Managing Uncertainty in Socio-Technical Enterprises using a Real Options Framework

Real options analysis has traditionally been applied to the valuation of capital investment decisions. More recently, real options have been applied to the valuation of flexibility in system design decisions. However, different applications of real options are often considered in isolation. This paper introduces an integrated real options framework that supports holistic decision making under uncertainty for enterprises. This is accomplished by first introducing a new characterization of a real option as a tuple consisting of a mechanism and type, which disambiguates among 1) patterns of mechanisms that enable flexibility and 2) the types of flexibility in an enterprise. A new classification of mechanisms and types of options based on “where” they are embedded within the enterprise architecture is then devised, in order to enable a more comprehensive consideration of real options opportunities. The enterprise architecture in this context is described in terms of eight enterprise views and their dependencies. Modeling of the enterprise dependencies using a coupled dependency structure matrix (C-DSM) may be leveraged to propagate the impact of uncertainties and identify feasible types and mechanisms of real options. Examples are presented from a mini air vehicle (MAV) project, where challenging decisions span technical and social dimensions.

[1]  Deborah Nightingale,et al.  ENGINEERING SYSTEMS MONOGRAPH , 2004 .

[2]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution , 2006 .

[3]  Eberhardt Rechtin Systems Architecting of Organizations: Why Eagles Can't Swim , 1999 .

[4]  Deborah Nightingale,et al.  ENGINEERING SYSTEMS : AN ENTERPRISE PERSPECTIVE , 2004 .

[5]  D. Hastings,et al.  Managing Operational Uncertainty with Real Options , 2007 .

[6]  T. Copeland Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2001 .

[7]  Stewart C. Myers,et al.  Finance Theory and Financial Strategy , 1984 .

[8]  Donna H. Rhodes,et al.  Enterprise Systems Architecting: Emerging Art and Science within Engineering Systems , 2004 .

[9]  Jason E Bartolomei Qualitative knowledge construction for engineering systems : extending the design structure matrix methodology in scope and procedure , 2007 .

[10]  P. Wright,et al.  Uncertainty and Human Capital Decisions: Traditional Valuation Methods and Real Options Logic , 2007 .

[11]  Identification of Real Options “ in ” Projects , 2006 .

[12]  Jaap Schekkerman,et al.  How to Survive in the Jungle of Enterprise Architecture Framework: Creating or Choosing an Enterprise Architecture Framework , 2003 .

[13]  R. Neufville Real Options: Dealing With Uncertainty in Systems Planning and Design , 2003 .

[14]  J.W. Dahlgren,et al.  Real Options and Flexibility in Organizational Design , 2007, 2007 1st Annual IEEE Systems Conference.