Optimal Design of Hierarchic Components Platform under Hybrid Modular Architecture

Platform-based product family has been proven an effective strategy to economically provide wide market coverage. However, two practical platform design issues need to be properly handled: (1) commonized components require over-design of features that drives capability waste and additional costs with regard to the lower end product variants, and (2) commonization pattern of components is constrained by couplings of the base platform architecture. This research attempts to present a generic approach for the optimal platform design that treats commonization of components in a hierarchic manner under hybrid modular architecture. Three major sections are included: (1) identification of hidden interface costs defined by the architectural couplings, (2) modeling of hierarchic sharing relationship of commonized components across product variants, and (3) configuration of the hierarchic components platform for the lowest total production cost. Finally, a family of cordless drills targeting a series of rated output torques is employed to demonstrate the proposed approach.

[1]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[2]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[3]  Kikuo Fujita,et al.  Optimal Design Methodology of Common Components for a Class of Products: Its Foundations and Promise , 2003, DAC 2003.

[4]  Kikuo Fujita,et al.  Product Variety Optimization Simultaneously Designing Module Combination and Module Attributes , 2004, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[5]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures , 2000 .

[6]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures , 2002 .

[7]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  Assessing value in platformed product family design , 2001 .

[8]  Edward B. Magrab,et al.  Integrated product and process design and development : the product realization process , 2009 .

[9]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  A Method for Architecting Product Platforms , 2000 .

[10]  Gunnar Erixon,et al.  Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platforms , 1999 .

[11]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Design of Hierarchic Platforms for Customizable Products , 2002, DAC 2002.

[12]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality Within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm , 2004, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[13]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[14]  Jacek F. Gieras,et al.  Permanent magnet motor technology : design and applications , 1996 .

[15]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Platform Design for Customizable Products as a Problem of Access in a Geometric Space , 2003 .

[16]  Niklas Sundgren,et al.  Introducing Interface Management in New Product Family Development , 1999 .

[17]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Incorporating Design Complexity Measures in Architectural Assessment , 2003 .

[18]  Kevin Otto,et al.  A Multi-Criteria Framework for Screening Preliminary Product Platform Concepts , 2004 .

[19]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  DESIGN FOR VARIETY: A METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING PRODUCT PLATFORM ARCHITECTURES , 2000 .

[20]  Moreno Muffatto,et al.  Product architecture and platforms: a conceptual framework , 2002, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[21]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  Design for Flexibility: Performance and Economic Optimization of Product Platform Components , 2004 .

[22]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product Platform Design and Optimization: Status and Promise , 2003, DAC 2003.

[23]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Production Cost Modeling to Support Product Family Design Optimization , 2003, DAC 2003.

[24]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Fundamentals of Product Modularity , 1994 .

[25]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[26]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Product platform design: method and application , 2001 .