Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods.

[1]  A. Hannam,et al.  Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of virtual interocclusal records. , 2020, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  M. Ferrari,et al.  Precision of maxillo-mandibular registration with intraoral scanners in vitro. , 2020, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[3]  N. Beyth,et al.  Influence of jaw opening on occlusal vertical dimension between incisors and molars. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  Priscilla Medina‐Sotomayor,et al.  Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  Kelton T Stewart,et al.  Precision of the virtual occlusal record. , 2019, The Angle orthodontist.

[6]  M. Wichmann,et al.  Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular deformation during mouth opening. , 2019, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[7]  A. Mehl,et al.  Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. , 2019, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[8]  Faraj Edher,et al.  The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning , 2018, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  K. Tan,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Static Interocclusal Registration by Three Intraoral Scanner Systems , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[10]  Seok-Hwan Cho,et al.  Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  Jin-Hun Jeon,et al.  Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  D. Edelhoff,et al.  Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[13]  Josef Schweiger,et al.  A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[14]  Derek K Smith,et al.  Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models. , 2015, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  Eneko Solaberrieta,et al.  Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  Seok-Hwan Cho,et al.  Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  R. Nedelcu,et al.  Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  Albert Mehl,et al.  Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. , 2013, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  Matthias Karl,et al.  A new triple-scan protocol for 3D fit assessment of dental restorations. , 2011, Quintessence international.

[20]  Techkouhie A Hamalian,et al.  Impression materials in fixed prosthodontics: influence of choice on clinical procedure. , 2011, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[21]  J. Hodges,et al.  Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[22]  Toyohiko Hayashi,et al.  Computer-aided determination of occlusal contact points for dental 3-D CAD , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  S. Davies,et al.  Reliability of recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks using transparent acetate sheet. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  James S Hodges,et al.  Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  A. Tripodakis,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal records in relation to two recording techniques. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[26]  W. Chee,et al.  Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[27]  W F Malone,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.