Two‐dimensional modelling of habitat suitability as a function of discharge on two Colorado rivers

The quantity of water that should be retained in streams and rivers for the benefit of fish during periods of water scarcity is a question of considerable interest to river managers and biologists. Although instream flow methodologies have existed since the 1970s, no single method has been widely accepted for use on large warm-water rivers because of their high species richness and generalized fish habitat use patterns. In this paper, we present an approach similar to instream flow incremental methodology, but which uses two-dimensional flow models and biomass estimates derived from multiple sites on two Colorado rivers for predicting the effect of discharge on adult standing stocks of two native fish species. Suitability criteria are developed for bluehead and flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus discobolus and C. latipinnis) by comparing adult biomass in individual meso-habitat units with modelled depths and velocities. We find that roundtail chub (Gila robusta) biomass is not correlated with depth and velocity, but appears to be positively associated with indices of habitat heterogeneity. Species biomass and total usable habitat area are predicted as a function of discharge for each site and data show good correlation between predicted and measured biomass. Results suggest that the Colorado and Yampa Rivers have similar potential for native fish biomass, but low summer discharges limit native fish biomass on the Yampa River. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 1950 .

[2]  S. R. McLean,et al.  Predicting Boundary Shear Stress and Sediment Transport over Bed Forms , 1999 .

[3]  B. L. Lamb,et al.  Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology , 1998 .

[4]  M. Bain,et al.  Regulated streamflow and warmwater stream fish: a general hypothesis and research agenda , 1989 .

[5]  T. Wesche,et al.  Status of Instream Flow Legislation and Practices in North America , 1989 .

[6]  Piotr Parasiewicz,et al.  MesoHABSIM: A concept for application of instream flow models in river restoration planning , 2001 .

[7]  K. Iguchi,et al.  Colonization of an artificial stream by fishes and aquatic macro-invertebrates , 1998, Ecological research.

[8]  M. Leclerc,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling: A Neglected Tool in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology , 1995 .

[9]  C. M. Cooper,et al.  Effects of channel incision on base flow stream habitats and fishes , 1994 .

[10]  M. Freeman,et al.  Evaluation of generalized habitat criteria for assessing impacts of altered flow regimes on warmwater fishes , 1998 .

[11]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[12]  Robert T. Lackey,et al.  Principles of Fishery Science , 1975 .

[13]  I. Schlosser,et al.  FISH COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION ALONG TWO HABITAT GRADIENTS IN A HEADWATER STREAM , 1982 .

[14]  R. Eckmann.  Fish species richness in lakes of the northeastern lowlands in Germany , 1995 .

[15]  D. M. Thompson,et al.  Interactions between pool geometry and hydraulics , 1998 .

[16]  R. L. Shreve,et al.  Role of Near‐Bed Turbulence Structure in Bed Load Transport and Bed Form Mechanics , 1995 .

[17]  D. Topping,et al.  Colorado River sediment transport: 2. Systematic Bed‐elevation and grain‐size effects of sand supply limitation , 2000 .

[18]  M. Power.  Habitat Heterogeneity and The Functional Signifiance of Fish in River Food Webs , 1992 .

[19]  C. S. Shirvell,et al.  A Critique of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology and Observations on Flow Determination in New Zealand , 1987 .

[20]  Dilip Mathur,et al.  A critique of the instream flow incremental methodology , 1985 .

[21]  J. Connell.  Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past , 1980 .

[22]  Richard A Anderson,et al.  Riverine Fish Flow Investigations Federal Aid Project F-289-R6 , 2004 .

[23]  Panayiotis Diplas,et al.  Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance , 2000 .

[24]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Development and validation of numerical habitat models for juveniles of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) , 2000 .

[25]  G. Mathias Kondolf,et al.  Some Suggested Guidelines for Geomorphic Aspects of Anadromous Salmonid Habitat Restoration Proposals , 2000 .

[26]  B. L. Lamb,et al.  The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology: A Primer for IFIM. , 1995 .

[27]  Donald J. Orth,et al.  Habitat Use by an Assemblage of Fish in a Large Warmwater Stream , 1991 .

[28]  Predictive techniques for river channel evolution and maintenance , 1996 .

[29]  Peter M. Steffler,et al.  TWO‐DIMENSIONAL HYDRAULIC SIMULATION OF PHYSICAL HABITAT CONDITIONS IN FLOWING STREAMS , 1996 .

[30]  Thomas B. Hardy,et al.  The future of habitat modeling and instream flow assessment techniques , 1998 .