RESIDUAL CELLULAR PROLIFERATION ON THE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE IN MACULAR PUCKER SURGERY

Purpose: To provide pathology data on the completeness of epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Methods: Twenty-two patients with idiopathic ERM formation underwent vitrectomy with ERM removal and subsequent staining of the vitreomacular interface with brilliant blue. If the ILM was still present after ERM removal, it was peeled off. Both ERM and ILM specimens were harvested in different containers and prepared for flat-mount phase-contrast and interference microscopy, immunocytochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. Results: In 14 patients (64%), the ILM was still present at the macula after ERM removal. On average, 20% (range, 2–51%) of the total cell count was left behind at the ILM if the ERM was removed only. There were mainly glial cells on the ILM, and few hyalocytes. In nine eyes, the cells were forming cell clusters. In 8 patients (36%), both ERM and ILM were removed together. Electron microscopy showed cellular proliferation directly attached to the ILM in these eyes, whereas in the sequentially peeled group, there was collagen interposed between the ERM and the ILM. Surgical ERM removal resulted in splitting of the vitreous cortex in these eyes, leaving the ILM with residual cells behind. Conclusion: Simple ERM removal results in sufficient separation of fibrocellular tissue in one third of cases, only. In 2 of 3 patients with idiopathic ERM, the vitreous cortex splits when the ERM is removed, leaving an average of 20% of the total cell count behind on the ILM. As these cells are capable of proliferation and causing ERM recurrence, staining of the ILM with subsequent removal seems beneficial in macular pucker surgery.

[1]  L. Aiello,et al.  Possible contribution of hyalocytes to idiopathic epiretinal membrane formation and its contraction , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[2]  Anselm Kampik,et al.  Epiretinal and vitreous membranes: comparative study of 56 cases. 1981. , 1981, Retina.

[3]  U. Mester,et al.  Results of surgery for epiretinal membranes and their recurrences. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  J. Sebag Vitreous: the resplendent enigma , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  T. Sakamoto,et al.  Intraoperative characteristics of the posterior vitreous cortex in patients with epiretinal membrane , 2008, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[6]  J. Sebag Oval defect in detached posterior hyaloid membrane in idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  T. Hikichi,et al.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREMACULAR CORTICAL VITREOUS DEFECTS AND IDIOPATHIC PREMACULAR FIBROSIS , 1995, Retina.

[8]  K. Sonoda,et al.  Residual vitreous cortex after surgical posterior vitreous separation visualized by intravitreous triamcinolone acetonide. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[9]  Y. Hata,et al.  Residual internal limiting membrane in epiretinal membrane surgery , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Kampik,et al.  PATHOLOGY OF THE MACULAR HOLE RIM IN FLAT-MOUNTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE SPECIMENS , 2009, Retina.

[11]  R. Sorcinelli Surgical Management of Epiretinal Membrane with Indocyanine-Green-Assisted Peeling , 2003, Ophthalmologica.

[12]  T. Sakamoto,et al.  VITREOMACULAR ADHESION AND THE DEFECT IN POSTERIOR VITREOUS CORTEX VISUALIZED BY TRIAMCINOLONE-ASSISTED VITRECTOMY , 2005, Retina.

[13]  R. Foos Vitreoretinal juncture —Simple epiretinal membranes , 1974, Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie.

[14]  A. Kampik,et al.  Interference microscopy delineates cellular proliferations on flat mounted internal limiting membrane specimens , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[15]  R. Foos,et al.  Vitreoretinal juncture; epiretinal membranes and vitreous. , 1977, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  S. Kishi,et al.  Posterior precortical vitreous pocket. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  A. Kampik,et al.  Sequential epiretinal membrane removal with internal limiting membrane peeling in brilliant blue G-assisted macular surgery , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[18]  J. Sipperley,et al.  Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[19]  R. Machemer [The surgical removal of epiretinal macular membranes (macular puckers) (author's transl)]. , 1978, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[20]  J. Sebag Anomalous posterior vitreous detachment: a unifying concept in vitreo-retinal disease , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[21]  A. Kampik,et al.  Glial cell proliferation under the internal limiting membrane in a patient with cellophane maculopathy. , 2007, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

[22]  T. Lai,et al.  Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling , 2005, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.