Pleiotropy as a mechanism to stabilize cooperation

Most genes affect many traits. This phenomenon, known as pleiotropy, is a major constraint on evolution because adaptive change in one trait may be prevented because it would compromise other traits affected by the same genes. Here we show that pleiotropy can have an unexpected effect and benefit one of the most enigmatic of adaptations—cooperation. A spectacular act of cooperation occurs in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum, in which some cells die to form a stalk that holds the other cells aloft as reproductive spores. We have identified a gene, dimA, in D. discoideum that has two contrasting effects. It is required to receive the signalling molecule DIF-1 that causes differentiation into prestalk cells. Ignoring DIF-1 and not becoming prestalk should allow cells to cheat by avoiding the stalk. However, we find that in aggregations containing the wild-type cells, lack of the dimA gene results in exclusion from spores. This pleiotropic linkage of stalk and spore formation limits the potential for cheating in D. discoideum because defecting on prestalk cell production results in an even greater reduction in spores. We propose that the evolution of pleiotropic links between cheating and personal costs can stabilize cooperative adaptations.

[1]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  J. Ashworth,et al.  Cell sorting out during the differentiation of mixtures of metabolically distinct populations of Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1973, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[3]  S. Wright Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volume 3: Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions , 1977 .

[4]  N. Barton,et al.  Pleiotropic models of quantitative variation. , 1990, Genetics.

[5]  J. Williams,et al.  An analysis of culmination in Dictyostelium using prestalk and stalk-specific cell autonomous markers. , 1991, Development.

[6]  L. Keller,et al.  The role of queen pheromones in social insects: queen control or queen signal? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Cell type regulation in response to expression of ricin A in Dictyostelium. , 1993, Developmental biology.

[8]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  CRAC, a cytosolic protein containing a pleckstrin homology domain, is required for receptor and G protein-mediated activation of adenylyl cyclase in Dictyostelium , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[10]  L. Hurst,et al.  Genetic Conflicts , 1996, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[11]  A. Zahavi,et al.  Altruistic behaviour in Dictyostelium discoideum explained on the basis of individual selection , 1997 .

[12]  E. Ponte,et al.  Detection of subtle phenotypes: the case of the cell adhesion molecule csA in Dictyostelium. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  L. Keller Levels of selection in evolution , 1999 .

[14]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[15]  R. Kay,et al.  Cell-fate choice in Dictyostelium: intrinsic biases modulate sensitivity to DIF signaling. , 2000, Developmental biology.

[16]  Edward G. Ruby,et al.  Vibrio fischeri lux Genes Play an Important Role in Colonization and Development of the Host Light Organ , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  R. Kay,et al.  The role of DIF-1 signaling in Dictyostelium development. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[18]  B. Charlesworth Levels of Selection in Evolution , 2000, Heredity.

[19]  R. Kay,et al.  Cross-induction of cell types in Dictyostelium: evidence that DIF-1 is made by prespore cells. , 2001, Development.

[20]  R. Kessin Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity , 2001 .

[21]  R. Kolter,et al.  Evolutionary cheating in Escherichia coli stationary phase cultures. , 2001, Genetics.

[22]  M. Riley,et al.  Bacteriocins: evolution, ecology, and application. , 2002, Annual review of microbiology.

[23]  D. Featherstone,et al.  Wrestling with pleiotropy: genomic and topological analysis of the yeast gene expression network. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[24]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Co‐occurrence in nature of different clones of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[25]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Single-Gene Greenbeard Effects in the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Science.

[26]  G. J. Velicer Social strife in the microbial world. , 2003, Trends in microbiology.

[27]  S. Frank PERSPECTIVE: REPRESSION OF COMPETITION AND THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION , 2003 .

[28]  S. Otto,et al.  Two steps forward, one step back: the pleiotropic effects of favoured alleles , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  M. Travisano,et al.  Strategies of microbial cheater control. , 2004, Trends in microbiology.

[30]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  A bZIP/bRLZ transcription factor required for DIF signaling in Dictyostelium , 2004, Development.