The effect of nanoparticles on plankton dynamics: A mathematical model

A simple modification of the Rosenzweig-MacArthur predator (zooplankton)-prey (phytoplankton) model with the interference of the predators by adding the effect of nanoparticles is proposed and analyzed. It is assumed that the effect of these particles has a potential to reduce the maximum physiological per-capita growth rate of the prey. The dynamics of nanoparticles is assumed to follow a simple Lotka-Volterra uptake term. Our study suggests that nanoparticle induce growth suppression of phytoplankton population can destabilize the system which leads to limit cycle oscillation. We also observe that if the contact rate of nanoparticles and phytoplankton increases, then the equilibrium densities of phytoplankton as well as zooplankton decrease. Furthermore, we observe that the depletion/removal of nanoparticles from the aquatic system plays a crucial role for the stable coexistence of both populations. Our investigation with various types of functional response suggests that Beddington functional response is the most appropriate representation of the interaction of phytoplankton-nanoparticles in comparison to other widely used functional responses.

[1]  Thomas G. Hallam,et al.  Effects of toxicants on populations: A qualitative: Approach III. Environmental and food chain pathways* , 1984 .

[2]  Jérôme Labille,et al.  Stability of nanoparticles in water. , 2010, Nanomedicine.

[3]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[4]  M. Xenopoulos,et al.  Interactive effects of silver nanoparticles and phosphorus on phytoplankton growth in natural waters. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Jamie R Lead,et al.  Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[6]  Jing Li,et al.  Toxicity and internalization of CuO nanoparticles to prokaryotic alga Microcystis aeruginosa as affected by dissolved organic matter. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Anne Kahru,et al.  Potential hazard of nanoparticles: from properties to biological and environmental effects. , 2010, Toxicology.

[8]  Arturo A. Keller,et al.  TiO2 Nanoparticles Are Phototoxic to Marine Phytoplankton , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  T. Bellows,et al.  Simulation models for laboratory populations of Callosobruchus chinensis and Callosobruchus maculatus Stored products of plant origin, beetles , 1982 .

[10]  Thomas G. Hallam,et al.  Effects of toxicants on populations: a qualitative approach I. Equilibrium environmental exposure , 1983 .

[11]  Henry J. Kania,et al.  Behavioral Alterations in a Simple Predator-Prey System Due to Sublethal Exposure to Mercury , 1974 .

[12]  T. Xia,et al.  Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel , 2006, Science.

[13]  Fumio Nakajima.  The paradox of enrichment , 2008 .

[14]  Richard D. Handy,et al.  The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[15]  M E Gilpin,et al.  Enriched predator-prey systems: theoretical stability. , 1972, Science.

[16]  T. Hallam,et al.  Effects of toxicants on populations: A qualitative approach II. first order kinetics , 1983, Journal of mathematical biology.

[17]  J. Beddington,et al.  Mutual Interference Between Parasites or Predators and its Effect on Searching Efficiency , 1975 .

[18]  Wei-Chun Chin,et al.  Zinc oxide–engineered nanoparticles: Dissolution and toxicity to marine phytoplankton , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[19]  M. Rosenzweig.  Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.

[20]  Enrique Navarro,et al.  Toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Hemant J. Purohit,et al.  Bacterial consortia for crude oil spill remediation , 1996 .

[22]  G. Di Francia,et al.  Characterization of nanoparticles in seawater for toxicity assessment towards aquatic organisms , 2011 .

[23]  Suchi Smita,et al.  Nanoparticles in the environment: assessment using the causal diagram approach , 2012, Environmental Health.

[24]  Cástor Guisande,et al.  Comparative Responses to Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Marine Phytoplankton , 2014, Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.

[25]  Damià Barceló,et al.  Ecotoxicity and analysis of nanomaterials in the aquatic environment , 2009, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[26]  Arturo A. Keller,et al.  Environmental Feedbacks and Engineered Nanoparticles: Mitigation of Silver Nanoparticle Toxicity to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by Algal-Produced Organic Compounds , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  Y. Kuang,et al.  Modeling and analysis of a marine bacteriophage infection. , 1998, Mathematical biosciences.

[28]  Joydev Chattopadhyay,et al.  Viral infection on phytoplankton–zooplankton system—a mathematical model , 2002 .

[29]  Malay Banerjee,et al.  Modelling of phytoplankton allelopathy with Monod-Haldane-type functional response - A mathematical study , 2009, Biosyst..

[30]  Nanna B. Hartmann,et al.  Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[31]  Damià Barceló,et al.  Analysis, behavior and ecotoxicity of carbon-based nanomaterials in the aquatic environment , 2009 .

[32]  Zhiping Luo,et al.  The algal toxicity of silver engineered nanoparticles and detoxification by exopolymeric substances. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[33]  Zoltán Kónya,et al.  Nervous system effects in rats on subacute exposure by lead-containing nanoparticles via the airways , 2011, Inhalation toxicology.

[34]  Jing Luo,et al.  Effects of particle composition and species on toxicity of metallic nanomaterials in aquatic organisms , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[35]  S Mandal,et al.  Toxin-producing plankton may act as a biological control for planktonic blooms--field study and mathematical modelling. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.