Dynamic contrast‐enhanced ultrasound parametric imaging for the detection of prostate cancer

To investigate the value of dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐ultrasonography (US) and software‐generated parametric maps in predicting biopsy outcome and their potential to reduce the amount of negative biopsy cores.

[1]  M. Arditi,et al.  REAL-TIME CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND PARAMETRIC IMAGING IN PROSTATE , 2009 .

[2]  S. Shariat,et al.  Innovations in diagnostic imaging of localized prostate cancer , 2014, World Journal of Urology.

[3]  N. Salem,et al.  Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies , 2014, World Journal of Urology.

[4]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. , 2014, European urology.

[5]  David Moher,et al.  Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  David Cosgrove,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and prostate cancer; a multicentre European research coordination project. , 2008, European urology.

[7]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[8]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Angiogenesis in prostate cancer: onset, progression and imaging , 2012, BJU international.

[9]  Samir S Taneja,et al.  Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: sampling, labeling and specimen processing. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Karin Haustermans,et al.  Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer localization in correlation to whole‐mount histopathology , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  S. Boorjian,et al.  Mayo Clinic validation of the D'amico risk group classification for predicting survival following radical prostatectomy. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[12]  T. Loch,et al.  Computerized transrectal ultrasound of the prostate in a multicenter setup (C-TRUS-MS): detection of cancer after multiple negative systematic random and in primary biopsies , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[13]  A. Bjartell,et al.  Words of wisdom. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. , 2006, European urology.

[14]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in prostate cancer , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[15]  T. Agnew.  Words of wisdom. , 2005, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[16]  M. Remzi,et al.  Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. , 2012, European urology.

[17]  M. Mischi,et al.  Contrast-ultrasound dispersion imaging for prostate cancer localization by improved spatiotemporal similarity analysis. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  Feng Hua Li,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography with contrast‐tuned imaging technology for the detection of prostate cancer: comparison with conventional ultrasonography , 2012, BJU international.

[19]  O. Hélénon,et al.  Ultrasound elastography of the prostate: state of the art. , 2013, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.