Toward Controllable Hydraulic Coupling of Joints in a Wearable Robot

In this paper, we develop theoretical foundations for a new class of rehabilitation robot: body-powered devices that route power between a user's joints. By harvesting power from a healthy joint to assist an impaired joint, novel bimanual and self-assist therapies are enabled. This approach complements existing robotic therapies aimed at promoting recovery of motor function after neurological injury. We employ hydraulic transmissions for routing power, or equivalently for coupling the motions of a user's joints. Fluid power routed through flexible tubing imposes constraints within a limb or between homologous joints across the body. Variable transmissions allow constraints to be steered on the fly, and simple valve switching realizes free space and locked motion. We examine two methods for realizing variable hydraulic transmissions: using valves to switch among redundant cylinders (digital hydraulics) or using an intervening electromechanical link. For both methods, we present a rigorous mathematical framework for describing and controlling the resulting constraints. Theoretical developments are supported by experiments using a prototype fluid-power exoskeleton.

[1]  J. Dewald,et al.  Task-dependent weakness at the elbow in patients with hemiparesis. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  An Assistive Cobot for Aid in Self Care Activities , 2002 .

[3]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation--a clinical review. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  A general framework for cobot control , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  B. Wünsche,et al.  Assessment of movement quality in robot- assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Analysis of Control Architectures for Teleoperation Systems with Impedance/Admittance Master and Slave Manipulators , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  R. C. Coulter,et al.  Implementation of the Pure Pursuit Path Tracking Algorithm , 1992 .

[9]  S. Hesse,et al.  Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control , 2003, Current opinion in neurology.

[10]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Cobot architecture , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[11]  Matti Linjama,et al.  Digital Fluid Power – State of the Art , 2011 .

[12]  John P. Whitney,et al.  A low-friction passive fluid transmission and fluid-tendon soft actuator , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Michael Goldfarb Dimensional analysis and selective distortion in scaled bilateral telemanipulation , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[14]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  N. Hogan,et al.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[16]  C. Winstein,et al.  Bimanual Training After Stroke: Are Two Hands Better Than One? , 2004, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[17]  E. Berton,et al.  Bimanual training in stroke: How do coupling and symmetry-breaking matter? , 2011, BMC neurology.

[18]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  A novel variable transmission with digital hydraulics , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[19]  Xiaobo Li,et al.  Design and Control of a 3-D Wearable Cobot , 2005 .

[20]  Paul Bosscher,et al.  Haptic Cobot Exoskeleton: Concepts and Mechanism Design , 2006 .

[21]  Antony J. Hodgson,et al.  Control of minimally constrained cobots , 2002, J. Field Robotics.

[22]  Peng Pan,et al.  Human interaction with passive assistive robots , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[23]  Matti Linjama,et al.  DIGITAL HYDRAULIC POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – TOWARDS LOSSLESS HYDRAULICS , 2012 .

[24]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Robust impedance shaping telemanipulation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[25]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  The Cobotic Hand Controller: Design, Control and Performance of a Novel Haptic Display , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[26]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Spinal Cord Injury Swing Phase Resistance Enhances Flexor Muscle Activity During Treadmill Locomotion in Incomplete , 2008 .

[27]  P.A.J. Achten,et al.  Transforming future hydraulics : a new design of a hydraulic transformer , 1997 .

[28]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Kinematic Creep in a Continuously Variable Transmission: Traction Drive Mechanics for Cobots , 2002 .