Multiliteracies Meet Methods: The Case for Digital Writing in English Education.

focus here will be on how Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) matter to English language arts and literacy education. * We are very much interested in how English educators might better prepare teachers to use ICTs effectively in writing instruction, but we think it is necessary to reimagine the "technology-writing" relationship as a new type of situated literacy practice in order to do so. We are moving in the right direction. Conversations in English and teacher education that originally centered on how to use technology quickly moved to questions about why; moreover, critical and more generative questions about how and why we should use technology are becoming the norm (e.g., Alvine, 2000; Bowman, 2000; Bush, 2003; Carroll & Bowman, 2000; Pope & Golub, 2000; Pope & Christopher, 2004; McGrail, 2005). Given NCTE's current focus on multiple literacies, we hope that our discussion of technology helps us think about the future of "multiliteracies" and their place in English education. Our contribution will be an attempt to link, at a deeper level, multiliteracies and the technologies that make them possible. We will do so in a way that might help us rethink Fecho's (2003) questionAre new media and other technology-driven literacies being adequately addressed through methods courses?and offer a rationale for the inclusion of ICTs at the core of English Education. 2

[1]  Dànielle Nicole DeVoss,et al.  "It wasn't me, was it?" Plagiarism and the Web , 2002 .

[2]  P. Twining Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom , 2002 .

[3]  Carol Pope,et al.  Preparing Tomorrow's English Language Arts Teachers Today: Principles and Practices for Infusing Technology , 2000 .

[4]  Pamela S. Carroll,et al.  Leaping Fire: Texts and Technology , 2000 .

[5]  Jonathan Bush Beyond Technical Competence: Technologies in English Language Arts Teacher Education (A Response to Pope and Golub) , 2002 .

[6]  Thomas E. Krucli Making Assessment Matter: Using the Computer to Create Interactive Feedback. , 2004 .

[7]  Robert F. Vernon,et al.  Plagiarism and the Web , 2001 .

[8]  Carol Pope,et al.  An Update on Developing Techno-Savvy English Language Arts Teachers , 2004 .

[9]  S. Michaels,et al.  A pedagogy of Multiliteracies Designing Social Futures , 1996 .

[10]  Roz Ivanic,et al.  Situated literacies : reading and writing in context , 2000 .

[11]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Tinkering toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform. , 1996 .

[12]  Stuart A. Selber,et al.  Multiliteracies for a Digital Age , 2004 .

[13]  Cynthia Ann Bowman Infusing Technology-Based Instructional Frameworks in the Methods Courses: A Response to Pope and Golub , 2000 .

[14]  C. B. Elliott Helping Students Weave Their Way through the World Wide Web. , 2000 .

[15]  Rebecca Bowers Sipe Virtually Being There: Creating Authentic Experiences through Interactive Exchanges. , 2000 .

[16]  K. Frank,et al.  Factors Affecting Technology Uses in Schools: An Ecological Perspective , 2003 .

[17]  R. Rozema Falling into Story: Teaching Reading with the Literary MOO. , 2003 .

[18]  Ewa McGrail Teachers, Technology, and Change: English Teachers’ Perspectives , 2005 .