General indices to characterize the electrical response of the cerebral cortex to TMS

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with simultaneous high-density electroencephalography (hd-EEG) represents a straightforward way to gauge cortical excitability and connectivity in humans. However, the analysis, classification and interpretation of TMS-evoked potentials are hampered by scarce a priori knowledge about the physiological effect of TMS and by lack of an established data analysis framework. Here, we implemented a standardized, data-driven procedure to characterize the electrical response of the cerebral cortex to TMS by means of three synthetic indices: significant current density (SCD), phase-locking (PL) and significant current scattering (SCS). SCD sums up the amplitude of all significant currents induced by TMS, PL reflects the ability of TMS to reset the phase of ongoing cortical oscillations, while SCS measures the average distance of significantly activated sources from the site of stimulation. These indices are aimed at capturing different aspects of brain responsiveness, ranging from global cortical excitability towards global cortical connectivity. We analyzed the EEG responses to TMS of Brodmann's area 19 at increasing intensities in five healthy subjects. The spatial distribution and time course of SCD, PL and SCS revealed a reproducible profile of excitability and connectivity, characterized by a local activation threshold around a TMS-induced electric field of 50 V/m and by a selective propagation of TMS-evoked activation from occipital to ipsilateral frontal areas that reached a maximum at 70-100 ms. These general indices may be used to characterize the effects of TMS on any cortical area and to quantitatively evaluate cortical excitability and connectivity in physiological and pathological conditions.

[1]  M van de Velde,et al.  Detection of muscle artefact in the normal human awake EEG. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  Tomás Paus,et al.  Inferring causality in brain images: a perturbation approach , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Gabor filters: an informative way for analysing event-related brain activity , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  G. Tononi,et al.  Breakdown of Cortical Effective Connectivity During Sleep , 2005, Science.

[5]  D. Boussaoud,et al.  Direct visual pathways for reaching movements in the macaque monkey , 1995, Neuroreport.

[6]  Ursula Körner,et al.  From perception to action: phase-locked gamma oscillations correlate with reaction times in a speeded response task , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  G. Tononi,et al.  Triggering sleep slow waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Theory , 2002, NeuroImage.

[10]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Spatiotemporal Localization of Significant Activation in MEG Using Permutation Tests , 2003, IPMI.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  An empirical Bayesian solution to the source reconstruction problem in EEG , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian estimation of evoked and induced responses , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  MEG source localization under multiple constraints: An extended Bayesian framework , 2006, NeuroImage.

[14]  Juha Heiskala,et al.  Excitation threshold of the motor cortex estimated with transcranial magnetic stimulation electroencephalography , 2007, Neuroreport.

[15]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  R. J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Instrumentation for the measurement of electric brain responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[17]  Gregor Thut,et al.  A new device and protocol for combining TMS and online recordings of EEG and evoked potentials , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Early Neural Correlates of Conscious Somatosensory Perception , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  P M Rossini,et al.  Analysis of interhemispheric asymmetries of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields to right and left median nerve stimulation. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  Carlos M. Gómez,et al.  Wavelet analysis of the EEG during the neurocognitive evaluation of invalidly cued targets , 2008, Brain Research.

[21]  D. McRobbie,et al.  Thresholds for biological effects of time-varying magnetic fields. , 1984, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[22]  J. Pernier,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model , 2004, NeuroImage.

[24]  Päivi H. Laarne,et al.  Effect of EEG Electrode Density on Dipole Localization Accuracy Using Two Realistically Shaped Skull Resistivity Models , 2004, Brain Topography.

[25]  Seppo Kähkönen,et al.  The novelty value of the combined use of electroencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuroscience research , 2006, Brain Research Reviews.

[26]  P. Berg,et al.  A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  V. Amassian,et al.  Magnetic coil stimulation of straight and bent amphibian and mammalian peripheral nerve in vitro: locus of excitation. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  Allan H. Ropper,et al.  Evoked potentials in clinical medicine (second of two parts). , 1982 .

[30]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[31]  M. Stuchly,et al.  Modeling of magnetic field stimulation of bent neurons , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Time‐dependent changes in effective connectivity measured with PET , 1993 .

[33]  S Laureys,et al.  Restoration of thalamocortical connectivity after recovery from persistent vegetative state , 2000, The Lancet.

[34]  Jyrki P. Mäkelä,et al.  Reproducibility of TMS—Evoked EEG responses , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[35]  C. Phillips,et al.  Impaired Effective Cortical Connectivity in Vegetative State: Preliminary Investigation Using PET , 1999, NeuroImage.

[36]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[37]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Three-dimensional head model Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  Joseph A Maldjian,et al.  Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas , 2004, NeuroImage.

[39]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  The elusive concept of brain connectivity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[40]  Seppo Kähkönen,et al.  The effect of stimulus intensity on brain responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[41]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Converging Intracranial Markers of Conscious Access , 2009, PLoS biology.

[42]  C. Schroeder,et al.  A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  V. Walsh,et al.  Diffusion tensor MRI-based estimation of the influence of brain tissue anisotropy on the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[44]  R. J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation produces intensity-dependent EEG responses in humans , 2005, NeuroImage.

[45]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity , 1997, Neuroreport.

[46]  C. Gross,et al.  Topographical organization of cortical afferents to extrastriate visual area PO in the macaque: A dual tracer study , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[47]  Andy C. H. Lee,et al.  “Pray or Prey?” Dissociation of Semantic Memory Retrieval from Episodic Memory Processes Using Positron Emission Tomography and a Novel Homophone Task , 2002, NeuroImage.

[48]  Philippe A. Chouinard,et al.  Changes in effective connectivity of the primary motor cortex in stroke patients after rehabilitative therapy , 2006, Experimental Neurology.

[49]  Katsuyuki Sakai,et al.  Task-specific signal transmission from prefrontal cortex in visual selective attention , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Takashi Maeno,et al.  Measurement of evoked electroencephalography induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2003 .