Robust Design of Transonic Natural Laminar Flow Wings under Environmental and Operational Uncertainties

The introduction of laminar flow configurations is envisioned to provide new opportunities to further reduce aircraft fuel consumption. The robustness of laminar wings is critical, both against instabilities that can unexpectedly trigger transition and against off-design conditions outside the cruise point. However, current inverse design methodologies not only provide suboptimal configurations, but are unable to come up with robust configurations. The objective of this paper is the development and demonstration of a framework for the robust direct design of transonic natural laminar flow wings using state-of-the-art industrial tools such as computational fluid dynamics, linear stability theory and surrogate models. The deterministic optimization problem, which serves as a baseline, searches for the optimum shape that minimizes drag applying a surrogate based optimization strategy. In that case Cross-Flow and Tollmien-Schlichting critical N-Factors are fixed according to calibration data. For the robust approach, uncertainties in these critical N-Factors as well as operational conditions such as Mach number are considered to account for situations that could prematurely trigger transition and thus significantly decrease performance. The surrogate based optimizer is therefore coupled with a surrogate based uncertainty quantification methodology, following a bi-level approach. The objective function shifts towards the expectation of the drag to minimize average fuel consumption, or the 95% quantile to account for extreme events. The framework is able to come up with state-of-the-art natural laminar configurations for a short-haul civil aircraft configuration. The deterministic optimum is able to delay transition till 60% of the wing upper surface where the shock is present but is highly sensitive to small changes in the predefined critical N-Factors, as minor deviations will lead to fully turbulent configuration and hence an increase in drag. The robust configurations are more balanced, as the transition location smoothly moves upstream as the critical N-Factors are reduced. As a direct consequence, obtained pressure profiles are more resistant against instabilities, extending the current design envelope of natural laminar flow wings.

[1]  Jens Neumann,et al.  The Parallel Mesh Deformation of the DLR TAU-Code , 2007 .

[2]  Stefan Goertz,et al.  An Efficient Bi-Level Surrogate Approach for Optimizing Shock Control Bumps under Uncertainty , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[3]  Siegfried Wagner,et al.  Recent Results in Laminar-Turbulent Transition , 2004 .

[4]  Richard L. Campbell,et al.  Natural Laminar Flow Design for Wings with Moderate Sweep , 2016 .

[5]  I. Sobol On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals , 1967 .

[6]  J. V. Ingen A suggested semi-empirical method for the calculation of the boundary layer transition region , 1956 .

[7]  Emiliano Iuliano,et al.  Robust Design of a Supersonic Natural Laminar Flow Wing-Body , 2017, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[8]  Thomas Streit,et al.  DLR natural and hybrid transonic laminar wing design incorporating new methodologies , 2015, The Aeronautical Journal.

[9]  Philip L. Roe,et al.  Understanding Aerodynamics: Arguing from the Real Physics , 2014 .

[10]  K. H. Horstmann,et al.  Design for a natural laminar flow glove for a transport aircraft , 1990 .

[11]  Zhonghua Han,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Natural-Laminar-Flow Wing Using Surrogate-Based Approach , 2018, AIAA Journal.

[12]  Johnathan Green Laminar Flow Control - Back to the Future? , 2008 .

[13]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[14]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Improving variable-fidelity surrogate modeling via gradient-enhanced kriging and a generalized hybrid bridge function , 2013 .

[15]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Efficient Quantification of Aerodynamic Uncertainty due to Random Geometry Perturbations , 2014 .

[16]  Zhonghua Han,et al.  Efficient Uncertainty Quantification using Gradient-Enhanced Kriging , 2009 .

[17]  Melissa B. Rivers,et al.  Assessment of the National Transonic Facility for Natural Laminar Flow Testing , 2010 .

[18]  Doug McLean,et al.  Understanding Aerodynamics: Arguing from the Real Physics , 2012 .

[19]  Sally A. Viken,et al.  Preliminary Results from an Experimental Assessment of a Natural Laminar Flow Design Method , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[20]  Nils Beck,et al.  Drag reduction by laminar flow control , 2018 .

[21]  H. Schrauf EVALUATION OF THE A320 HYBRID LAMINAR FIN EXPERIMENT , 2000 .

[22]  Jens K. Fassbender,et al.  MEGAFLOW - Numerical Flow Simulation for Aircraft Design , 2005 .

[23]  Michael Meinel,et al.  The FlowSimulator framework for massively parallel CFD applications , 2010 .

[24]  Thomas Gerhold,et al.  Overview of the Hybrid RANS Code TAU , 2005 .

[25]  Ning Qin,et al.  Robustness of Natural Laminar Flow Airfoil Drag Optimization to Transition Amplification Factor , 2017 .

[26]  G. Schrauf Industrial View on Transition Prediction , 2004 .

[27]  G. Schrauf,et al.  Status and perspectives of laminar flow , 2005, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[28]  Z. Gao,et al.  Robust Design of High Speed Natural-Laminar-Flow Airfoil for High Lift , 2017 .

[29]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[30]  Gerhart I. Schuëller,et al.  Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties – An overview , 2008 .

[31]  Geza Schrauf,et al.  LARGE-SCALE LAMINAR FLOW TESTS EVALUATED WITH LINEAR STABILITY THEORY , 2001 .

[32]  J. E. Green,et al.  Civil aviation and the environment – the next frontier for the aerodynamicist , 2006, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[33]  Régis Duvigneau Aerodynamic Shape Optimization with Uncertain Operating Conditions using Metamodels , 2007 .

[34]  B. Kulfan Universal Parametric Geometry Representation Method , 2008 .

[35]  Hossein Zare-Behtash,et al.  State-of-the-art in aerodynamic shape optimisation methods , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[36]  Ling Li,et al.  Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure , 2010, Statistics and Computing.