Dye-based identification of the orientation of tissue for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: A laboratory-based study

Purpose: To describe the features enabling the identification of the orientation of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) lenticule with the assistance of vital dyes. Methods: This is a blinded experimental lab-based study, including 30 microkeratome prepared precut DSAEK lenticules. The lenticules were divided into control and study arms which included 10 unstained and 20 stained lenticules, respectively. In the study arm, vital dyes like trypan blue (TB), brilliant blue (BB), indocyanine green (ICG) and fluorescein stain (FS) were used to stain 5 lenticules each. They were examined by experienced (group 1) and novice surgeons (group 2) to identify the correct orientation of the lenticule. The results were tabulated and analyzed. Results: Of the 30 lenticules examined, the average of total scores obtained by each observer was higher (78%) in group 1 as compared to group 2 (65.3%) which was statistically significant (P < 0.005). In group 1, the accuracy of identifying the correct orientation of unstained lenticules was 70% which improved to 82% on staining. The accuracy in group 2 was 58% with unstained lenticules which improved to 69% on staining. Within the study arm, irrespective of surgical experience, the accuracy was highest with BB (86%), followed by TB (82%), ICG (72%) and FS (62%). Conclusion: This study found that the accuracy of identifying the orientation of DSAEK lenticules increased with experience and with the assistance of staining using vital dyes. This accuracy improved with blue dyes like brilliant blue and trypan blue, irrespective of the level of experience.

[1]  J. Titiyal,et al.  ‘Acute-angled bevel’ sign to assess donor lenticule orientation in ultra-thin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty , 2019, BMJ Case Reports.

[2]  Marcus Ang,et al.  Long-term Visual Outcomes Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  Naoko Kato,et al.  Use of Brilliant Blue G in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, BioMed research international.

[4]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  Lutein and Brilliant Blue-Based Dye for Donor Preparation and Transplantation in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[5]  S. Feizi,et al.  Double-Ring Sign to Confirm Correct Orientation of Donor Lenticules During Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2015, Cornea.

[6]  S. Basak,et al.  Complications and management in Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: Analysis of consecutive 430 cases , 2014, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  H. Hashemi,et al.  Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Performed by Cornea Fellows , 2012, Cornea.

[8]  M. Macsai,et al.  Incidence of Presumed Iatrogenic Graft Failure in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2012, Cornea.

[9]  Christopher G. Stoeger,et al.  The Endothelial Safety of Using a Gentian Violet Dry-Ink “S” Stamp for Precut Corneal Tissue , 2012, Cornea.

[10]  K. Walter,et al.  Corneal edema after descemet membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the use of gentian violet staining. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  Graham A. Lee,et al.  Retained Interface Gentian Violet Ink in Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2012, Cornea.

[12]  G. Kymionis,et al.  Retrephination of eccentric donor graft for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Cornea.

[13]  M. Lombardo,et al.  Analysis of posterior donor corneal parameters 1 year after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) triple procedure , 2010, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[14]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Descemet ’ s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty : Safety and Outcomes , 2022 .

[15]  I. Bahar,et al.  Retrospective Contralateral Study Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty With Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2009, Cornea.

[16]  M. Terry,et al.  Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: Six-month Results in a Prospective Study of 100 Eyes , 2008, Cornea.

[17]  G. Kymionis,et al.  Descemet-stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK): Effect of Nontoxic Gentian Violet Marking Pen on DSAEK Donor Tissue Viability by Using Vital Dye Assay , 2008, Cornea.

[18]  V. Jhanji,et al.  Modification in Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: “Hitch Suture” Technique , 2006, Cornea.

[19]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[20]  Ying-Ting Chen,et al.  Comparison of dyes for cataract surgery. Part 1: cytotoxicity to corneal endothelial cells in a rabbit model. , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[22]  E. Pels,et al.  Biocompatibility of trypan blue with human corneal cells. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  A. Panda,et al.  Deep lamellar keratoplasty with trypan blue intrastromal staining. , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[24]  M. Norn PER OPERATIVE TRYPAN BLUE VITAL STAINING OF CORNEAL ENDOTHELIUM , 1980, Acta ophthalmologica.

[25]  E. Silva,et al.  FELLOWS , 1916, The Bulletin of the National Tax Association.