[3]  H Labelle,et al.  Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. , 2000, Spine.

[4]  Frank Langlotz,et al.  Image‐Guided Insertion of Transpedicular Screws: A Laboratory Set‐Up , 1995, Spine.

[5]  D.M. Muratore,et al.  Surface-based registration of CT images to physical space for image-guided surgery of the spine: a sensitivity study , 2002, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[6]  L. Nolte,et al.  Improved Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion With Computer-Assisted Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Trial of 30 Patients , 1997, Spine.

[7]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[8]  A Hamadeh,et al.  Computer Assisted Spine Surgery , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  T. Laine,et al.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[10]  G H Barnett,et al.  Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  P. Cinquin,et al.  Computer-assisted spine surgery. , 1998, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[13]  F. Langlotz,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a system for precision enhancement in spine surgery. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  Maurice M. Smith,et al.  Image-guided spine surgery. , 1996, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[15]  D P McGowan,et al.  Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. , 1990, Spine.

[16]  F. Cammisa,et al.  The placement of lumbar pedicle screws using computerised stereotactic guidance. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  L Zamorano,et al.  Image-guided computer-assisted spine surgery: a pilot study on pedicle screw fixation. , 1996, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[18]  F. Langlotz,et al.  Computer-aided fixation of spinal implants. , 1995, Journal of image guided surgery.

[19]  K. Vosburgh,et al.  In Vitro Simulation: Early Results of Stereotaxy for Pedicle Screw Placement , 1997, Spine.

[20]  H Labelle,et al.  Computer‐Assisted Pedicle Screw Fixation‐ A Feasibility Study , 1995, Spine.

[21]  D. Simon,et al.  Virtual Fluoroscopy: Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopic Navigation , 2001, Spine.

[22]  P Merloz,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement Using Image Guided Techniques , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.