Acquisition of a spatial conditioned place preference is impaired by amygdala lesions and improved by fornix lesions

This experiment examined the role of the lateral nucleus of the amygdala, the hippocampus and the dorsal striatum in the acquisition of a conditioned place preference (CPP). The CPP was established on a radial maze which was rotated before each daily trial so that only distal cues could be used to distinguish among locations on it. Each rat was assigned a paired location in which the arm contained food, and an unpaired location in which the arm was empty. A training trial consisted of 30-min confinements in the paired and unpaired locations on successive days. Groups of animals received between 1 and 4 training trials, after which they were tested for their preference between their two assigned locations with no food in either one. Normal animals acquired a CPP after 4 training trials, an instance of stimulus--reward learning. Electrolytic and neurotoxic lesions of the lateral nucleus of the amygdala prevented acquisition of the CPP in 4 training trials, suggesting that some function of this structure (or of a neural system that includes it) is required for acquisition and/or expression of stimulus--reward associations. Striatal lesions had no effect on the CPP. Fornix lesions facilitated acquisition of the CPP after 1-3 training trials, but no CPP was observed in animals with combined fornix and amygdala lesions, suggesting that exposure to the maze environment led to the processing of information in a hippocampal system that interfered with acquisition or expression of the amygdala-based CPP. Fornix lesions also increased the number of entries into maze arms on the test day, and concurrent amygdala lesions attenuated this increase. This finding suggests that the increase in arm entries may have been generated by the amygdala and suppressed by the hippocampus. Arm entries were interpreted as an instance of a particular type of exploratory behavior. Therefore, the present results suggest that a neural system including the lateral nucleus of the amygdala mediates both stimulus--reward learning and at least one form of exploration, possibly through its connections with the motor output system in ventral striatum. A hippocampal system appears to suppress or interfere with both of these behaviors in normal animals.

[1]  L. Weiskrantz,et al.  Behavioral changes associated with ablation of the amygdaloid complex in monkeys. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  H. D. Beach Morphine addiction in rats. , 1957, Canadian journal of psychology.

[3]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Cortical-hippocampal interactions and cognitive mapping: A hypothesis based on reintegration of the parietal and inferotemporal pathways for visual processing , 1989 .

[4]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[5]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Exploratory behavior as a function of hippocampal damage, stimulus complexity, and stimulus novelty in the hooded rat. , 1978, Behavioral biology.

[6]  C B Cave,et al.  Memory: organization of brain systems and cognition. , 1993, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[7]  N. Hiroi,et al.  The lateral nucleus of the amygdala mediates expression of the amphetamine-produced conditioned place preference , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  K. Pribram,et al.  A comparison of the effects of medial and lateral cerebral resections on conditioned avoidance behavior of monkeys. , 1957, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  J L McGaugh,et al.  Involvement of hormonal and neuromodulatory systems in the regulation of memory storage. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[10]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  From motivation to action: Functional interface between the limbic system and the motor system , 1980, Progress in Neurobiology.

[11]  G. Handelmann,et al.  Hippocampus, space, and memory , 1979 .

[12]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The hippocampus--what does it do? , 1992, Behavioral and neural biology.

[13]  D. Olton Mazes, maps, and memory. , 1979, The American psychologist.

[14]  Contributions of the amygdaloid central nucleus to the modulation of the nictitating membrane reflex in the rabbit. , 1991 .

[15]  N. White,et al.  Exploration evoked by electrical stimulation of the amygdala of rats , 1978 .

[16]  A. Phillips,et al.  Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward. , 1989 .

[17]  L. Weiskrantz Effects of Medial Temporal Lesions on Taste Preference in the Monkey , 1960, Nature.

[18]  C. Barnes Spatial learning and memory processes: the search for their neurobiological mechanisms in the rat , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  L. Heimer,et al.  New perspectives in basal forebrain organization of special relevance for neuropsychiatric disorders: The striatopallidal, amygdaloid, and corticopetal components of substantia innominata , 1988, Neuroscience.

[20]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Amygdala and dorsal hippocampus lesions block the effects of GABAergic drugs on memory storage , 1991, Brain Research.

[21]  N. White,et al.  Effects of amygdaloid lesions on exploration by rats , 1976, Physiology & Behavior.

[22]  C. A. Castro,et al.  Spatial selectivity of rat hippocampal neurons: dependence on preparedness for movement. , 1989, Science.

[23]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[24]  Schwartzbaum Js,et al.  Discrimination reversal and spatial alternation associated with septal and caudate dysfunction in rats. , 1968 .

[25]  S. Evans,et al.  Presence of a cholinergic projection from ventral striatum to amygdala that is not immunoreactive for NGF receptor , 1991, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  P. Cowan,et al.  Activity, Exploration, Curiosity and Fear: An Ethological Study , 1976 .

[27]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Recognition impaired and association intact in the memory of monkeys after transection of the fornix. , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[28]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[29]  M. Packard,et al.  Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  A. Parent,et al.  Basal forebrain cholinergic and noncholinergic projections to the thalamus and brainstem in cats and monkeys , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  T. Robbins,et al.  Involvement of the amygdala in stimulus-reward associations: Interaction with the ventral striatum , 1989, Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Huston,et al.  The relationship between reinforcement and memory: Parallels in the rewarding and mnemonic effects of the neuropeptide substance P , 1989, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[33]  G. Mogenson,et al.  Limbic-motor integration , 1987 .

[34]  N. Swerdlow,et al.  Paradoxical reinforcing properties of apomorphine: Effects of nucleus accumbens and area postrema lesions , 1983, Brain Research.

[35]  Schwartzbaum Js Interacting behavioral effects of septal and amygdaloid lesions in the rat. , 1966 .

[36]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Hippocampus, amygdala, and memory deficits in rats , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[37]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Alternation and exploration in rats with hippocampal lesions. , 1962, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[38]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia , 1989, Psychobiology.

[39]  M. Gallagher,et al.  The amygdala central nucleus and appetitive Pavlovian conditioning: lesions impair one class of conditioned behavior , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  D. Berlyne Curiosity and exploration. , 1966, Science.

[41]  John P. Aggleton,et al.  Amygdaloid lesions and stimulus-reward associations in the rat , 1991, Behavioural Brain Research.

[42]  M. Packard,et al.  Dissociation of hippocampus and caudate nucleus memory systems by posttraining intracerebral injection of dopamine agonists , 1991 .

[43]  H. Simon,et al.  Modulation of dopaminergic activity in the nucleus accumbens following facilitation or blockade of the dopaminergic transmission in the amygdala: a study by in vivo differential pulse voltammetry , 1985, Brain Research.

[44]  R. Hirsh The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: a theory. , 1974, Behavioral biology.

[45]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Visual-visual associative learning and reward-association learning in monkeys: the role of the amygdala , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[46]  A. Black,et al.  Hippocampal function in avoidance learning and punishment. , 1977, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Limbic lesions and the problem of stimulus--reinforcement associations. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[48]  R. Prado-Alcalá,et al.  Learning deficits produced by chronic and reversible lesions of the corpus striatum in rats , 1975, Physiology & Behavior.

[49]  T. Robbins,et al.  Complementary roles for the amygdala and hippocampus in aversive conditioning to explicit and contextual cues , 1991, Neuroscience.

[50]  M. A. Peinado-Manzano,et al.  The role of the amygdala and the hippocampus in working memory for spatial and non-spatial information , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[51]  A. McDonald,et al.  Topographical organization of amygdaloid projections to the caudatoputamen, nucleus accumbens, and related striatal-like areas of the rat brain , 1991, Neuroscience.

[52]  O. Phillipson,et al.  The topographic order of inputs to nucleus accumbens in the rat , 1985, Neuroscience.

[53]  T. Robbins,et al.  The basolateral amygdala-ventral striatal system and conditioned place preference: Further evidence of limbic-striatal interactions underlying reward-related processes , 1991, Neuroscience.

[54]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Representation in the hippocampus: what do hippocampal neurons code? , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[55]  A. Phillips,et al.  Cognition and the Basal Ganglia: A Possible Substrate for Procedural Knowledge , 1987, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[56]  T. Robbins,et al.  Interactions between the amygdala and ventral striatum in stimulus-reward associations: Studies using a second-order schedule of sexual reinforcement , 1989, Neuroscience.

[57]  I. Izquierdo,et al.  Memory facilitation by post-training intraperitoneal, intracerebroventricular and intra-amygdala injection of Ro 5-4864 , 1991, Brain Research.

[58]  L. W. Schmaltz,et al.  Effect of caudate and frontal lesions on acquisition and extinction of an operant response. , 1972, Physiology & behavior.

[59]  F. Gage,et al.  Hippocampal connections and spatial discrimination , 1978, Brain Research.

[60]  P. Reynolds Exploratory Behavior: A Theoretical Interpretation: , 1962 .

[61]  Bryan Kolb,et al.  Spatial mapping: definitive disruption by hippocampal or medial frontal cortical damage in the rat , 1982, Neuroscience Letters.

[62]  Angeles Peinado-Manzano,et al.  Intervention of the lateral and central amygdala on the association of visual stimuli with different magnitudes of reinforcement , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[63]  J. Huston,et al.  Conditioned place preference in the corral: a procedure for measuring reinforcing properties of drugs , 1989, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[64]  R. Roth,et al.  Individual differences in behavioral measures: Correlations with nucleus accumbens dopamine measured by microdialysis , 1991, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[65]  G. P. Smith,et al.  Mesolimbic and mesocortical dopaminergic neurons are necessary for normal exploratory behavior in rats , 1980, Neuroscience Letters.

[66]  I. Divac Functions of the caudate nucleus. , 1968, Acta biologiae experimentalis.

[67]  N. White A functional hypothesis concerning the striatal matrix and patches: mediation of S-R memory and reward. , 1989, Life sciences.

[68]  N. Hiroi,et al.  The reserpine-sensitive dopamine pool mediates (+)-amphetamine-conditioned reward in the place preference paradigm , 1990, Brain Research.