Informing the knowledge workers

Being part of a “learning community” requires that knowledge workers keep themselves informed of developments in their area of expertise. However, as we all know, an information saturation problem exists, not least because of the Internet. Modes of informing are specific to each person’s concerns, as are the topics they want to be informed about. Libraries and information centers have sought to accommodate this need in the past by promoting Current Awareness Services (CAS) and Selective Dissemination of Information (SDI), either through print or electronic means. With the migration of these systems to the Internet, intranet, or corporate portal, it has become the vogue to customize or personalize these access points in accordance with user interests. On the horizon is the promise of intelligent software agents as an additional aid for filtering and retrieving information. This article will argue that librarians need to continue embracing the model principle of CAS, as a tool of relevance, and as a function for remaining visible to their client communities.

[1]  Dee Andy Michel,et al.  Library research models: A guide to classification, cataloging and computers: Mann, Thomas. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 248 pp. $22.50 (ISBN: 0-19-5-8190-0). , 1994 .

[2]  Tripp Reade,et al.  Pioneering Portals: MyLibrary@NCState , 2000 .

[3]  Michael E. D. Koenig,et al.  Knowledge Management for the Information Professional , 2000 .

[4]  J. E. Rowley.  Current awareness or competitive intelligence : a review of the options , 1992 .

[5]  Traugott Koch,et al.  Quality-controlled subject gateways: definitions, typologies, empirical overview , 2000, Online Inf. Rev..

[6]  Richard Keeble,et al.  Assistant agents for the world wide web intelligent interface design challenges , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[7]  Noel P. Greis,et al.  Knowledge management across multi-tier enterprises: the promise of intelligent software in the auto industry , 1999 .

[8]  Chris Gray,et al.  Personalized Library Portals as an Organizational Culture Change Agent , 2000 .

[9]  Susan Feldman,et al.  Intelligent Agents: A Primer. , 1999 .

[10]  Hyacinth S. Nwana,et al.  2 Multi-Agent Systems : Promises and Reality , 1999 .

[11]  James P. Callan,et al.  Document filtering with inference networks , 1996, SIGIR '96.

[12]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Information and information systems , 1991 .

[13]  Dagobert Soergel,et al.  The importance of SDI for current awareness in fields with severe scatter of information , 1979, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Matthias Klusch,et al.  Information agent technology for the Internet: A survey , 2001, Data Knowl. Eng..

[15]  Moses Ma.  Agents in E-commerce , 1999, CACM.

[16]  Ina Fourie.  Empowering users - current awareness on the Internet , 1999, Electron. Libr..

[17]  T. Whitehall.  Practical current awareness services from libraries , 1986 .

[18]  Harry B. Back.  What information dissemination studies imply concerning the design of on-line reference retrieval systems , 1972, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Judy E. Scott.  Organizational knowledge and the Intranet , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Renato Iannella,et al.  Architecture and software solutions , 2000, Online Inf. Rev..

[21]  Michael D. Gordon,et al.  Finding Information on the World Wide Web: The Retrieval Effectiveness of Search Engines , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[22]  Maryellen Mott Allen,et al.  The myth of intelligent agents , 2000 .

[23]  Elmer D. Johnson.  history of libraries in the Western World , 1965 .

[24]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[25]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation , 2000 .

[26]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Software agents , 1997 .

[27]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  A review of the status of 20 digital libraries , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[28]  M. Dahn.  Counting angels on a pinhead : Critically interpreting web size estimates , 2000 .

[29]  Holly Mistlebauer,et al.  MyLibrary: Personalized Electronic Services in the Cornell University Library , 2000, D Lib Mag..

[30]  Eugénio C. Oliveira,et al.  Multi-agent systems: which research for which applications , 1999, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[31]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  What are Digital Libraries? Competing Visions , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[32]  Julie Mason,et al.  INFOMINE: Promising Directions in Virtual Library Development , 2000, First Monday.

[33]  Debra S. Ketchell,et al.  Too Many Channels: Making Sense out of Portals and Personalization , 2000 .

[34]  Bob Travica,et al.  Organizational aspects of the virtual library: A survey of academic libraries , 1999 .

[35]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  WebMate: a personal agent for browsing and searching , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[36]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  An architecture for developing attentive information systems , 2001, Knowl. Based Syst..

[37]  Laura Zick.  The Work of Information Mediators: A Comparison of Librarians and Intelligent Software Agents , 2000, First Monday.

[38]  Lawrence G. Mondschein,et al.  Documentation note: Selective Dissemination of Information (SDI): Relationship to Productivity in the Corporate R&d Environment , 1990, J. Documentation.

[39]  Patricia Charlton,et al.  The open agent society and its enemies: a position statement and research programme , 2001, Telematics Informatics.

[40]  M. Castro,et al.  Studies on the prolactin-releasing mechanism of histones H2A and H2B. , 2000, Life sciences.

[41]  Philip Powell,et al.  Information: a perceiver-concerns perspective , 1995 .

[42]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[43]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  Autonomous interface agents , 1997, CHI.

[44]  H. P. Luhn.  Selective dissemination of new scientific information with the aid of electronic processing equipment , 1961 .

[45]  Vicki L. O'Day,et al.  Intelligent Agents: What We Learned at the Library , 1996 .

[46]  Elizabeth D. Liddy,et al.  Evolving intelligent text-based agents , 2000, AGENTS '00.

[47]  Rob Kling,et al.  Learning About Information Technologies and Social Change: The Contribution of Social Informatics , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[48]  Amy Brand.  CrossRef Turns One , 2001, D Lib Mag..

[49]  Martin White,et al.  Enterprise information portals , 2000, Electron. Libr..

[50]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Linking to Full Text in Scholarly Journals: Here a Link, There a Link, Everywhere a Link , 2000 .

[51]  Yin Zhang.  Scholarly use of internet-based electronic resources , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[52]  Stanley B. Zdonik,et al.  “Data in your face”: push technology in perspective , 1998, SIGMOD '98.

[53]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  User-Centered Push for Timely Information Delivery , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[54]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Cooperative Multiagent Systems: A Personal View of the State of the Art , 1999, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[55]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Digital libraries , 1995, CACM.

[56]  David Alasdair Kemp.  Current Awareness Services , 1979 .

[57]  Jane Padham Ouderkirk.  Technical services task assignment: from macros to collection management intelligent agents , 1999 .

[58]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  On agent-based software engineering , 2000, Artif. Intell..