Phase I therapy study of 186Re-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody U36 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

UNLABELLED A phase I therapy study was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, dosimetry, immunogenicity, and therapeutic potential of 186Re-labeled anti-CD44v6 chimeric monoclonal antibody (cMAb) U36 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). The potential of a diagnostic study with 99mTc-cMAb U36 to predict the biodistribution of 186Re-cMAb U36 was evaluated. METHODS Thirteen patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC were given 750 MBq 99mTc-cMAb U36 (2 mg) followed 1 wk later by a single dose of 186Re-cMAb U36 (12 or 52 mg) in radiation dose-escalating steps of 0.4, 1.0, and 1.5 GBq/m2. After each administration, planar and SPECT images were obtained, and the pharmacokinetics and development of human antimurine as well as anti-cMAb responses were determined. Radiation absorbed doses to tumor, red marrow, and organs were calculated. RESULTS Administration was well tolerated, and excellent targeting of tumor lesions was seen in all patients. Dose-limiting myelotoxicity (thrombocytopenia being most prominent) was the only toxicity observed, resulting in grade 4 myelotoxicity in 2 patients treated with 1.5 GBq/m2. The MTD was established at 1.0 GBq/m2, at which a transient grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen in 1 patient. One patient showed stable disease for 6 mo after treatment at the MTD. The 2 patients with dose-limiting myelotoxicity showed a marked reduction in tumor size. The reduction was of short duration and, therefore, not considered an objective response. Tumor absorbed doses at MTD ranged from 3.0 to 18.1 Gy. Red marrow doses ranged from 20 to 112 cGy (mean, 51 +/- 16 cGy/GBq) and correlated with platelet nadir (r = 0.8; P < 0.01). Pharmacokinetics varied between patients treated at the same dose level and were accurately predicted by the diagnostic procedure. Five patients experienced a human anti-cMAb response, 1 of which was a human antimouse antibody response. CONCLUSION This study shows that 186Re-cMAb U36 can be safely administered, with dose-limiting myelotoxicity at 41 mCi/m2. The use of cMAb U36 instead of its murine counterpart did not decrease the induction of human antibody responses. The availability of a 99mTc-labeled diagnostic study that can predict the pharmacokinetics of 186Re-cMAb U36 offers the possibility of using such a study for selection of a safe radioimmunotherapy dose.

[1]  G. Denardo,et al.  Practical determination of patient-specific marrow dose using radioactivity concentration in blood and body. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  W. Oyen,et al.  Phase I radioimmunotherapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with 131I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody G250. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[3]  O. Boerman,et al.  Absolute organ activity estimated by five different methods of background correction. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  S. Larson,et al.  Phase I/II radioimmunotherapy trial with iodine-131-labeled monoclonal antibody G250 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[5]  G. Snow,et al.  The impact of tumour volume and other characteristics on uptake of radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies in tumour tissue of head and neck cancer patients , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  S. A. Bush,et al.  Follow-up of relapsed B-cell lymphoma patients treated with iodine-131-labeled anti-CD20 antibody and autologous stem-cell rescue. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  G. Snow,et al.  Perspectives of combined radioimmunotherapy and anti‐EGFR antibody therapy for the treatment of residual head and neck cancer , 1998, International journal of cancer.

[8]  G. Snow,et al.  High dose rhenium‐186‐labeling of monoclonal antibodies for clinical application , 1997, Cancer.

[9]  Y. Vardi,et al.  Phase I/II clinical radioimmunotherapy with an iodine-131-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen murine monoclonal antibody IgG. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  K. Heider,et al.  Characterization of a high-affinity monoclonal antibody specific for CD44v6 as candidate for immunotherapy of squamous cell carcinomas , 1996, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[11]  G. Snow,et al.  Monoclonal antibody U36, a suitable candidate for clinical immunotherapy of squamous‐cell carcinoma, recognizes a CD44 isoform , 1996, International journal of cancer.

[12]  M. Juweid,et al.  Radioimmunotherapy of patients with small-volume tumors using iodine-131-labeled anti-CEA monoclonal antibody NP-4 F(ab')2. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Iodine-131-anti-B1 radioimmunotherapy for B-cell lymphoma. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  K. Heider,et al.  Splice variants of the cell surface glycoprotein CD44 associated with metastatic tumour cells are expressed in normal tissues of humans and cynomolgus monkeys. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[15]  G. Snow,et al.  Radioimmunoscintigraphy and biodistribution of technetium-99m-labeled monoclonal antibody U36 in patients with head and neck cancer. , 1995, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[16]  W. Eisterer,et al.  CD44 variant isoforms in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a new independent prognostic factor. , 1995, Blood.

[17]  P. Herrlich,et al.  CD44 variant exon epitopes in primary breast cancer and length of survival , 1995, The Lancet.

[18]  A. Maraveyas,et al.  Radiolabeled antibody combined with external radiotherapy for the treatment of head and neck cancer: reconstruction of a theoretical phantom of the larynx for radiation dose calculation to local tissues. , 1995, Cancer research.

[19]  G. Snow,et al.  Clinical screening of monoclonal antibodies 323/A3, cSF‐25 and K928 for suitability of targetting tumours in the upper aerodigestive and respiratory tract , 1994, Nuclear medicine communications.

[20]  P. Beaumier,et al.  Rhenium-186-labeled chimeric antibody NR-LU-13: pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and immunogenicity relative to murine analog NR-LU-10. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  M. Gerretsen,et al.  Labeling of monoclonal antibodies with rhenium-186 using the MAG3 chelate for radioimmunotherapy of cancer: a technical protocol. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  J. Cain,et al.  A phase I trial of a rhenium 186-labeled monoclonal antibody administered intraperitoneally in ovarian carcinoma: toxicity and clinical response. , 1993 .

[23]  H. Müller-Hermelink,et al.  Differential expression of CD44 splice variants in intestinal- and diffuse-type human gastric carcinomas and normal gastric mucosa. , 1993, Cancer research.

[24]  G. Snow,et al.  MAb U36, a novel monoclonal antibody successful in immunotargeting of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. , 1993, Cancer research.

[25]  A. Maraveyas,et al.  Asbestos fibers in the colonic wall. , 1974, British Journal of Cancer.

[26]  M. Gerretsen,et al.  186Re-labeled monoclonal antibody E48 immunoglobulin G-mediated therapy of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenografts. , 1993, Cancer research.

[27]  P. Beaumier,et al.  Dosimetry of rhenium-186-labeled monoclonal antibodies: methods, prediction from technetium-99m-labeled antibodies and results of phase I trials. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  G Sgouros,et al.  Bone marrow dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy: theoretical considerations. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  S. Lippman,et al.  Head and Neck Cancer , 1993, Cancer Treatment and Research.

[30]  J. Vanderheyden,et al.  Clinical experience with rhenium-186-labeled monoclonal antibodies for radioimmunotherapy: results of phase I trials. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  Martin Hofmann,et al.  A new variant of glycoprotein CD44 confers metastatic potential to rat carcinoma cells , 1991, Cell.

[32]  J. Eary,et al.  Considerations for Imaging Re-188 and Re-186 Isotopes , 1990, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[33]  T. Mackie,et al.  EGS4 Monte Carlo determination of the beta dose kernel in water. , 1990, Medical physics.

[34]  B. Wessels,et al.  Radionuclide selection and model absorbed dose calculations for radiolabeled tumor associated antibodies. , 1984, Medical physics.

[35]  G. Snow,et al.  Selection of monoclonal antibody E48 IgG or U36 IgG for adjuvant radioimmunotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[36]  D. Parker Colorectal cancer prognosis and expression of exon-v6-containing CD44 proteins. , 1995, Lancet.