Making sense of complex data: a framework for studying students' development of reflective inquiry dispositions

TITLE: Making sense of complex data: A conceptual framework for studying students' development of reflective inquiry dispositions To make sense of complex data in inquiry, students must develop reflective modes of classroom work. This study examines the process of developing such reflective dispositions for individual students, in the context of a middle-school earth science inquiry unit designed by the researchers and collaborating teachers. Valid characterization of this learning process requires a conceptual framework through which to attend to the multiple variables that contribute to dispositional learning. The proposed conceptual framework identifies a reflective disposition as a property not just of the individual, but of the individual within an activity system. Relevant variables for study include elements of the classroom activity system, elements of the intended domain of reflective data analysis, and elements of the individual student's modes of understanding. These are proposed as three contexts of reflection, referred to as the " task context, " the " data context, " and the " role context. " This three-context framework for understanding reflection in inquiry is used as a tool for data analysis, characterizing the dispositional learning of each focus student in the study. Reflection was found to be an often-shared social process, shaping and being shaped by the negotiation of the meaning of activity. Learning was mediated by interactions between group interactional modes (in the task context) and individuals' roles (in the role context). Two focus groups studied were found to have markedly different modes of interaction: one characterized as a " comfort zone " for work with complex data, the other a " confrontation zone. " These modes afforded the development of different roles, or modes of participation, for each student. Learning to make sense of complex data was situated within the development of these new roles. The framework and data analysis suggest a coherent approach to representing social activity patterns, individual development, and content-area instructional goals within a common conceptual framework. This is a valuable contribution in that it locates other bodies of educational research in relation to one another.

[1]  James V. Wertsch,et al.  The Authority of Cultural Tools in a Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Agency , 1993 .

[2]  L. Schauble,et al.  Cross-Domain Development of Scientific Reasoning , 1992 .

[3]  J. Garbarino The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design: by Urie Bronfenbrenner Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979, 330 + p. , 1980 .

[4]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[5]  J. Clement,et al.  Effects of Student-Generated Diagrams versus Student-Generated Summaries on Conceptual Understanding of Causal and Dynamic Knowledge in Plate Tectonics. , 1999 .

[6]  W. Doyle Academic Work , 1983 .

[7]  Magdalene Lampert,et al.  When the Problem Is Not the Question and the Solution Is Not the Answer: Mathematical Knowing and Teaching , 1990 .

[8]  Karen Strohm Kitchner Cognition, Metacognition, and Epistemic Cognition , 1983 .

[9]  B. Rogoff Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship , 1995 .

[10]  Joseph L. Polman,et al.  Guiding science expeditions: The design of a learning environment for project-based science , 1997 .

[11]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[12]  Brian K. Smith,et al.  Combining General and Domain-Specific Strategic Support for Biological Inquiry , 1996, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[13]  A. M. White The Process of Education , 1994 .

[14]  D. Kuhn Children and adults as intuitive scientists. , 1989, Psychological review.

[15]  B. Rogoff Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .

[16]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Students' Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom , 1995 .

[17]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[18]  Joshua Radinsky,et al.  The progress portfolio: designing reflective tools for a classroom context , 1998, CHI.

[19]  樊希强,et al.  Cooperative Learning , 2020, Teaching High School Physics.

[20]  D. Gentner,et al.  Reasoning and learning by analogy. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[21]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognition in the Head and in the World: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Situated Action , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. , 1996 .

[23]  B. Reiser Developing reflective inquiry practices: A case study of software, the teacher and students: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings , 2001 .

[24]  J. Dewey The child and the curriculum , 1902 .

[25]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Cognition in Scientific and Everyday Domains: Comparison and Learning Implications. , 1991 .

[27]  Kris D. Gutiérrez,et al.  Script, Counterscript, and Underlife in the Classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education , 1995 .

[28]  John D. Bransford,et al.  A theory-driven approach to assessing the cognitive effects of PBL , 1997 .

[29]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Constraints or Guideposts? Developmental Psychology and Science Education , 1997 .

[30]  Ming Ming Chiu,et al.  Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices , 1999 .

[31]  Daniel C. Edelson,et al.  Problematizing Complex Datasets for Students: Design Principles for Inquiry Curriculum. , 1999 .

[32]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[33]  H. Sluiter [Learning by doing]. , 1977, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[34]  Brian K. Smith,et al.  National Geographic unplugged: classroom-centered design of interactive nature films , 1998, CHI.

[35]  J. Dewey How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[36]  Joshua Radinsky,et al.  The progress Portfolio: promoting reflective inquiry in complex investigation environments , 1997, CSCL.

[37]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  A Large-Scale Evaluation of an Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[38]  Paul W. Richardson The culture of education , 1996 .

[39]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Computer-assisted instruction and intelligent tutoring systems - shared goals and complementary approaches , 1992, Technology in education series.

[40]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  An Investigation of Problem Framing and Solving in a Grade 8 Open-Inquiry Science Program , 1994 .

[41]  C. Hirsch Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[42]  Susan Carey,et al.  "An Experiment Is When You Try It and See if It Works": A Study of Junior High School Students' Understanding of the Construction of Scientific Knowledge. , 1988 .

[43]  C SchankRoger,et al.  Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People , 1983 .

[44]  D. Perkins,et al.  Beyond Abilities: A Dispositional Theory of Thinking. , 1993 .

[45]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Connecting scientific and informal reasoning , 1993 .

[46]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Causal Models and Experimentation Strategies in Scientific Reasoning , 1991 .

[47]  David Klahr,et al.  Designing Good Experiments to Test Bad Hypotheses , 1989 .

[48]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Dynamic memory - a theory of reminding and learning in computers and people , 1983 .

[49]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Problem Solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics , 1996 .

[50]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided discovery in a community of learners. , 1994 .

[51]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[52]  K. Dunbar HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES , 1995 .

[53]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Evolving explanations in high school biology , 1997 .

[54]  Walter Doyle Managing Academic Tasks in High School Science and English Classes: Background and Methods. (R&D Report 6192). , 1985 .

[55]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[56]  Gerald L. Abegg,et al.  Geographic Information Systems: Implications for Problem Solving. , 1996 .

[57]  Lichu Lin,et al.  Language of and in the classroom: Constructing the patterns of social life , 1993 .

[58]  Sarah C. Goslee,et al.  Losing ground bit by bit: Low-income communities in the information age , 1998 .

[59]  J. Wertsch Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind , 1985 .

[60]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[61]  J. Hawkins,et al.  Practices of novices and experts in critical inquiry , 1987 .

[62]  Brian K. Smith Why Dissect a Frog When You Can Simulate a Lion? , 1996, AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 2.

[63]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  Some Elements of Discovery , 1981 .

[64]  S. Stein What's All the Fuss About? , 1996 .

[65]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Making Mathematics Problematic: A Rejoinder to Prawat and Smith , 1997 .

[66]  J A Starkweather,et al.  The computer as a tool for learning. , 1986, The Western journal of medicine.

[67]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring activities , 1983 .

[68]  S. Michaels,et al.  A pedagogy of Multiliteracies Designing Social Futures , 1996 .

[69]  J. Stigler,et al.  Teaching Is a Cultural Activity. , 1998 .

[70]  Kris D. Gutiérrez How talk, context, and script shape contexts for learning: A cross-case comparison of journal sharing☆ , 1993 .

[71]  R. Montemayor Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. , 1990 .

[72]  R. Schank Tell Me a Story: A New Look at Real and Artificial Memory , 1991 .

[73]  Daniel C. Edelson,et al.  Making sense of complexity : Dimensions for designing classroom inquiry activities , 1999 .

[74]  J. P. Smith Problems with Problematizing Mathematics: A Reply to Hiebert et al , 1997 .