A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks: 2. Discomfort, rating of perceived exertion and heart rate measures.

Although many manual handling activities involve combinations of pull, lift, carry, lower and push, there are few reports of investigation of how to assess the risk in these combination tasks. Two strategies have been suggested in the literature for estimating the risk in a combination task based on the measures of the separate components of that task. The aim of the study was to compare the risks assessed in single manual handling tasks with those in combination tasks. Ratings of discomfort, exertion and heart rate were collected from nine male and nine female students, performing combination and single tasks. Combination tasks consisted of sequences of pull, lift, carry, lower and push tasks. Combination tasks were performed at 1.min-1 and 3.min-1 whilst single tasks (lift, lower, push, pull and carry) were performed at 3.min-1 and 6.min-1. The rating of exertion and heart rate for each combination task was compared to the exertion rating and heart rate of the single tasks which comprised the combination task using repeated measures analysis of variance with specified contrasts. Similar comparisons for the discomfort data were performed using Friedman and Wilcoxon tests. In at least one of the twelve comparisons performed for each dependent variable, the combination task value was significantly different to each single task value. The differences occurred regardless of whether the most critical single task value or an average of all single task values was used. It was concluded that the risk in combination manual tasks can not be accurately assessed by using estimates from discomfort, exertion ratings and heart rate measures of single tasks.

[1]  S. P. Dutta,et al.  Energy cost models for combined lifting and carrying tasks , 1989 .

[2]  H Monod,et al.  Effects of dynamic, static and combined work on heart rate and oxygen consumption. , 1979, Ergonomics.

[3]  L M Straker,et al.  A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks: 1. maximum acceptable weight measures. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[4]  G. Borg.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. , 2019, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  S Gallagher,et al.  Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[6]  Ciriello Vm,et al.  The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces , 1990 .

[7]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  A Survey of Industrial Box Handling , 1982 .

[8]  A Mital,et al.  Perceived exertion of physical effort for various manual handling tasks. , 1983, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[9]  D. Price,et al.  The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain , 1983, Pain.

[10]  S H Snook,et al.  Further Studies of Psychophysically Determined Maximum Acceptable Weights and Forces , 1993, Human factors.

[11]  L M Straker,et al.  An investigation of discomfort experienced by dental therapists and assistants at work. , 1994, Australian dental journal.

[12]  D. Chaffin,et al.  Prediction of metabolic rates for manual materials handling jobs. , 1978, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.