The Asymmetrical Influence of Sex Dissimilarity in Distributive vs. Colocated Work Groups

Data from 101 Australian research scientists were used to examine the relationship between sex dissimilarity and work group identification, and task and emotional conflict. Based on social identity and self-categorization theories, these relationships were argued to vary between men and women, and between colocated and distributive work groups. Women reported lower levels of work group identification and higher levels of task and emotional conflict in conjunction with higher levels of sex dissimilarity. Men reported lower levels of task conflict in conjunction with higher levels of sex dissimilarity. No parallel effects on identification or emotional conflict were observed. Sex dissimilarity was found to have a stronger influence on work group identification, and task and emotional conflict in colocated work groups than in distributive work groups.

[1]  L. Wirth,et al.  Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling: Women in Management , 2003 .

[2]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[3]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[4]  Elizabeth George,et al.  Why Does Dissimilarity Matter? Exploring Self-Categorization, Self-Enhancement, and Uncertainty Reduction , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[6]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization , 1986 .

[7]  Elizabeth George,et al.  Identifying the Ingroup: A Closer Look at the Influence of Demographic Dissimilarity on Employee Social Identity , 2004 .

[8]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[9]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes , 1998 .

[10]  A. Konrad,et al.  Diversity attitudes and norms: the role of ethnic identity and relational demography , 2006 .

[11]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .

[12]  A. Hollingshead.  Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems , 1998 .

[13]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory , 1999 .

[14]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[15]  Elizabeth V. Hobman,et al.  Virtual Teams and Group Member Dissimilarity , 2006 .

[16]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[17]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  The effects of demographic diversity and virtual work environments on knowledge processing in teams , 2001 .

[18]  James N. Baron,et al.  So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men at work. , 1987 .

[19]  Steven L. Blader,et al.  Assuming preferential selection when the admissions policy is unknown: the effects of gender rarity. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  Task interdependence and extrarole behavior : a test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility , 1991 .

[21]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[22]  B. Kabanoff.  Equity, Equality, Power, and Conflict , 1991 .

[23]  M. Withey,et al.  Predicting Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect. , 1989 .

[24]  M. Heilman.  Affirmative action: Some unintended consequences for working women , 1994 .

[25]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[26]  K. Jehn.  ENHANCING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VALUE‐BASED INTRAGROUP CONFLICT , 1994 .

[27]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[30]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Media Effects and Communication Bias in Diverse Groups , 1997 .

[31]  Elizabeth C. Ravlin,et al.  Status and Stratification Processes in Organizational Life , 2005 .

[32]  C. M. Riordan,et al.  Demographic diversity and employee attitudes : An empirical examination of relational demography within work units , 1997 .

[33]  S. Raghuram,et al.  Communication Patterns As Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization , 1999 .

[34]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[35]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[36]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[37]  Marc-David L. Seidel,et al.  Motivation and Opportunity: The Role of Remote Work, Demographic Dissimilarity, and Social Network Centrality in Impression Management , 2005 .

[38]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[39]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[40]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations , 1991 .

[41]  Prithviraj Chattopadhyay,et al.  Beyond Direct and Symmetrical Effects: The Influence of Demographic Dissimilarity on Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 1999 .

[42]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A Typology of Virtual Teams , 2002 .

[43]  Vipin Gupta,et al.  Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment , 2001 .

[44]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[45]  Elizabeth George,et al.  2 Old Assumptions, New Work: The Opportunities and Challenges of Research on Nonstandard Employment , 2007 .

[46]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[47]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[48]  D. Terry,et al.  In-group bias in response to an organizational merger , 1998 .

[49]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[50]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Managing a virtual workplace , 2000 .

[51]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[52]  J. Hackman.  A Normative Model of Work Team Effectiveness , 1983 .

[53]  M. Heilman,et al.  What I think you think of me: women's reactions to being viewed as beneficiaries of preferential selection. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[55]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Intergroup relations and group solidarity : Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction , 1996 .

[57]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration , 1992 .

[58]  E. Hobman,et al.  Perceived Dissimilarity and Work Group Involvement , 2004 .

[59]  S. Jackson,et al.  Cross-level effects of workplace diversity on sales performance and pay , 2006 .

[60]  George B. Graen,et al.  Effects of Team Gender and Racial Composition on Perceptions of Team Performance in Cross-Functional Teams , 1997 .

[61]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1983 .