Invertebrate paraxial locomotory appendages: design, deformation and control.

Some principles governing the design of invertebrate paired propulsive appendages are discussed, with particular reference to the extent to which information encoded in their skeletal structure determines their instantaneous shape in locomotion. The hydrostatic paired fins of some cephalopods and marine gastropods, polychaete parapodia and onychophoran lobopodia rely entirely on musculature for shape control. The deformations of walking limbs, though still under muscular control, are strongly influenced by the nature and sequence of movement of the joints. Limbs adapted for walking in air are effectively point-loaded, and their rigid components need to resist axial forces as well as bending and torsional moments. Aquatic walking limbs have little axial loading, while swimming appendages and wings experience only bending and torsional moments, and can exploit these to assist in the deformations that are necessary to gain force asymmetry between half-strokes. Swimming appendages normally employ both muscles and drag, but the wings of insects lack internal muscles, and their changes in shape are largely complex aeroelastic responses to the constantly changing aerodynamic and inertial loads, moderated by muscles inserted at the base. For illustration, wings modelled as thin shells with flexible hinge-lines are used to investigate how transverse distal flexion, essential for controlling the angle of attack in the upstroke, is remotely controlled by the indirect flight muscles.

[1]  H. G. Cannon On the Feeding Mechanism of the Branchiopoda , 1932 .

[2]  J. Gray Studies in Animal Locomotion: VIII. The Kinetics of Locomotion of Nereis diversicolor , 1939 .

[3]  M. Jensen Biology and physics of locust flight. III. The aerodynamics of locust flight , 1956, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[4]  R. B. Clark THE ORIGIN AND FORMATION OF THE HETERONERIS , 1961, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[5]  J. Currey,et al.  The failure of exoskeletons and endoskeletons , 1967, Journal of morphology.

[6]  H. Bennet-Clark,et al.  The jump of the flea: a study of the energetics and a model of the mechanism. , 1967, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  E. Morgan The Swimming of Nymphon Gracile (Pyconogonida) : The Mechanics of the Leg-Beat Cycle , 1971 .

[8]  A. Packard,et al.  CEPHALOPODS AND FISH: THE LIMITS OF CONVERGENCE , 1972 .

[9]  S. Manton,et al.  The evolution of arthropodan locomotory mechanisms , 1972 .

[10]  T. Weis-Fogh Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals , 1973 .

[11]  C. Pond,et al.  The Role of the ‘Walking Legs’ in Aquatic and Terrestrial Locomotion of the Crayfish Austropotamobius Pallipes (Lereboullet) , 1975 .

[12]  W. J. Heitler The Locust Jump: III. Structural Specializations of the Metathoracic Tibiae , 1977 .

[13]  P W Webb,et al.  Hydromechanics of swimming. , 1978, Science.

[14]  N. Platnick,et al.  The Arthropoda: Habits, Functional Morphology, and Evolution , 1978 .

[15]  Joel W. Hedgpeth,et al.  The Arthropoda: Habits, Functional Morphology and Evolution , 1979 .

[16]  R. Wootton,et al.  Function, homology and terminology in insect wings , 1979 .

[17]  T. Daniel Unsteady Aspects of Aquatic Locomotion , 1984 .

[18]  M. Labarbera,et al.  Swimming in the pteropod mollusc, Clione limacina. I: Behaviour and morphology , 1985 .

[19]  Functional morphology of the wing apparatus and flight peculiarities in primitive moths (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae, Eriocraniidae) , 1985 .

[20]  R. Wootton,et al.  An Approach to the Mechanics of Pleating in Dragonfly Wings , 1986 .

[21]  A. Y. Cheer,et al.  Paddles and rakes: Fluid flow through bristled appendages of small organisms* , 1987 .

[22]  D. E. Alexander Kinematics of swimming in two species of Idotea (Isopoda: Valvifera) , 1988 .

[23]  A. R. Ennos THE IMPORTANCE OF TORSION IN THE DESIGN OF INSECT WINGS , 1988 .

[24]  A. R. Ennos The Inertial Cause of Wing Rotation in Diptera , 1988 .

[25]  A. R. Ennos,et al.  The implications of function on the origin and homologies of the dipterous wing , 1989 .

[26]  W. Kier The fin musculature of cuttlefish and squid (Mollusca, Cephalopoda): morphology and mechanics , 1989 .

[27]  A. R. Ennos Comparative functional morphology of the wings of Diptera , 1989 .

[28]  R. Wootton,et al.  FUNCTIONAL WING MORPHOLOGY AND AERODYNAMICS OF PANORPA GERMANICA (INSECTA: MECOPTERA) , 1989 .

[29]  K. Götz,et al.  The Wing Beat of Drosophila Melanogaster. II. Dynamics , 1990 .

[30]  Functional morphology of the wings of some representatives of the suborder Papilionina (Lepidoptera). , 1990 .

[31]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Leg design in hexapedal runners. , 1991, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  R. Wootton FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF INSECT WINGS , 1992 .

[33]  D. Furth,et al.  The independent evolution of the metafemoral spring in Coleoptera , 1992 .

[34]  Robert J. Full,et al.  Integrating the Physiology, Mechanics and Behavior of Rapid Running Ghost Crabs: Slow and Steady Doesn't Always Win the Race , 1992 .

[35]  J. Brackenbury Insects in Flight , 1992 .

[36]  C. A. Hui,et al.  Walking of the Shore Crab Pachygrapsus Crassipes in its Two Natural Environments , 1992 .

[37]  R. Wootton Leading edge section and asymmetric twisting in the wings of flying butterflies (Insecta, Papilionoidea) , 1993 .

[38]  R. Hessler SWIMMING MORPHOLOGY IN EURYCOPE CORNUTA (ISOPODA: ASELLOTA) , 1993 .

[39]  R. O'dor,et al.  Mechanics and Physiology of Animal Swimming: The role of fins in the competition between squid and fish , 1994 .

[40]  J. Brackenbury,et al.  Wing folding and free‐flight kinematics in Coleoptera (Insecta): a comparative study , 1994 .

[41]  A. K. Brodskiĭ,et al.  The evolution of insect flight , 1994 .

[42]  C. Ellington Unsteady aerodynamics of insect flight. , 1995, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[43]  Full,et al.  Static forces and moments generated in the insect leg: comparison of a three-dimensional musculo-skeletal computer model with experimental measurements , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[44]  R. M. Alexander,et al.  Leg design and jumping technique for humans, other vertebrates and insects. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[45]  Invertebrate swimming: integrating internal and external mechanics. , 1995, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[46]  Daniel Tl Invertebrate swimming: integrating internal and external mechanics. , 1995 .

[47]  Robin J. Wootton,et al.  Geometry and mechanics of insect hindwing fans: a modelling approach , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  M. Koehl Fluid flow through hair-bearing appendages: feeding, smelling and swimming at low and intermediate Reynolds numbers. , 1995, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[49]  Marshall,et al.  'Deep-sea spiders' that walk through the water , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[50]  Koehl Ma,et al.  Fluid flow through hair-bearing appendages: feeding, smelling and swimming at low and intermediate Reynolds numbers. , 1995 .

[51]  Robin J. Wootton,et al.  Two basic mechanisms in insect wing folding , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  Jamon,et al.  Variability of leg kinematics in free-walking crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, and related inter-joint coordination , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[53]  R. Merz,et al.  Jointed setae – their role in locomotion and gait transitions in polychaete worms , 1998 .

[54]  Full,et al.  Underwater punting by an intertidal crab: a novel gait revealed by the kinematics of pedestrian locomotion in air versus water , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[55]  Domenici,et al.  Curve walking in freely moving crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.