Dispersion Modeling to Compare Alternative Technologies for Odor Remediation at Swine Facilities

Abstract The effectiveness of 18 alternative technologies for reducing odor dispersion at and beyond the boundary of swine facilities was assessed in conjunction with an initiative sponsored through agreements between the Attorney General of North Carolina and Smithfield Foods, Premium Standard Farms, and Frontline Farmers. The trajectory and spatial distribution of odor emitted at each facility were modeled at 200 and 400 m downwind from each site under two meteorological conditions (daytime and nighttime) using a Eulerian–Lagrangian model. To predict the dispersion of odor downwind, the geographical area containing the odorant sources at each facility was partitioned into 10-m2 grids on the basis of satellite photographs and architectural drawings. Relative odorant concentrations were assigned to each grid point on the basis of intensity measurements made by the trained odor panel at each facility using a 9-point rating scale. The results of the modeling indicated that odor did not extend significantly beyond 400 m downwind of any of the test sites during the daytime when the layer of air above the earth’s surface is usually turbulent. However, modeling indicated that odor from all full-scale farms extended beyond 400 m onto neighboring property in the evenings when deep surface cooling through long-wave radiation to space produces a stable (nocturnal) boundary layer. The results also indicated that swine housing, independent of waste management type, plays a significant role in odor downwind, as do odor sources of moderate to moderately high intensity that emanate from a large surface area such as a lagoon. Human odor assessments were utilized for modeling rather than instrument measurements of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, or particulates less than 10 μm in diameter (PM10) because these physical measurements obtained simultaneously with human panel ratings were not found to accurately predict human odor intensity in the field.

[1]  J. Lawson,et al.  Occupational asthma in newly employed workers in intensive swine confinement facilities , 2004, European Respiratory Journal.

[2]  S. Wing,et al.  Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  S S Schiffman,et al.  Livestock odors: implications for human health and well-being. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[4]  S. Schiffman,et al.  Quantification of odors and odorants from swine operations in North Carolina , 2001 .

[5]  S. Schiffman,et al.  The effect of environmental odors emanating from commercial swine operations on the mood of nearby residents , 1995, Brain Research Bulletin.

[6]  S. Reynolds,et al.  A Control Study of the Physical and Mental Health of Residents Living Near a Large-scale Swine Operation , 1997 .

[7]  G. Katul.  An Investigation of Higher-Order Closure Models for a Forested Canopy , 1998, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[8]  Eulerian-Lagrangian model for predicting odor dispersion using instrumental and human measurements , 2005 .

[9]  Susan S. Schiffman,et al.  Symptomatic Effects of Exposure to Diluted Air Sampled from a Swine Confinement Atmosphere on Healthy Human Subjects , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  D. H. O'Neill,et al.  A review of the control of odour nuisance from livestock buildings: Part 3, properties of the odorous substances which have been identified in livestock wastes or in the air around them , 1992 .

[11]  Eulerian-Lagrangian model for predicting odor dispersion using instrumental and human measurements , 2005 .

[12]  E. Hammond,et al.  Odors of swine waste lagoons , 1989 .

[13]  D. H. O'Neill,et al.  A review of the control of odour nuisance from livestock buildings: Part 2, The costs of odour abatement systems as predicted from ventilation requirements , 1992 .

[14]  Jerry L. Hatfield,et al.  Characterization of volatile organic emissions and wastes from a swine production facility , 1997 .

[15]  A. Dravnieks,et al.  Atlas of odor character profiles , 1992 .

[16]  H. Troy Nagle,et al.  Handbook of Machine Olfaction: Electronic Nose Technology , 2003 .

[17]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Variability of olfactory threshold and its role in assessment of aging , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  S. Schiffman,et al.  Potential Health Effects of Odor from Animal Operations, Wastewater Treatment, and Recycling of Byproducts , 2000, Journal of agromedicine.

[19]  S. Schiffman,et al.  Odor from Industrial Hog Farming Operations and Mucosal Immune Function in Neighbors , 2004, Archives of environmental health.

[20]  S. V. Von Essen,et al.  Illness and injury in animal confinement workers. , 1999, Occupational medicine.

[21]  S. Levin,et al.  Mechanisms of long-distance dispersal of seeds by wind , 2002, Nature.

[22]  G. Katul,et al.  The Lagrangian Stochastic Model for fetch and latent heat flux estimation above uniform and nonuniform terrain , 1997 .

[23]  Jarett P. Spinhirne,et al.  Multidimensional gas chromatography-olfactometry for the identification and prioritization of malodors from confined animal feeding operations. , 2005, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[24]  Ji-Qin Ni,et al.  Odor and gas release from anaerobic treatment lagoons for swine manure. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[25]  Kevin A Janni,et al.  Odor, total reduced sulfur, and ammonia emissions from animal housing facilities and manure storage units in minnesota , 2003 .

[26]  S. Schiffman,et al.  Science of odor as a potential health issue. , 2005, Journal of environmental quality.

[27]  W. Sanderson,et al.  Asthma and Farm Exposures in a Cohort of Rural Iowa Children , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[28]  J. Blunden,et al.  Characterization of non-methane volatile organic compounds at swine facilities in eastern North Carolina , 2005 .