STEPS IN THE PRODUCTION OF MOTONEURON SPIKES

1. Spikes evoked in spinal motoneurons by antidromic stimulation normally present an inflection in their rising phase. A similar inflection is present in spikes evoked by direct stimulation with short pulses. 2. In either case the inflection becomes less prominent if the motoneuron membrane is depolarized and more prominent when it is hyperpolarized. Both antidromic and direct spikes may fall from the level of the inflection thus evoking a "small spike" only if sufficient hyperpolarization is applied. Similar events occur when antidromic or direct spikes are evoked in the aftermath of a preceding spike. 3. Spikes evoked by direct stimuli applied shortly after firing of a "small spike" may also become partially blocked at a critical stimulus interval. At shorter intervals, however, spike size again increases and no inflection can be detected in the rising phase. 4. When a weak direct stimulus evokes a small spike only, a stronger stimulus may evoke a full spike. Curves of the strength of the stimuli required for eliciting small or full spikes have been constructed in a number of conditions. 5. To explain the results it is assumed that threshold of the major portions of the soma membrane is higher than the threshold of the axon, the transition occurring over a finite area near the axon hillock. Following antidromic or direct stimulation, soma excitation is then initiated in the region of the axon hillock. Spread of activity towards the soma occurs at first slowly and with low safety factor. At this stage block may be easily evoked. Safety factor for propagation increases rapidly as the growing impulse involves larger and larger areas of the soma membrane so that, once the critical areas are excited, activation of the remaining portions of the soma membrane will suddenly occur.

[1]  M. Fuortes,et al.  Potentials recorded from the spinal cord with microelectrodes , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  J. Eccles,et al.  Intracellular recording from antidromically activated motoneurones , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  T. Araki,et al.  Response of single motoneurons to direct stimulation in toad's spinal cord. , 1955, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  P. Fatt Electric potentials occurring around a neurone during its antidromic activation. , 1957, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  S. Crain Resting and action potentials of cultured chick embryo spinal ganglion cells , 1956, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  A. Hodgkin Evidence for electrical transmission in nerve , 1937 .

[7]  P. Fatt,et al.  PHYSIOLOGY OF NERVE CELLS , 1957 .

[8]  B. Renshaw Central effects of centripetal impulses in axons of spinal ventral roots. , 1946, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Eccles,et al.  The nature of the monosynaptic excitatory and inhibitory processes in the spinal cord , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[10]  K. Koketsu,et al.  Cholinergic and inhibitory synapses in a pathway from motor‐axon collaterals to motoneurones , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  M. Fuortes,et al.  Stimulation of spinal motoneurones with intracellular electrodes , 1956, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  J. Eccles,et al.  The electrical properties of the motoneurone membrane , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  J. Eccles,et al.  The recording of potentials from motoneurones with an intracellular electrode , 1952, The Journal of physiology.