Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy versus open surgery for non-tuberculous pyonephrotic nonfunctioning kidney: a single-center experience

Background Patients with obstructive pyonephrotic nonfunctioning kidney (OPNK) often require simple nephrectomy for long-term severe clinical symptoms. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of retroperitoneal laparoscopy versus open surgery for OPNK. Methods The study included clinical data of 69 patients with non-tuberculous OPNK from January 2015 to June 2019 in a single center. The patients were divided into laparoscopic group (LS, N=33) and open surgery group (OS, N=36). Those whose pathological findings were xanthogranulomatous inflammation or tuberculous granuloma were excluded. Statistical analysis compared the two groups in terms of basic demographic characteristics, preoperative laboratory examination results, and intraoperative and postoperative observation indicators. Results The results showed that non-tuberculous OPNK were more common in women (female/male =4:1). Compared with the LS group, patients in the OS group had higher white blood cells (WBC; P=0.010) and neutrophils (P=0.005) counts before surgery. The main clinical symptoms were low back pain, pyuria, and fever; among them, low back pain combined with pyuria was in the majority. More intraoperative hypotension events were observed in the OS group (P=0.007). Notably, subgroup analysis showed larger stone size happened in the OS group (OR 3.538, 95% CI, 1.337, 9.208). No statistical difference was found in the duration of surgery between the two groups while the length of postoperative hospitalization and retroperitoneal drainage, and postoperative blood transfusion rate increased significantly in the OS group. Postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was more common in the LS group, while opioid analgesics were in the OS group (P=0.0006). There was no statistical difference in other complications. Conclusions In conclusion, considering the advantages of LS in terms of postoperative blood transfusion, surgical drainage and length of hospital stay, we recommend it for non-tubercular OPNK when the stone load of pyonephrosis side was less than 280 mm2 and the preoperative WBC and neutrophil count were within the normal range.

[1]  V. Ulker,et al.  Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Nephrectomy in Non-functioning Severe Hydronephrotic Kidneys With or Without Renal Stone , 2018, Cureus.

[2]  Haofeng Zheng,et al.  Comparison of Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for Nonfunctional Tuberculous Kidneys: A Single-Center Experience. , 2017, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[3]  Öner Şanlı,et al.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal simple nephrectomy: The impact of etiological factors of the results of surgical treatment. , 2017, Turkish journal of urology.

[4]  Cheng Wang,et al.  Open surgery versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal tuberculosis: a retrospective study of 120 patients , 2016, PeerJ.

[5]  Ibrahim Buldu,et al.  Does laparoscopic transperitoneal simple nephrectomy for inflammatory and non-inflammatory kidneys differ? , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[6]  R. Napier-Hemy,et al.  Nephrectomy for benign disease in the UK: results from the British Association of Urological Surgeons nephrectomy database , 2016, BJU international.

[7]  A. Rosales,et al.  Simple Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in Stone Disease: Not Always Simple. , 2016, Journal of endourology.

[8]  I. Geçit,et al.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy in non-functioning inflammatory kidneys with or without renal stone. , 2015, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[9]  R. Sinha,et al.  Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy. , 2014, Urology.

[10]  Q. Ding,et al.  Urolithiasis: the most risk for nephrectomy in nonrenal tumor patients. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[11]  C. D'ancona,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy for xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis – Are there predictive factors for success? , 2012, Clinics.

[12]  A. Müslümanoğlu,et al.  Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for non-functioning kidneys related to renal stone disease , 2012, Urological Research.

[13]  A. Hemal,et al.  Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for pyonephrotic nonfunctioning kidney. , 2010, Urology.

[14]  Sadao Suzuki,et al.  Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of urolithiasis in Japan: national trends between 1965 and 2005. , 2008, Urology.

[15]  M. Desai,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign and inflammatory conditions. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[16]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Laparoscopic retroperitoneal nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis: when simple nephrectomy isn't simple. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[17]  J. Kaouk,et al.  A prospective comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in the extremely obese patient , 2007, BJU international.

[18]  O. Gofrit,et al.  Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for Infected, Obstructed and Non-functioning Kidneys , 2004, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[19]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Proposal for a ‘European Scoring System for Laparoscopic Operations in Urology’ , 2001, European Urology.

[20]  A. Hemal,et al.  Complications of retroperitoneoscopic surgery at one centre , 2001, BJU international.

[21]  A. Hemal,et al.  Comparison of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy with open surgery for tuberculous nonfunctioning kidneys. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[22]  Hyeon-Hoe Kim,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy for nonfunctioning tuberculous kidney. , 2000, Journal of endourology.

[23]  E. Klein,et al.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland clinic experience. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[24]  B. Markarian,et al.  Nonfunctioning kidney. , 1972, New York state journal of medicine.