Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions

Bone healing around dental implants follows the pattern and sequence of intramembraneous osteogenesis with formation of woven bone first of all followed later by formation of parallel-fibered and lamellar bone. Bone apposition onto the implant surface starts earlier in trabecular bone than in compact bone. While the first new bone may be found on the implant surface around 1 week after installation, bone remodeling starts at between 6 and 12 weeks and continues throughout life. Bone remodeling also involves the bone-implant interface, thus transiently exposing portions of the implant surface. Surface modifications creating micro-rough implant surfaces accelerate the osseointegration process of titanium implants, as demonstrated in numerous animal experiments. Sandblasting followed by acid-etching may currently be regarded as the gold standard technique to create micro-rough surfaces. Chemical surface modifications, resulting in higher hydrophilicity, further increase the speed of osseointegration of titanium and titanium-zirconium implants in both animals and humans. Surface modifications of zirconia and alumina-toughened zirconia implants also have an influence on the speed of osseointegration, and some implant types reach high bone-to-implant contact values in animals. Although often discussed independently of each other, surface characteristics, such as topography and chemistry, are virtually inseparable. Contemporary, well-documented implant systems with micro-rough implant surfaces, placed by properly trained and experienced clinicians, demonstrate high long-term survival rates. Nevertheless, implant failures do occur. A low percentage of implants are diagnosed with peri-implantitis after 10 years in function. In addition, a low number of implants seem to be lost for primarily reasons other than biofilm-induced infection. Patient factors, such as medications interfering with the immune system and bone cells, may be an element contributing to continuous bone loss and should therefore be monitored and studied in greater detail.

[1]  H. Schliephake,et al.  Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs. , 2010, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  Jae-Hyuck Shim,et al.  Osteoimmunology: A Brief Introduction , 2013, Immune network.

[3]  M. Cabrini,et al.  Effect of different surface finishing and of hydroxyapatite coatings on passive and corrosion current of Ti6Al4V alloy in simulated physiological solution. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[4]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. , 1995, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  K. Donath,et al.  The histopathology of different foreign-body reactions in oral soft tissue and bone tissue , 2006, Virchows Archiv A.

[6]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Spontaneously formed nanostructures on titanium surfaces. , 2013, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Titanium release from implants prepared with different surface roughness. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  P. Tengvall,et al.  Foreign Body Reaction to Biomaterials: On Mechanisms for Buildup and Breakdown of Osseointegration. , 2016, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[9]  C. Galli,et al.  Serotonin: a novel bone mass controller may have implications for alveolar bone , 2013, Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine.

[10]  S. Milz,et al.  Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants: a histological and histomorphometrical study in the maxilla of pigs. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  J. Lausmaa,et al.  Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[12]  P. Schupbach,et al.  Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[13]  J. Davies,et al.  Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. , 2003, Journal of dental education.

[14]  S. Milz,et al.  In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  L. Nolte,et al.  Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[16]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Is marginal bone loss around oral implants the result of a provoked foreign body reaction? , 2014, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[17]  D. Buser,et al.  Osseointegration of Zirconia in the Presence of Multinucleated Giant Cells. , 2016, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[18]  L Sennerby,et al.  Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of TiO(2) blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  J. Albina,et al.  Wound macrophages as key regulators of repair: origin, phenotype, and function. , 2011, The American journal of pathology.

[20]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Macrophage fusion and multinucleated giant cells of inflammation. , 2011, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[21]  G. Mailath,et al.  Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[22]  T Albrektsson,et al.  A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[23]  D. Buser,et al.  Bone apposition to a titanium-zirconium alloy implant, as compared to two other titanium-containing implants. , 2012, European cells & materials.

[24]  R. Tannenbaum,et al.  The roles of titanium surface micro/nanotopography and wettability on the differential response of human osteoblast lineage cells. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[25]  O. Pohler,et al.  [Tissue reaction to an implant of a titanium hollow cylinder with a titanium surface spray layer]. , 1976, Schweizerische Monatsschrift fur Zahnheilkunde = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie.

[26]  R. Glauser,et al.  The human bone-oxidized titanium implant interface: A light microscopic, scanning electron microscopic, back-scatter scanning electron microscopic, and energy-dispersive x-ray study of clinically retrieved dental implants. , 2005, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[27]  L. Skovgaard,et al.  Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: an experimental study with rabbits. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[28]  A. Holmen,et al.  Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[29]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. , 1987, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[30]  D. Proops,et al.  Do ‘passive’ medical titanium surfaces deteriorate in service in the absence of wear? , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[31]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[32]  D. Cochran,et al.  Tissue integration of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine. , 2011, Journal of periodontology.

[33]  N. Lang,et al.  Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[34]  Senichi Suzuki,et al.  Implant Stability Change and Osseointegration Speed of Immediately Loaded Photofunctionalized Implants , 2013, Implant dentistry.

[35]  N. Lang,et al.  Periodontal tissues and their counterparts around endosseous implants [corrected and republished with original paging, article orginally printed in Clin Oral Implants Res 1991 Jan-Mar;2(1):1-19]. , 1991, Clinical oral implants research.

[36]  B. Johanson,et al.  INTRA-OSSEOUS ANCHORAGE OF DENTAL PROSTHESES , 1970 .

[37]  G. Huynh-Ba,et al.  Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[38]  A. Lussi,et al.  Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[39]  P. Revell,et al.  The combined role of wear particles, macrophages and lymphocytes in the loosening of total joint prostheses , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[40]  L. Sennerby,et al.  Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit. , 2005, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[41]  B. Boyan,et al.  A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces II: Biological and clinical aspects. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[42]  H. Simmen,et al.  Biocorrosion and uptake of titanium by human osteoclasts. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[43]  Y. Konttinen,et al.  The response of macrophages to titanium particles is determined by macrophage polarization. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[44]  G. Huynh-Ba,et al.  The role of bone debris in early healing adjacent to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in man. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[45]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[46]  R. Miron,et al.  OsteoMacs: Key players around bone biomaterials. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[47]  G. Huynh-Ba,et al.  Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[48]  A. Sculean,et al.  Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. , 2014, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[49]  L. Rasmusson,et al.  Osseointegration of oxidized and turned implants in circumferential bone defects with and without adjunctive therapies: an experimental study on BMP-2 and autogenous bone graft in the dog mandible. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[50]  F. Hernández-Alfaro,et al.  Clinical evidence on titanium-zirconium dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[51]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance. , 1993, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[52]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Relative influence of surface topography and surface chemistry on cell response to bone implant materials. Part 2: Biological aspects , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[53]  L. Cooper,et al.  Molecular assessment of osseointegration in vivo: a review of the current literature. , 2013, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[54]  Oliver Hoffmann,et al.  Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[55]  G. Huynh-Ba,et al.  Transcriptional profiling of osseointegration in humans. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[56]  Lars Sennerby,et al.  Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. , 2008, Periodontology 2000.

[57]  R. Tannenbaum,et al.  The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[58]  D. Courvoisier,et al.  A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[59]  T. Wynn,et al.  Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[60]  P. Thomsen,et al.  Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone , 1993 .

[61]  H. Rack,et al.  Titanium alloys in total joint replacement--a materials science perspective. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[62]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[63]  L. Rasmusson,et al.  Early bone tissue responses to turned and oxidized implants in the rabbit tibia. , 2008, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[64]  Hyo Jeong Kim,et al.  Serotonin Inhibits Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Regeneration in Rats. , 2016, Journal of periodontology.

[65]  K. Koyano,et al.  Soft tissue sealing around dental implants based on histological interpretation. , 2016, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[66]  M. Dard,et al.  Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[67]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Metal degradation products: a cause for concern in metal-metal bearings? , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[68]  V. Everts,et al.  Osteoclast resorption of beta-tricalcium phosphate controlled by surface architecture. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[69]  J. Montero,et al.  Comparison of clinical performance of zirconia implants and titanium implants in animal models: a systematic review. , 2014, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[70]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Initial and long‐term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants , 2017, Periodontology 2000.

[71]  S D Cook,et al.  The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[72]  D Buser,et al.  Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[73]  L. Sennerby,et al.  Histology of retrieved immediately and early loaded oxidized implants: light microscopic observations after 5 to 9 months of loading in the posterior mandible. , 2003, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[74]  Lars Sennerby,et al.  Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone , 1993 .

[75]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[76]  E. Hunziker,et al.  Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[77]  D Buser,et al.  Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[78]  V. Ottani,et al.  Early detachment of titanium particles from various different surfaces of endosseous dental implants. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[79]  H. Terheyden,et al.  Osseointegration--communication of cells. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[80]  Ann Wennerberg,et al.  Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[81]  R. Nishimura,et al.  Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[82]  R. Miron,et al.  Health, Maintenance, and Recovery of Soft Tissues around Implants. , 2016, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[83]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. , 1988, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[84]  L. Sennerby,et al.  Early bone formation in furrows at titanium implants. A study in the rabbit tibia , 2010 .

[85]  C. Sim,et al.  Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[86]  N. Lang,et al.  Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[87]  D Buser,et al.  Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[88]  D Buser,et al.  Osseointegration: a reality. , 1998, Periodontology 2000.

[89]  Ann Wennerberg,et al.  A histomorghometric study of screw‐shaped and removal torque titanium implants with three different surface topographies , 1995 .

[90]  N. Lang,et al.  Temporal sequence of hard and soft tissue healing around titanium dental implants. , 2015, Periodontology 2000.

[91]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of c.p. titanium screws blasted with 25- and 75-microns-sized particles of Al2O3. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[92]  Niklaus P Lang,et al.  De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[93]  P. Branemark,et al.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Supplementum.

[94]  D Buser,et al.  What is This? Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on February 23, 2013 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. International and American Associations for Dental ResearchRESEARCH REPORTS , 2004 .

[95]  J Lindström,et al.  Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. , 1969, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[96]  D. Buser,et al.  Acid and alkaline etching of sandblasted zirconia implants: a histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. , 2014, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[97]  P. Schüpbach,et al.  Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants: a study in rabbits. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[98]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Current findings regarding zirconia implants. , 2014, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[99]  Niklaus P. Lang,et al.  Periodontal tissues and their counterparts around endosseous implants [corrected and republished with original paging, article orginally printed in Clin Oral Implants Res 1991 Jan-Mar;2(1):1-19]. , 1991 .

[100]  R. Nishimura,et al.  Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[101]  D. Buser,et al.  Early loading after 21 days of healing of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: two-year results of a prospective two-center study. , 2010, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.