Network Hubs Buffer Environmental Variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Regulatory and developmental systems produce phenotypes that are robust to environmental and genetic variation. A gene product that normally contributes to this robustness is termed a phenotypic capacitor. When a phenotypic capacitor fails, for example when challenged by a harsh environment or mutation, the system becomes less robust and thus produces greater phenotypic variation. A functional phenotypic capacitor provides a mechanism by which hidden polymorphism can accumulate, whereas its failure provides a mechanism by which evolutionary change might be promoted. The primary example to date of a phenotypic capacitor is Hsp90, a molecular chaperone that targets a large set of signal transduction proteins. In both Drosophila and Arabidopsis, compromised Hsp90 function results in pleiotropic phenotypic effects dependent on the underlying genotype. For some traits, Hsp90 also appears to buffer stochastic variation, yet the relationship between environmental and genetic buffering remains an important unresolved question. We previously used simulations of knockout mutations in transcriptional networks to predict that many gene products would act as phenotypic capacitors. To test this prediction, we use high-throughput morphological phenotyping of individual yeast cells from single-gene deletion strains to identify gene products that buffer environmental variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find more than 300 gene products that, when absent, increase morphological variation. Overrepresented among these capacitors are gene products that control chromosome organization and DNA integrity, RNA elongation, protein modification, cell cycle, and response to stimuli such as stress. Capacitors have a high number of synthetic-lethal interactions but knockouts of these genes do not tend to cause severe decreases in growth rate. Each capacitor can be classified based on whether or not it is encoded by a gene with a paralog in the genome. Capacitors with a duplicate are highly connected in the protein–protein interaction network and show considerable divergence in expression from their paralogs. In contrast, capacitors encoded by singleton genes are part of highly interconnected protein clusters whose other members also tend to affect phenotypic variability or fitness. These results suggest that buffering and release of variation is a widespread phenomenon that is caused by incomplete functional redundancy at multiple levels in the genetic architecture.

[1]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  A comprehensive strategy enabling high-resolution functional analysis of the yeast genome , 2008, Nature Methods.

[2]  P. Rousseeuw,et al.  Partitioning Around Medoids (Program PAM) , 2008 .

[3]  B. Schneider,et al.  Ccr4 Alters Cell Size in Yeast by Modulating the Timing of CLN1 and CLN2 Expression , 2008, Genetics.

[4]  Ran Kafri,et al.  Preferential protection of protein interaction network hubs in yeast: Evolved functionality of genetic redundancy , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. Stephens,et al.  Chromatin-Associated Genes Protect the Yeast Genome From Ty1 Insertional Mutagenesis , 2008, Genetics.

[6]  Kriston L. McGary,et al.  Open Access Method , 2007 .

[7]  Joanna Masel,et al.  The evolution of bet-hedging adaptations to rare scenarios. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[8]  P. Hatzopoulos,et al.  Hsp90 canalizes developmental perturbation. , 2007, Journal of experimental botany.

[9]  Yoshikazu Ohya,et al.  Genetic Complexity and Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping of Yeast Morphological Traits , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[10]  Edward R Sumner,et al.  Phenotypic heterogeneity can enhance rare‐cell survival in ‘stress‐sensitive’ yeast populations , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[11]  S. Rutherford,et al.  Modularity and Intrinsic Evolvability of Hsp90-Buffered Change , 2006, PloS one.

[12]  S. Rutherford,et al.  Control of Canalization and Evolvability by Hsp90 , 2006, PloS one.

[13]  Vincent Debat,et al.  HSP90 AND THE QUANTITATIVE VARIATION OF WING SHAPE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  S. Sawyer,et al.  Positive selection of yeast nonhomologous end-joining genes and a retrotransposon conflict hypothesis , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  T. F. Hansen The Evolution of Genetic Architecture , 2006 .

[16]  R. Korona,et al.  Why Molecular Chaperones Buffer Mutational Damage: A Case Study With a Yeast Hsp40/70 System , 2006, Genetics.

[17]  A. Bergman,et al.  Functional and evolutionary inference in gene networks: does topology matter? , 2006, Genetica.

[18]  A. Fraser,et al.  Systematic mapping of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans identifies common modifiers of diverse signaling pathways , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[19]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[20]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[21]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[22]  D. Hartl,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary genomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[23]  Leonid Kruglyak,et al.  Telomere Length as a Quantitative Trait: Genome-Wide Survey and Genetic Mapping of Telomere Length-Control Genes in Yeast , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[24]  R. Waterston,et al.  Automated cell lineage tracing in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  C. Wilke,et al.  A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  Mike Tyers,et al.  BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  C. Wilke Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems , 2006 .

[28]  Jason B. Wolf,et al.  Evolutionary genetics : concepts and case studies , 2006 .

[29]  Taro L. Saito,et al.  High-dimensional and large-scale phenotyping of yeast mutants. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Kevin P. Byrne,et al.  The Yeast Gene Order Browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. , 2005, Genome research.

[31]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 Potentiates the Rapid Evolution of New Traits: Drug Resistance in Diverse Fungi , 2005, Science.

[32]  C. Pesce,et al.  Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system , 2005, Nature.

[33]  S. Leibler,et al.  Phenotypic Diversity, Population Growth, and Information in Fluctuating Environments , 2005, Science.

[34]  Fran Lewitter,et al.  Intragenic tandem repeats generate functional variability , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[35]  A. Wagner Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems , 2005 .

[36]  J. Masel Evolutionary Capacitance May Be Favored by Natural Selection , 2005, Genetics.

[37]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Mechanisms of Haploinsufficiency Revealed by Genome-Wide Profiling in Yeast , 2005, Genetics.

[39]  A. Wagner Robustness, evolvability, and neutrality , 2005, FEBS letters.

[40]  I. Dworkin Canalization, Cryptic Variation, and Developmental Buffering: A Critical Examination and Analytical Perspective , 2005 .

[41]  H. Garner,et al.  Molecular origins of rapid and continuous morphological evolution , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  J. Bader,et al.  A robust toolkit for functional profiling of the yeast genome. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[43]  David J. Earl,et al.  Evolvability is a selectable trait. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[45]  Martin Kupiec,et al.  A genome-wide screen for Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion mutants that affect telomere length. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  B. Birren,et al.  Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Nature.

[47]  Susan Lindquist,et al.  Under cover: causes, effects and implications of Hsp90‐mediated genetic capacitance , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[48]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Global Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network , 2004, Science.

[49]  Anders Blomberg,et al.  High-resolution yeast phenomics resolves different physiological features in the saline response , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  S. Rutherford,et al.  Quantitative trait symmetry independent of Hsp90 buffering: Distinct modes of genetic canalization and developmental stability , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[52]  M. J. van der Laan,et al.  A new partitioning around medoids algorithm , 2003 .

[53]  A. Bergman,et al.  Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks , 2003, Nature.

[54]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations , 2003, Nature.

[55]  Colin D. Meiklejohn,et al.  A single mode of canalization , 2002 .

[56]  M. L. Le Beau,et al.  Cancer predisposition and hematopoietic failure in Rad50(S/S) mice. , 2002, Genes & development.

[57]  Kyungjae Myung,et al.  Maintenance of Genome Stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.

[58]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[59]  A. Bergman,et al.  Waddington's canalization revisited: Developmental stability and evolution , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation , 2002, Nature.

[61]  Z. Gu,et al.  Extent of gene duplication in the genomes of Drosophila, nematode, and yeast. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[62]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants , 2001, Science.

[63]  M. R̆ic̆icová,et al.  Differentiated gene expression in cells within yeast colonies. , 2001, Experimental cell research.

[64]  M. Curcio,et al.  Multiple regulators of Ty1 transposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have conserved roles in genome maintenance. , 2001, Genetics.

[65]  R. Kolodner,et al.  Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Nature.

[66]  C. Pál,et al.  Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. , 2001, Genetics.

[67]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[68]  B. Garvik,et al.  Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. , 2001 .

[69]  B. Garvik,et al.  Principles for the Buffering of Genetic Variation , 2001, Science.

[70]  A. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[71]  M. Lynch,et al.  The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. , 2000, Science.

[72]  S. Palecek,et al.  Genetic analysis reveals that FLO11 upregulation and cell polarization independently regulate invasive growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Genetics.

[73]  G. Richard,et al.  Mini‐ and microsatellite expansions: the recombination connection , 2000, EMBO reports.

[74]  B. Roe,et al.  DNA structural properties of AF9 are similar to MLL and could act as recombination hot spots resulting in MLL/AF9 translocations and leukemogenesis. , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[75]  R. Mortimer Evolution and variation of the yeast (Saccharomyces) genome. , 2000, Genome research.

[76]  J. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[77]  Z. Yang,et al.  Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[78]  G. Wagner,et al.  Is Hsp90 a regulator of evolvability? , 1999, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[79]  Hiroki Inui,et al.  Mutations of a novel human RAD54 homologue, RAD54B, in primary cancer , 1999, Oncogene.

[80]  N. Kamada,et al.  Mutations in the RAD54 recombination gene in primary cancers , 1999, Oncogene.

[81]  G. Marsischky,et al.  Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[82]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution , 1998, Nature.

[83]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Dissecting the Regulatory Circuitry of a Eukaryotic Genome , 1998, Cell.

[84]  T. Weinert DNA Damage and Checkpoint Pathways Molecular Anatomy and Interactions with Repair , 1998, Cell.

[85]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[86]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[87]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[88]  R. Malone Dual regulation of meiosis in yeast , 1990, Cell.

[89]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[90]  C H WADDINGTON,et al.  Genetic assimilation. , 1961, Advances in genetics.

[91]  C. Waddington Canalization of Development and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters , 1942, Nature.