Effects of Drought and Elevated CO2 on Plant Water Use Efficiency and Productivity

The biomass water use efficiency of specific crops is usually almost constant at any given ambient CO2 concentration when normalised for the evaporative demand of the environment, regardless of the severity of water stress. This conservative behaviour is rooted in two basic tenets of plant productivity, the capture of radiation and assimilation of CO2 in exchange for water lost. The dominant factor is probably radiation capture, which supplies the energy for both transpiration and photosynthesis. Radiation capture depends on the extent of canopy cover, and hence on leaf growth, a process most sensitive to water stress. When canopy cover is incomplete, even mild water stress may reduce leaf growth and radiation interception in a way that compounds with time, leading to closely linked reductions in assimilation and transpiration. If canopy cover is complete, water stress, when severe enough, may reduce photosynthesis and stomatal opening. The intercellular CO2 concentration (C i ), however, remains constant in many instances, and decreases in others. Using the equations for CO2 transport only in the gaseous phase and the equation for transpiration, and taking energy balance into account, it is shown that the photosynthetic WUE of single leaves decreases in the case of constant C i , and remains about the same or increases in the case of decreased C i , depending on the magnitude of the changes in C i -and leaf temperature. Elevated CO2 reduces stomatal aperture, steepens the CO2 gradient for assimilation and accelerates the development of leaf area, particularly in C3 plants. The first effect lowers transpiration per unit effective leaf area. The reduction, however, may not be large due to energy balance requirements, especially for closed canopies under low wind conditions. The second effect raises C i , sufficiently despite the lower stomatal conductance to effect a net increase in photosynthesis per unit effective leaf area. The combined impact of the first two effects on WUE, again evaluated using the equations for assimilation and transpiration, is that the percentage increase in photosynthetic WUE due to elevated CO2 is almost proportional to the ratio of the new to the original concentration of CO2, in agreement with some published data. The third effect of enhancing leaf area development would be to increase both transpiration and photosynthesis per unit land area prior to the completion of canopy cover, but this would have little effect on photosynthetic WUE. In contrast, consumptive WUE may improve as a consequence of soil shading and reduced soil evaporation. The compounding effect with time of elevated CO2 when the canopy is incomplete provides an explanation for the phenomenon of a disproportionately larger enhancement of biomass compared to the enhancement in photosynthesis per unit leaf area effected by elevated CO2. Effects of water stress on photosynthetic WUE under high CO2 should be minimal and similar to those observed under normal CO2 concentrations. The conceptual framework provided by the aforementioned equations offers a rational basis for the systematic evaluation of WUE, although its application at the canopy level remains to be tested.

[1]  T. Hsiao,et al.  Physiological Consequences of Cellular Water Deficits 1sa , 1983 .

[2]  P. Cellier,et al.  Flux-gradient relationships above tall plant canopies , 1992 .

[3]  E. T. Kanemasu,et al.  A note of caution concerning the relationship between cumulated intercepted solar radiation and crop growth , 1992 .

[4]  A. Held,et al.  Bowen ratio/energy balance technique for estimating crop net CO2 assimilation, and comparison with a canopy chamber , 1990 .

[5]  Derek Eamus,et al.  The interaction of rising CO2 and temperatures with water use efficiency , 1991 .

[6]  J. Boyer,et al.  Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. , 1970, Plant physiology.

[7]  K. Mccree Photosynthetically Active Radiation , 1981 .

[8]  T. Hsiao Plant Responses to Water Stress , 1973 .

[9]  R. Arkley Relationships between plant growth and transpiration , 1963 .

[10]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Response of Photosynthesis, Stomatal Conductance and Water Use Efficiency to Elevated CO2 and Nutrient Supply in Acclimated Seedlings of Phaseolus vulgaris L. , 1992 .

[11]  T. Jones,et al.  RESPONSE OF SUNFLOWER TO STRATEGIES OF IRRIGATION III. CROP PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND TRANSPIRATION , 1985 .

[12]  T. Hsiao,et al.  Physiological Responses to Moderate Water Stress , 1982 .

[13]  E. Kanemasu Yield and Water-Use Relationships: Some Problems of Relating Grain Yield to Transpiration 1 , 1983 .

[14]  R. Mitchell,et al.  The effects of increasing CO2 on crop photosynthesis and productivity: a review of field studies , 1991 .

[15]  K. G. McNaughton,et al.  Stomatal Control of Transpiration: Scaling Up from Leaf to Region , 1986 .

[16]  O. Lange Responses to the physical environment , 1981 .

[17]  J. Hesketh,et al.  Light and Carbon Assimilation by Plant Communities 1 , 1967 .

[18]  W. Ruhland Encyclopedia of plant physiology. , 1958 .

[19]  J. Morison,et al.  Intercellular CO_2 Concentration and Stomatal Response to CO_2 , 1987 .

[20]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity , 1979, Nature.

[21]  C. Osmond,et al.  Encyclopedia of plant physiology. New series. Volume 12B. Physiological plant ecology II. Water relations and carbon assimilation. , 2011 .

[22]  P. Sale Net Carbon Exchange Rates of Field-grown Crops in Relation to Irradiance and Dry Weight Accumulation , 1977 .

[23]  N. Turner,et al.  Plant Productivity in the Arid and Semiarid Zones , 1978 .

[24]  C. E. Powell,et al.  Influence of Elevated CO2 and Temperature on the Photosynthesis and Respiration of White Clover Dependent on N2 Fixation , 1992 .

[25]  J. Monteith,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[26]  D. Ratkowsky,et al.  Photosynthesis of wheat under field conditions. IV. The influence of density and leaf area index on the response to radiation , 1971 .

[27]  D W Henderson,et al.  Immediate and subsequent growth responses of maize leaves to changes in water status. , 1971, Plant physiology.

[28]  S. Verma,et al.  Modeling canopy photosynthesis: scaling up from a leaf to canopy in a temperate grassland ecosystem , 1991 .

[29]  S. Idso,et al.  Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on root: Shoot ratios of carrot, radish, cotton and soybean☆ , 1988 .

[30]  John L. Monteith,et al.  Vegetation and the atmosphere , 1975 .

[31]  Glyn M. Rimmington,et al.  Modelling plant growth and development , 1986 .

[32]  P. Jarvis,et al.  The Direct Effects of Increase in the Global Atmospheric CO2 Concentration on Natural and Commercial Temperate Trees and Forests , 1989 .

[33]  Howard M. Taylor,et al.  Water Use in Agriculture. (Book Reviews: Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production) , 1984 .

[34]  J. Morison,et al.  Sensitivity of stomata and water use efficiency to high CO2 , 1985 .

[35]  M. Kirkham Book reviewDrought resistance in crops with emphasis on rice: International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna/Manila, The Philippines, 1982. 414 pp., US$16.25 plus airmail (US$14.50) or surface mail (US$1.75) postage. ISBN 971-104-078-6 , 1984 .

[36]  Claude Varlet-Grancher,et al.  Mise au point: Rayonnement solaire absorbé ou intercepté par un couvert végétal , 1989 .

[37]  John Philip Cooper,et al.  Photosynthesis and productivity in different environments , 1976 .

[38]  R. Loomis,et al.  Vegetative Growth of Corn as Affected by Population Density. I. Productivity in Relation to Interception of Solar Radiation 1 , 1965 .

[39]  L. H. Allen Plant Responses to Rising Carbon Dioxide and Potential Interactions with Air Pollutants , 1990 .

[40]  P. Biscoe,et al.  Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals , 1978, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[41]  James W. Jones,et al.  Seasonal Carbon and Water Balances of Soybeans Grown Under Stress Treatments in Sunlit Chambers , 1985 .

[42]  William J. Campbell,et al.  Response of Soybean Canopy Photosynthesis to CO2 Concentration, Light, and Temperature , 1990 .

[43]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis , 1989 .

[44]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis , 1982 .

[45]  James W. Jones,et al.  Interactive effects of water and nitrogen stresses on carbon and water vapor exchange of corn canopies , 1986 .

[46]  E. Fereres,et al.  Water-stress effects on the carbon exchange rates of three upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivars in the field , 1989 .

[47]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Dryland Evaporative Flux in a Subhumid Climate: II. Plant Influences1 , 1971 .

[48]  C. Osmond,et al.  Physiological Plant Ecology I , 1981, Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology.

[49]  C. T. de Wit,et al.  Transpiration and crop yields. , 1958 .

[50]  S. B. Idso,et al.  Increasing atmospheric CO2: effects on crop yield, water use and climate , 1983 .

[51]  J. Monteith Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[52]  L. D. Incoll Prediction and measurement of photosynthetic productivity , 1972 .

[53]  K. G. McNaughton,et al.  Effects of spatial scale on stomatal control of transpiration , 1991 .

[54]  T. Rufty,et al.  Alterations in Soybean Leaf Development and Photosynthesis in a Co2- Enriched Atmosphere , 1989, Botanical Gazette.