Students Learning Agroecology: Phenomenon-Based Education for Responsible Action

Abstract Preparing students for a complex and dynamic future is a challenge for educators. This article explores three crucial issues related to agroecological education and learning: (1) the phenomenological foundation for learning agroecology in higher education; (2) the process of students' interactions with a wide range of various learners within and outside the university environment; and (3) the unique characteristics of agroecology as a discipline and why these require different ways of learning than the conventional academic education. Phenomenology provides an epistemological foundation for learning about and interacting with the world outside the university. A profound aim is to bridge two learning communities: the university environment, where most traditional education takes place, and that of the stakeholder groups in farming and food systems. In this paper, we discuss several challenges of such a bridging activity: the integration of learning processes within the university with those in the case regions; the role of core and single discipline teachers; the role of the stakeholders; and the role of the students. Dealing with complex sustainability issues requires the assembly of a wide range of expertise in an inter-professional mode of collaboration. The article concludes that phenomenology and agroecology meet most fruitfully when phenomenology is done, when it is turned into actual efforts for promoting learning, and when phenomenon-based learning provides practical relevance for students to ground their knowledge in farms and in communities and this relevance of education leads to responsible action.

[1]  Charles Francis,et al.  Becoming an Agroecologist through Action Education , 2004 .

[2]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[3]  Nicholas R. Jordan,et al.  New Concepts in Agroecology: A Service-Learning Course. , 2005 .

[4]  Charles Francis,et al.  Spatial Focus of MSc and PhD Agricultural Research in Denmark, U.S., and Canada , 2007 .

[5]  B. Dahlin,et al.  Doing phenomenology in science education: a research review , 2008 .

[6]  R. Bawden.  A paradigm for persistence: a vital challenge for the agricultural academy , 2007 .

[7]  Sandra T. Barnes.  Paths toward a Clearing: Radical Empiricism and Ethnographic Inquiry , 1991, African Studies Review.

[8]  A. Wals,et al.  Education for Integrated Rural Development: transformative learning in a complex and uncertain world , 2004 .

[9]  S. Gliessman.  Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems , 2007 .

[10]  R. J. Salvador,et al.  Agroecology: The Ecology of Food Systems , 2003 .

[11]  M. Manen.  Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy , 1990 .

[12]  Nadarajah Sriskandarajah,et al.  Open-ended Cases in Agroecology: Farming and Food Systems in the Nordic Region and the US Midwest , 2009 .

[13]  J. Bligh,et al.  Students Learning from Patients: Let’s Get Real in Medical Education , 2008, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[14]  Charles Francis,et al.  Educational Perspectives in Agroecology: Steps on a Dual Learning Ladder toward Responsible Action1 , 2007 .

[15]  D. Tilley,et al.  Effectiveness of Inductive and Deductive Teaching Methods in Learning Agricultural Economics: A Case Study1 , 2004 .

[16]  Ray Ison,et al.  Learning Participation as Systems Practice , 2007 .

[17]  C. Harvey.  Husserl's phenomenology and the foundations of natural science , 1989 .

[18]  L. Boxelaar,et al.  Change Management and Complexity: The Case for Narrative Action Research , 2007 .

[19]  Erin M. Tegtmeier,et al.  External Costs of Agricultural Production in the United States , 2004 .

[20]  R. V. Hoek,et al.  The Knowing‐Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action , 2000 .

[21]  William B. Borgers.  DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION. , 1919 .

[22]  J. Porter,et al.  Challenges in designing ecological agriculture education: A Nordic perspective on change , 2001 .

[23]  Alexandre B. Lopes,et al.  The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action , 1999 .

[24]  T. Doré,et al.  Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review , 2009, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[25]  H. Barrows.  How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years , 1985 .

[26]  Alan Bleakley,et al.  From reflective practice to holistic reflexivity , 1999 .

[27]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Phenomenology of perception. , 1978, Science.

[28]  H. Edmund.  The crisis of the European sciences and the transcendental phenomenology , 1988 .

[29]  E. Eames,et al.  Dewey on Education , 1961, History of Education Quarterly.

[30]  T. Doré,et al.  Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review , 2009, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[31]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[32]  Ian McGill,et al.  Making sense of experiential learning : diversity in theory and practice , 1989 .

[33]  Opening the “black box” of agro-scientific expert knowledge — and bringing the perspectives back into the agricultural university , 2004 .

[34]  Charles Francis,et al.  Conceptual framework for structuring future agricultural colleges and universities in industrial countries , 1999 .

[35]  Nadarajah Sriskandarajah,et al.  Ecological Agriculture Research: Increasing Competence through PhD Courses. , 1999 .

[36]  B. Dahlin.  The Primacy of Cognition – or of Perception? A Phenomenological Critique of the Theoretical Bases of Science Education , 2001 .

[37]  B. Dahlin.  The Ontological Reversal: A figure of thought of importance for science education , 2003 .

[38]  Howard S. Barrows,et al.  Practice Based Learning: Problem Based Learning Applied to Medical Education , 1994 .