Promoting Knowledge Creation Discourse in an Asian Primary Five Classroom: Results from an inquiry into life cycles

The phrase ‘knowledge creation’ refers to the practices by which a community advances its collective knowledge. Experience with a model of knowledge creation could help students to learn about the nature of science. This research examined how much progress a teacher and 16 Primary Five (Grade 4) students in the International Baccalaureate Primary Years Programme could make towards the discourse needed for Bereiter and Scardamalia’s model of knowledge creation. The study consisted of two phases: a five‐month period focusing on the development of the classroom ethos and skills needed for this model (Phase 1), followed by a two‐month inquiry into life cycles (Phase 2). In Phase 1, we examined the classroom practices that are thought to support knowledge creation and the early experiences of the students with a web‐based inquiry environment, Knowledge Forum®. In Phase 2, we conducted a summative evaluation of the students’ work in Knowledge Forum in the light of the model. The data sources included classroom video recordings, artefacts of the in‐class work, the Knowledge Forum database, a science content test, questionnaires, and interviews. The findings indicate that the students made substantial progress towards the knowledge creation discourse, particularly regarding the social structure of this kind of discourse and, to a lesser extent, its idea‐centred nature. They also made acceptable advances in scientific knowledge and appeared to enjoy this way of learning. The study provides one of the first accounts in the literature of how a teacher new to the knowledge creation model enacted it in an Asian primary classroom.

[1]  van Aalst,et al.  Learning, knowledge building, and subject matter knowledge in school science , 1999 .

[2]  L. Lipponen.  Towards Knowledge Building: From Facts to Explanations in Primary Students' Computer Mediated Discourse , 2000 .

[3]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Epistemology of Inquiry and Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2013 .

[4]  Christine Chin.  Classroom Interaction in Science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses , 2006 .

[5]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[6]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[7]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[8]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .

[9]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[10]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[11]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning , 2004 .

[12]  J. Lemke.  Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[13]  Y. Engeström.  Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[14]  J. V. Aalst,et al.  Implementing Knowledge Building: Analysis of a Face-to-Face Discussion by Grade-Four Students , 2006 .

[15]  Leslie Smith.  Education for thinking , 2006 .

[16]  Rob Kling,et al.  Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning: Introduction , 2004 .

[17]  Jan van Aalst,et al.  Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[18]  Igal Galili,et al.  Learners' knowledge in optics: interpretation, structure and analysis , 2000 .

[19]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Intentional Learning as a Goal of Instruction , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[20]  Karen Gallas,et al.  Talking their way into science : hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula , 1995 .

[21]  S. Erduran,et al.  TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .

[22]  Derek Hodson,et al.  From the Horse's Mouth: What Scientists Say About Scientific Investigation and Scientific Knowledge , 2009 .

[23]  M. Linn,et al.  Teaching science through online, peer discussions: SpeakEasy in the Knowledge Integration Environment , 2000 .

[24]  Dana L. Zeidler,et al.  Promoting Discourse about Socioscientific Issues through Scaffolded Inquiry , 2007 .

[25]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building Environments: Extending the Limits of the Possible in Education and Knowledge Work , 2003 .

[26]  Pamela Van Scotter,et al.  The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications , 2006 .

[27]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise , 1993 .

[28]  C. Haythornthwaite.  Building Virtual Communities: Building Social Networks Via Computer Networks: Creating and Sustaining Distributed Learning Communities , 2002 .

[29]  K. Dunbar.  HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES , 1995 .

[30]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds , 2007 .

[31]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[32]  K. Hakkarainen.  Emergence of Progressive-Inquiry Culture in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2003 .

[33]  K. Popper.  Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .

[34]  G. Stahl.  Rediscovering CSCL , 2001 .

[35]  Peg A Ertmer,et al.  PBL Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design Into Practice , 2012 .

[36]  R. Swinburne.  OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE: AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH , 1973 .

[37]  Leema K. Berland,et al.  Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .

[38]  Review of "Action, Talk and Text - Learning and Teaching Through Inquiry" , 2002 .

[39]  M. Scardamalia.  Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge , 2002 .

[40]  Philip Bell.  Promoting Students' Argument Construction and Collaborative Debate in the Science Classroom , 2013 .

[41]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[42]  Paul Kirchner,et al.  Arguing to learn , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[43]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[44]  Vic Lally,et al.  Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for Social Network Analysis , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[45]  Carol K. K. Chan.  Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information , 2001 .

[46]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Collaborative learning processes associated with high and low conceptual progress , 1996 .

[47]  Jim Hewitt.  How Habitual Online Practices Affect the Development of Asynchronous Discussion Threads , 2003 .

[48]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[49]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Using Questioning to Guide Student Thinking , 1997 .