The effects of text messaging on young novice driver performance

The current project aimed to evaluate, using the advanced driving simulator located at the Monash University Accident Research Centre, the effects of text (SMS) messaging on the driving performance of young novice drivers. Twenty participants drove on a simulated roadway which contained a number of events, including a pedestrian emerging from behind parked cars, traffic lights, cars turning right in front of the driver, a car following episode and a lane change task. The results revealed that retrieving and, in particular, sending text messages had a detrimental effect on a number of safety critical driving measures. When text messaging, drivers ability to maintain their lateral position on the road and to detect and respond appropriately to traffic signs was significantly reduced. In addition, drivers spent up to 400 per cent more time with their eyes off the road when text messaging, than when not text messaging. While there was some evidence that drivers attempted to compensate for being distracted by increasing their following distance when following a lead vehicle, drivers did not reduce their speed while distracted. Failure to do so in the real world could increase their risk of being involved in a crash as it increases the stopping distance required to avoid a collision. The practical implications of these findings are discussed. (a) For the covering record of the conference, please refer to ITRD abstract no E216954.

[1]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[2]  T. Marshall,et al.  Mobile phones and driving. , 2005, Journal of public health.

[3]  D. E Haigney,et al.  Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processes , 2000 .

[4]  Tim Horberry,et al.  The human factors of transport signs , 2004 .

[5]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Frank A. Drews,et al.  Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2003 .

[7]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  TRAVTEK EVALUATION TASK C3 CAMERA CAR STUDY , 1995 .

[8]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Driver distraction : a review of the literature , 2007 .

[9]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task , 1999 .

[10]  Frank A. Drews,et al.  What do Drivers Fail to See When Conversing on a Cell Phone? , 2004 .

[11]  Lawrence T Lam,et al.  Distractions and the risk of car crash injury: the effect of drivers' age. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[12]  Albert Kircher,et al.  Mobile telephone simulator study , 2004 .

[13]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  S J Westerman,et al.  Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: a critical review of research methodology , 2001, Ergonomics.

[15]  D. Taylor.  Mobile telephone use among Melbourne drivers: a preventable exposure to injury risk , 2004, The Medical journal of Australia.

[16]  Susan G. Hill,et al.  Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: Are paired comparisons necessary? In A , 1989 .

[17]  Andrew Parkes,et al.  HOW DANGEROUS IS DRIVING WITH A MOBILE PHONE? BENCHMARKING THE IMPAIRMENT TO ALCOHOL , 2002 .

[18]  Michael E Rakauskas,et al.  Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[19]  Reates Curry,et al.  AN ALTERNATE METHOD TO EVALUATE DRIVER DISTRACTION , 2002 .

[20]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[21]  Eric Rodgman,et al.  The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes , 2001 .

[22]  L Parmer Tijerina.  DRIVER WORKLOAD ASSESSMENT OF ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEM DESTINATION ENTRY WHILE DRIVING: A TEST TRACK STUDY , 1998 .

[23]  Paul Green,et al.  FURTHER ON-THE-ROAD TESTS OF DRIVER INTERFACES : EXAMINATION OF A ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEM AND A CAR PHONE , 1993 .

[24]  A. Hamish Jamson,et al.  Speech-Based E-Mail and Driver Behavior: Effects of an In-Vehicle Message System Interface , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[25]  M A Regan,et al.  A SIGN OF THE FUTURE I: INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS. IN: THE HUMAN FACTORS OF TRANSPORT SIGNS , 2004 .

[26]  A. McCartt,et al.  Drivers' use of handheld cell phones before and after New York State's cell phone law. , 2003, Preventive medicine.

[27]  David Shinar,et al.  Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  H Alm,et al.  The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.