Visual attention to the main image of a hotel website based on its position, type of navigation and belonging to Millennial generation: An eye tracking study

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Social commerce and consumer search behavior: An eye-tracking study , 2018, AMCIS.

[3]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Online Reviews or Marketer Information? An Eye-Tracking Study on Social Commerce Consumers , 2017, I3E.

[4]  C. Ok,et al.  The power of design: How does design affect consumers’ online hotel booking? , 2017 .

[5]  A. Dedeke.  Travel web-site design: information task-fit, service quality and purchase intention. , 2016 .

[6]  K. Christianson,et al.  Visual attention toward tourism photographs with text: An eye-tracking study , 2016 .

[7]  Ying Wang,et al.  An Eye-Tracking Study of Tourism Photo Stimuli , 2016 .

[8]  Lefa Teng,et al.  The effect of online information sources on purchase intentions between consumers with high and low susceptibility to informational influence , 2016 .

[9]  Ping Chen,et al.  Text Simplification and Generation Y: An Eye Tracking Study , 2016 .

[10]  Lixuan Zhang,et al.  An Eyetracking Study on Online Hotel Decision Making: The Effects of Images and umber of Options , 2016 .

[11]  N. Malhotra,et al.  Measuring consumer design perceptions for digital devices: A multi-dimensional scale , 2015 .

[12]  Francisco Muñoz-Leiva,et al.  What type of online advertising is most effective for eTourism 2.0? An eye tracking study based on the characteristics of tourists , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Raffaele Filieri.  What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM , 2015 .

[14]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  Information technology and consumer behavior in travel and tourism: insights from travel planning using the internet. , 2015 .

[15]  Elena Marchiori,et al.  Studying Online Contents Navigation: A Comparison Between Eye-Tracking Technique and Self-Reported Investigation , 2015, ENTER.

[16]  Minjeong Kim,et al.  The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective , 2014 .

[17]  Yi-Ching Hsieh,et al.  Customer Response to Web Site Atmospherics: Task-relevant Cues, Situational Involvement and PAD , 2014 .

[18]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Return visits: a review of how Web site design can engender visitor loyalty , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Breffni M. Noone,et al.  Using Eye Tracking to Obtain a Deeper Understanding of What Drives Online Hotel Choice , 2014 .

[20]  Werner H. Kunz,et al.  Trust Development in E-Services: A Cohort Analysis of Millennials and Baby Boomers , 2013 .

[21]  Nikolaos F. Matsatsinis,et al.  Applying a Multicriteria Satisfaction Analysis Approach Based on User Preferences to Rank Usability Attributes in E-tourism Websites , 2012, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[22]  Juan Sánchez-Fernández,et al.  Generalising user behaviour in online travel sites through the Travel 2.0 website acceptance model , 2012, Online Inf. Rev..

[23]  M. Fenske,et al.  The Unengaged Mind , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[24]  S. Jang,et al.  The effects of dining atmospherics on behavioral intentions through quality perception , 2012 .

[25]  Kai-Christoph Hamborg,et al.  The effect of banner animation on fixation behavior and recall performance in search tasks , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Exploring the Business Potential of Social Media: An Utilitarian and Hedonic Motivation Approach , 2012, Bled eConference.

[27]  Kai-Christoph Hamborg,et al.  Time-Dependent Changes In Viewing Behavior On Similarly Structured Web Pages , 2011 .

[28]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  What Signals Are You Sending? How Website Quality Influences Perceptions of Product Quality and Purchase Intentions , 2011, MIS Q..

[29]  Cary C. Countryman,et al.  To book or not to book: the role of hotel web site heuristics , 2011 .

[30]  Kendall Goodrich.  Anarchy of effects? Exploring attention to online advertising and multiple outcomes , 2011 .

[31]  Dennis A. Pitta,et al.  Location-based social networking and marketing , 2011 .

[32]  Wei Chen,et al.  The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: An empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Catherine Demangeot,et al.  Consumer perceptions of online shopping environments: A gestalt approach , 2010 .

[34]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Efficiency, Trust, and Visual Appeal: Usability Testing through Eye Tracking , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[35]  Ulrike Gretzel,et al.  Innovation in the Web Marketing Programs of American Convention and Visitor Bureaus , 2010, J. Inf. Technol. Tour..

[36]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Eyetracking Web Usability , 2009 .

[37]  P. Benckendorff,et al.  Tourism and Generation Y. , 2009 .

[38]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Exploring human images in website design: a multi-method approach , 2009 .

[39]  Bing Pan,et al.  The Effect of Online Information Search on Image Development , 2009 .

[40]  Iis P. Tussyadiah,et al.  Mediating tourist experiences: access to places via shared videos. , 2009 .

[41]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Generation Y & Web Design: Usability Through Eye Tracking , 2008, AMCIS.

[42]  B. Sparks,et al.  The Effectiveness of Print Advertising Stimuli in Evoking Elaborate Consumption Visions for Potential Travelers , 2007 .

[43]  R. Pieters,et al.  Goal Control of Attention to Advertising: The Yarbus Implication , 2007 .

[44]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[45]  Jyun-Cheng Wang,et al.  The effects of attention inertia on advertisements on the WWW , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[47]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  When Should a Retailer Create an Exciting Store Environment? , 2006 .

[48]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten , 2005, TCHI.

[49]  Stanley Widrick,et al.  Attitude and age differences in online buying , 2005 .

[50]  Manuel J. Sánchez-Franco,et al.  Web acceptance and usage model: A comparison between goal-directed and experiential web users , 2005, Internet Res..

[51]  Gianfranco Walsh,et al.  Towards a Conceptual Model of Consumer Confusion , 2005 .

[52]  Lin Du,et al.  A framework for domain-specific search engine: design pattern perspective , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[53]  Guy W. Mullarkey,et al.  Factors Affecting Online Advertising Recall: A Study of Students , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[54]  Arthur A. Raney,et al.  At the movies, on the Web: An investigation of the effects of entertaining and interactive Web content on site and brand evaluations , 2003 .

[55]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  The Evolution of Electronic DistributionEffects on Hotels and Intermediaries , 2003 .

[56]  X. Drèze,et al.  Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? , 2003 .

[57]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Text or Pictures? An Eyetracking Study of How People View Digital Video Surrogates , 2003, CIVR.

[58]  W. Hoyer,et al.  Age, skill, and contextual cuing in target detection. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[59]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[60]  Robert L. Underwood,et al.  Packaging as Brand Communication: Effects of Product Pictures on Consumer Responses to the Package and Brand , 2002 .

[61]  Lei-da Chen,et al.  Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[62]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Visual Search Is Modulated by Action Intentions , 2002, Psychological science.

[63]  Heike Schaumburg,et al.  Why Are Users Banner-Blind? The Impact of Navigation Style on the Perception of Web Banners , 2006, J. Digit. Inf..

[64]  F. L. Ruch,et al.  Psychology and Life , 2001 .

[65]  Katherine Gallagher,et al.  The Medium Is Not the Message: Advertising Effectiveness and Content Evaluation in Print and on the Web , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[66]  M. Gilly,et al.  Shopping Online for Freedom, Control, and Fun , 2001 .

[67]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[68]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[69]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity , 1999 .

[70]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs , 1999 .

[71]  Rolf T. Wigand,et al.  Optimal experience of Web activities , 1999 .

[72]  Hairong Li,et al.  Cognitive Impact of Banner Ad Characteristics: An Experimental Study , 1999 .

[73]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Eye tracking the visual search of click-down menus , 1999, CHI '99.

[74]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[75]  Linda M. Scott,et al.  Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric , 1994 .

[76]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and Its Extendibility , 1994 .

[77]  A. Allport,et al.  Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action , 1987 .

[78]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[79]  M. Just,et al.  Eye fixations and cognitive processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.