Implementation and workflow for PET monitoring of therapeutic ion irradiation: a comparison of in-beam, in-room, and off-line techniques

An independent assessment of the dose delivery in ion therapy can be performed using positron emission tomography (PET). For that a distribution of positron emitters which appear as the result of interaction between ions of the therapeutic beam and the irradiated tissue is measured during or after the irradiation. Three concepts for PET monitoring implemented in various therapy facilities are considered in this paper. The in-beam PET concept relies on the PET measurement performed simultaneously to the irradiation by means of a PET scanner which is completely integrated into the irradiation site. The in-room PET concept allows measurement immediately after irradiation by a standalone PET scanner which is installed very close to the irradiation site. In the off-line PET scenario the measurement is performed by means of a standalone PET/CT scanner 10-30 min after the irradiation. These three concepts were evaluated according to image quality criteria, integration costs, and their influence onto the workflow of radiotherapy. In-beam PET showed the best performance. However, the integration costs were estimated as very high for this modality. Moreover, the performance of in-beam PET depends heavily on type and duty cycle of the accelerator. The in-room PET is proposed for planned therapy facilities as a good compromise between the quality of measured data and integration efforts. For facilities which are close to the nuclear medicine departments off-line PET can be suggested under several circumstances.

[1]  Hiroshi Uchida,et al.  Dose-volume delivery guided proton therapy using beam on-line PET system. , 2006, Medical physics.

[2]  Katia Parodi,et al.  The modelling of positron emitter production and PET imaging during carbon ion therapy , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  On the effectiveness of ion range determination from in-beam PET data , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  Evaluation Scheme for a Positron Emission Tomography System Used in Monitoring of Radiation Therapy , 2009, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.

[5]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Accuracy of proton beam range verification using post-treatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography as function of treatment site. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Katia Parodi,et al.  In-beam PET measurements of biological half-lives of 12C irradiation induced β+-activity , 2008, Acta oncologica.

[7]  K. Parodi,et al.  The FLUKA code for application of Monte Carlo methods to promote high precision ion beam therapy , 2010 .

[8]  K. Parodi,et al.  Results of a 20 minutes decay measurement of a patient irradiation by the in-beam PET scanner , 2008 .

[9]  W. Enghardt,et al.  Measurement of radiation hardness of PET components , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[10]  Katia Parodi,et al.  A filtering approach based on Gaussian–powerlaw convolutions for local PET verification of proton radiotherapy , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  K Parodi,et al.  Dose quantification from in-beam positron emission tomography. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Katia Parodi,et al.  On the feasibility of dose quantification with in-beam PET data in radiotherapy with 12C and proton beams , 2010 .

[13]  D W Litzenberg,et al.  On-line monitoring of radiotherapy beams: experimental results with proton beams. , 1999, Medical physics.

[14]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Comparison between in-beam and offline positron emission tomography imaging of proton and carbon ion therapeutic irradiation at synchrotron- and cyclotron-based facilities. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  K. Parodi,et al.  Suppression of random coincidences during in-beam PET measurements at ion beam radiotherapy facilities , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[17]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Charged hadron tumour therapy monitoring by means of PET , 2004 .