Evidence for the hierarchical structure of instrumental learning

In three experiments using rats, we examined the role of a discriminative stimulus (S) in governing the relation between a response (R) and an outcome (O) in an appetitive instrumental learning paradigm. In each experiment, we attempted to distinguish between a simple S-O association and a hierarchical relation in which S is associated with the R-O association. We used three variations on discriminative training procedures and three different assessment techniques-for revealing the hierarchical structure. In Experiment 1, we employed a training procedure in which S signaled a change in the R-O relation but no change in the likelihood of O. Although such an arrangement should not produce an excitatory S-O association, it nevertheless generated an S that controlled responding and transferred that control to other responses. In Experiment 2, we used a discrimination procedure in which two Ss each had the same two Rs and Os occur in their presence but each S signaled that a different R-O combination would be in effect. This design provided the opportunity for equivalent pairwise associations among S, R, and O but unique hierarchical relations. The subjects learned the hierarchical structure, as revealed by the specific depressive effect of a subsequent lithium-chloride-induced devaluation of O on responding only in the presence of the S in which that response had led to that outcome. In Experiment 3, one S signaled two different R-O outcomes. Then, two new stimuli were presented with the original S; the R-O relations were retained in the presence of one of the added stimuli but were rearranged in the presence of the other. The added S came to control less responding when it was redundant with respect to the R-O relations than when it was informative. Although all of the results were of modest size and each has an alternative interpretation, together they provide converging evidence for the hierarchical role of S in controlling an R-O association.

[1]  B. Skinner,et al.  Principles of Behavior , 1944 .

[2]  C. L. Hull Principles of Behavior , 1945 .

[3]  J. Konorski Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. , 1948 .

[4]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. , 1967, Psychological review.

[5]  L. Kamin Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning , 1967 .

[6]  L. Kamin Attention-like processes in classical conditioning , 1967 .

[7]  R. Rescorla Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  W. Henton,et al.  Operant acceleration during a pre-reward stimulus. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  D. Meltzer,et al.  Conditioned suppression and conditioned enhancement with the same positive UCS: an effect of CS duration. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  K. Lattal,et al.  Some effects of response independent reinforcers in multiple schedules. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  B. Schwartz,et al.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  R. Weisman,et al.  Discrimination of a response-independent component in a multiple schedule. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  D. R. Williams,et al.  Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  R. Boakes Response decrements produced by extinction and by response-independent reinforcement. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  D. Kelly Suppression of random-ratio and acceleration of temporally spaced responding by the same prereward stimulus in monkeys. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  R. Hamm,et al.  Conditioned enhancement as a function of schedule of reinforcement , 1974 .

[17]  R. C. Huff,et al.  Some effects of response-independent reinforcement on auditory generalization gradients. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  P. J. Bersh,et al.  The discriminative control of free-operant avoidance despite exposure to shock during the stimulus correlated with nonreinforcement. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  K. Spence Behavior Theory and Conditioning , 1978 .

[20]  R. Hamm,et al.  Differential conditioning of conditioned enhancement and positive conditioned suppression , 1978 .

[21]  R. Claire-Smith The Overshadowing and Blocking of Punishment , 1979 .

[22]  R. Claire-Smith The overshadowing of instrumental conditioning by a stimulus that predicts reinforcement better than the response , 1979 .

[23]  P. Holland,et al.  Behavioral Studies of Associative Learning in Animals , 1982 .

[24]  David J. Baxter,et al.  Reinforcer and response specificity in appetitive transfer of control , 1982 .

[25]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Conditioning And Associative Learning , 1983 .

[26]  P. Durlach Effect of signaling intertrial unconditioned stimuli in autoshaping. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[27]  Marc Green,et al.  Inhibition and facilitation of apparent motion by real motion , 1983, Vision Research.

[28]  P. Lovibond Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus. , 1983 .

[29]  J. Bruce Overmier,et al.  Pavlovian conditioned stimulus effects upon instrumental choice behavior are reinforcer specific , 1983 .

[30]  P. Lovibond Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[31]  P. DeVito Conditioned Inhibition and Extinction , 1984 .

[32]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Postconditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. , 1985 .

[33]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Associative Structures In Instrumental Learning , 1986 .

[34]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning. , 1988 .