Mapping the landscape of climate engineering

In the absence of a governance framework for climate engineering technologies such as solar radiation management (SRM), the practices of scientific research and intellectual property acquisition can de facto shape the development of the field. It is therefore important to make visible emerging patterns of research and patenting, which we suggest can effectively be done using bibliometric methods. We explore the challenges in defining the boundary of climate engineering, and set out the research strategy taken in this study. A dataset of 825 scientific publications on climate engineering between 1971 and 2013 was identified, including 193 on SRM; these are analysed in terms of trends, institutions, authors and funders. For our patent dataset, we identified 143 first filings directly or indirectly related to climate engineering technologies—of which 28 were related to SRM technologies—linked to 910 family members. We analyse the main patterns discerned in patent trends, applicants and inventors. We compare our own findings with those of an earlier bibliometric study of climate engineering, and show how our method is consistent with the need for transparency and repeatability, and the need to adjust the method as the field develops. We conclude that bibliometric monitoring techniques can play an important role in the anticipatory governance of climate engineering.

[1]  J. Youtie,et al.  Refining search terms for nanotechnology , 2008 .

[2]  P. Oldham,et al.  Synthetic Biology: Mapping the Scientific Landscape , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  Alan Gadian,et al.  Marine cloud brightening , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Christopher W. Belter,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of climate engineering research , 2013 .

[5]  Shubham Agrawal,et al.  Reexamining the economics of aerosol geoengineering , 2013, Climatic Change.

[6]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Managing Technology in Society , 1995 .

[7]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[8]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of sea spray geoengineering and the role of injected particle size , 2012 .

[9]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[10]  B.J. Eastlund,et al.  Mission for Planet Earth: defining a vision for the space program , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[11]  Georgiy L. Stenchikov,et al.  Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections , 2008 .

[12]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  Sea spray geoengineering experiments in the geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP): Experimental design and preliminary results , 2013 .

[13]  H. Lamb Climate-engineering schemes to meet a climatic emergency , 1971 .

[14]  P. Rasch,et al.  The long-term policy context for solar radiation management , 2013, Climatic Change.

[15]  Gareth Davies,et al.  Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty , 2010 .

[16]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs , 2013, Scientometrics.

[17]  Jo Smith,et al.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  S. Chisholm,et al.  Ocean Fertilization Science, Policy, and Commerce , 2009 .

[19]  Rüdiger Röttgers,et al.  Deep carbon export from a Southern Ocean iron-fertilized diatom bloom , 2012, Nature.

[20]  R. B. Slimane,et al.  Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: a review. , 2008, Journal of environmental sciences.

[21]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Management of trade-offs in geoengineering through optimal choice of non-uniform radiative forcing , 2013 .

[22]  W. Walker Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations , 2000 .

[23]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[24]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[25]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[26]  Ray Quay,et al.  Anticipatory Governance , 2010 .

[27]  Alan Robock,et al.  20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea , 2008 .

[28]  Ø. Seland,et al.  Sensitivity to deliberate sea salt seeding of marine clouds – observations and model simulations , 2011 .

[29]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate CO2‐induced climate change , 2000 .

[30]  David W. Keith,et al.  End the Deadlock on Governance of Geoengineering Research , 2013, Science.

[31]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: The role of particle size , 2008 .

[32]  B. Jong,et al.  Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico , 2009, Agroforestry Systems.

[33]  D. Collingridge The social control of technology , 1980 .

[34]  A. Jones,et al.  Climate impacts of geoengineering marine stratocumulus clouds , 2009 .

[35]  David William Keith Geoengineering the Climate: History and Prospect 1 , 2000, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[36]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Transient climate–carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Markus Reitzig,et al.  On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed” , 2007 .

[38]  Ben Kravitz,et al.  A Test for Geoengineering? , 2010, Science.

[39]  B. Wynne Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out? , 2002 .

[40]  Sébastien Denvil,et al.  Robust direct effect of carbon dioxide on tropical circulation and regional precipitation , 2013 .

[41]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[42]  Marshall T. Poe,et al.  James Fleming, “Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control” , 2010 .

[43]  James Wilsdon,et al.  See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream , 2004 .

[44]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Global temperature stabilization via controlled albedo enhancement of low-level maritime clouds , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[45]  P. Rasch,et al.  Geoengineering by cloud seeding: influence on sea ice and climate system , 2009 .

[46]  K. Taylor,et al.  The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2011 .

[47]  P. David Path Dependence, its Critics, and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics’ , 2005 .

[48]  Dale Jamieson,et al.  Ethics and intentional climate change , 2020, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[49]  David W. Keith,et al.  Climate policy under uncertainty: a case for solar geoengineering , 2013, Climatic Change.

[50]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[51]  David M Schruth,et al.  Comparative metatranscriptomics identifies molecular bases for the physiological responses of phytoplankton to varying iron availability , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  David W. Keith,et al.  Public engagement on solar radiation management and why it needs to happen now , 2013, Climatic Change.

[53]  J. Tollefson Geoengineers get the fear , 2010, Nature.

[54]  T. Pohlmann,et al.  Typology of the Patent Troll Business , 2011 .

[55]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Regional climate response to solar-radiation management , 2010 .

[56]  A. Stirling “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[57]  P. Garrouste,et al.  Evolution and path dependence in economic ideas : past and present , 2001 .

[58]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Managing technology in society: the approach of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[59]  R. Lal,et al.  Carbon Sequestration , 2010 .

[60]  T. P. Hughes Networks of power : electrification in Western society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[61]  J. Shepherd,et al.  Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty , 2009 .

[62]  A. Whitmore,et al.  Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance , 2012 .

[63]  David H Guston,et al.  Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’ , 2014, Social studies of science.

[64]  C. Marchetti On geoengineering and the CO2 problem , 1977 .

[65]  T. Wigley,et al.  A Combined Mitigation/Geoengineering Approach to Climate Stabilization , 2006, Science.

[66]  P. Crutzen Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? , 2006 .

[67]  J. Blackstock,et al.  The Politics of Geoengineering , 2010, Science.

[68]  Simone Tilmes,et al.  The Sensitivity of Polar Ozone Depletion to Proposed Geoengineering Schemes , 2008, Science.

[69]  J. Soussana,et al.  Mitigating the greenhouse gas balance of ruminant production systems through carbon sequestration in grasslands. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[70]  K. Carslaw,et al.  Enhancement of marine cloud albedo via controlled sea spray injections: a global model study of the influence of emission rates, microphysics and transport , 2010 .